{"title":"去专业化、身份认同和生产力争论:一个研究难题?","authors":"N. Malin","doi":"10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent letter to the Financial Times a group of left-leaning economists said that the Labour Party’s radical manifesto is justified by ‘Britain’s array of structural problems, including a lost decade for productivity growth, a dearth of investment and the gulf between London and the south-east and the rest of the country’ (Blanchflower and others, 2019). Given that the newly elected Conservative Government espouses the language of easing austerity, a key research question for social policy might be","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"20 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-professionalism, identity and the productivity debate: A research puzzle?\",\"authors\":\"N. Malin\",\"doi\":\"10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a recent letter to the Financial Times a group of left-leaning economists said that the Labour Party’s radical manifesto is justified by ‘Britain’s array of structural problems, including a lost decade for productivity growth, a dearth of investment and the gulf between London and the south-east and the rest of the country’ (Blanchflower and others, 2019). Given that the newly elected Conservative Government espouses the language of easing austerity, a key research question for social policy might be\",\"PeriodicalId\":53681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"3-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work and Social Sciences Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/SWSSR.V20I3.1344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
De-professionalism, identity and the productivity debate: A research puzzle?
In a recent letter to the Financial Times a group of left-leaning economists said that the Labour Party’s radical manifesto is justified by ‘Britain’s array of structural problems, including a lost decade for productivity growth, a dearth of investment and the gulf between London and the south-east and the rest of the country’ (Blanchflower and others, 2019). Given that the newly elected Conservative Government espouses the language of easing austerity, a key research question for social policy might be