巴西教师参与统计教育研究综述:方法论路径与培训背景

Q3 Social Sciences
Douglas da Silva Tinti, Celi Espasandin Lopes
{"title":"巴西教师参与统计教育研究综述:方法论路径与培训背景","authors":"Douglas da Silva Tinti, Celi Espasandin Lopes","doi":"10.52041/serj.v20i2.414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to analyze Brazilian research on statistics education involving teachers to highlight methodological trends and training contexts mobilized by such research. To this end, a survey was carried out in the Dissertation and Thesis Bank of CAPES, considering the descriptor \"Statistical Education” and the 2013-2018 timeframe. A total of ninety-nine studies were found, twenty of which met the proposed objective. This is a documentary and bibliographic study, in which an interpretative approach was adopted using the technique of content analysis. The data analysis verified that nine of those studies did not lead to training processes with teachers. In addition, the analysis of the other eleven studies, which led to training, revealed an intrinsic relationship between the methodological path and the training contexts reported. This demonstrated the expressiveness of training contexts based on epistemology of collaboration, that is, those contexts that both give voice and listen to teachers, and recognize them as producers of knowledge. Conversely, we identified two research studies that shaped the training considering the paradigm of technical rationality, and designed training courses to address certain content/concepts that teachers supposedly do not master. It was evidenced that the conception of teacher training has a direct and explicit relationship with the organization of the training spaces outlined. Finally, we identified one research study based on epistemology of practice, which focuses on the understanding of knowledge mobilized in teaching practice.\nAbstract: Portuguese\nO presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar pesquisas brasileiras de Educação Estatística que envolveram professores, com vistas a evidenciar tendências metodológicas e de contextos formativos mobilizados por tais estudos. Para tanto, realizou-se um mapeamento no Banco de Dissertações e Teses da CAPES, considerando o descritor “Educação Estatística” e o período de 2013 a 2018. Foram identificadas 99 pesquisas, dentre as quais 20 dialogam com o objetivo proposto. Trata-se de um estudo documental e bibliográfico, no qual se adotou uma abordagem interpretativa que tem como técnica a análise de conteúdo. A análise dos dados permitiu identificar que nove destes estudos não desencadearam processos formativos com os docentes. Além disso, a análise das demais 11 pesquisas, que desenvolveram processos formativos, revelou uma intrínseca relação entre o percurso metodológico e os contextos formativos relatados. Nesse sentido, evidenciou-se uma expressividade de contextos formativos pautados na epistemologia da colaboração, ou seja, aqueles que dão voz aos professores e se colocam à sua escuta; que os reconhecem como produtores de conhecimento. Em contrapartida, duas pesquisas estruturaram as formações, considerando o paradigma da racionalidade técnica e concebendo cursos de capacitação para abordar determinado conteúdo/conceito que o professor supostamente não domina. Constatou-se que a concepção de formação de professores tem relação direta e explícita com a organização dos espaços de formação delineados. Por fim, identificou-se uma pesquisa alicerçada na epistemologia da prática, que se volta para a compreensão de saberes mobilizados no fazer docente.","PeriodicalId":38581,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Education Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OVERVIEW OF BRAZILIAN RESEARCH ON STATISTICS EDUCATION INVOLVING TEACHERS: METHODOLOGICAL PATHS AND TRAINING CONTEXTS\",\"authors\":\"Douglas da Silva Tinti, Celi Espasandin Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/serj.v20i2.414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to analyze Brazilian research on statistics education involving teachers to highlight methodological trends and training contexts mobilized by such research. To this end, a survey was carried out in the Dissertation and Thesis Bank of CAPES, considering the descriptor \\\"Statistical Education” and the 2013-2018 timeframe. A total of ninety-nine studies were found, twenty of which met the proposed objective. This is a documentary and bibliographic study, in which an interpretative approach was adopted using the technique of content analysis. The data analysis verified that nine of those studies did not lead to training processes with teachers. In addition, the analysis of the other eleven studies, which led to training, revealed an intrinsic relationship between the methodological path and the training contexts reported. This demonstrated the expressiveness of training contexts based on epistemology of collaboration, that is, those contexts that both give voice and listen to teachers, and recognize them as producers of knowledge. Conversely, we identified two research studies that shaped the training considering the paradigm of technical rationality, and designed training courses to address certain content/concepts that teachers supposedly do not master. It was evidenced that the conception of teacher training has a direct and explicit relationship with the organization of the training spaces outlined. Finally, we identified one research study based on epistemology of practice, which focuses on the understanding of knowledge mobilized in teaching practice.\\nAbstract: Portuguese\\nO presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar pesquisas brasileiras de Educação Estatística que envolveram professores, com vistas a evidenciar tendências metodológicas e de contextos formativos mobilizados por tais estudos. Para tanto, realizou-se um mapeamento no Banco de Dissertações e Teses da CAPES, considerando o descritor “Educação Estatística” e o período de 2013 a 2018. Foram identificadas 99 pesquisas, dentre as quais 20 dialogam com o objetivo proposto. Trata-se de um estudo documental e bibliográfico, no qual se adotou uma abordagem interpretativa que tem como técnica a análise de conteúdo. A análise dos dados permitiu identificar que nove destes estudos não desencadearam processos formativos com os docentes. Além disso, a análise das demais 11 pesquisas, que desenvolveram processos formativos, revelou uma intrínseca relação entre o percurso metodológico e os contextos formativos relatados. Nesse sentido, evidenciou-se uma expressividade de contextos formativos pautados na epistemologia da colaboração, ou seja, aqueles que dão voz aos professores e se colocam à sua escuta; que os reconhecem como produtores de conhecimento. Em contrapartida, duas pesquisas estruturaram as formações, considerando o paradigma da racionalidade técnica e concebendo cursos de capacitação para abordar determinado conteúdo/conceito que o professor supostamente não domina. Constatou-se que a concepção de formação de professores tem relação direta e explícita com a organização dos espaços de formação delineados. Por fim, identificou-se uma pesquisa alicerçada na epistemologia da prática, que se volta para a compreensão de saberes mobilizados no fazer docente.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics Education Research Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics Education Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v20i2.414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v20i2.414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析巴西对教师参与的统计教育的研究,以突出这类研究的方法论趋势和培训背景。为此在CAPES的论文库进行了调查,考虑描述符“统计教育”和2013-2018年的时间框架。共发现99项研究,其中20项符合拟议目标。这是一项文献和书目研究,其中采用了内容分析技术的解释方法。数据分析证实,其中9项研究没有导致教师的培训过程。对其他11项导致训练的研究的分析揭示了方法论路径和所报道的训练环境之间的内在关系。这证明了基于协作认识论的训练情境的表现力,即那些既能发出声音又能倾听老师的情境,并将他们视为知识的生产者。相反,我们确定了两项研究,它们考虑到技术理性的范式来塑造培训,并设计培训课程来解决教师可能不掌握的某些内容/概念。事实证明,教师培训的概念与所概述的培训空间的组织有着直接而明确的关系。最后,我们确定了一项基于实践认识论的研究,该研究侧重于对教学实践中调动的知识的理解。本文旨在分析巴西涉及教师的统计教育研究,以突出这些研究所调动的方法论趋势和教育背景。为此,考虑到“统计教育”的描述和2013年至2018年期间,在CAPES的论文和论文库中进行了映射。确定了99项研究,其中20项与拟议目标进行了对话。这是一项文献和书目研究,采用了一种解释方法,作为技术内容分析。数据分析使我们能够确定,其中9项研究没有触发教师的培训过程。此外,对开发培训过程的其他11项研究的分析揭示了方法论路径与所报告的培训背景之间的内在关系。从这个意义上说,它证明了基于合作认识论的形成性语境的表现力,即那些为教师发声并让自己倾听他们的人;他们承认他们是知识的生产者。相比之下,两项研究构建了这些形式,考虑了技术理性的范式,并设计了培训课程来解决教师可能不掌握的某些内容/概念。研究发现,教师培训的概念与所概述的培训空间的组织有着直接而明确的关系。最后,我们确定了一个基于实践认识论的研究,它转向对教学中调动的知识的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OVERVIEW OF BRAZILIAN RESEARCH ON STATISTICS EDUCATION INVOLVING TEACHERS: METHODOLOGICAL PATHS AND TRAINING CONTEXTS
This article aims to analyze Brazilian research on statistics education involving teachers to highlight methodological trends and training contexts mobilized by such research. To this end, a survey was carried out in the Dissertation and Thesis Bank of CAPES, considering the descriptor "Statistical Education” and the 2013-2018 timeframe. A total of ninety-nine studies were found, twenty of which met the proposed objective. This is a documentary and bibliographic study, in which an interpretative approach was adopted using the technique of content analysis. The data analysis verified that nine of those studies did not lead to training processes with teachers. In addition, the analysis of the other eleven studies, which led to training, revealed an intrinsic relationship between the methodological path and the training contexts reported. This demonstrated the expressiveness of training contexts based on epistemology of collaboration, that is, those contexts that both give voice and listen to teachers, and recognize them as producers of knowledge. Conversely, we identified two research studies that shaped the training considering the paradigm of technical rationality, and designed training courses to address certain content/concepts that teachers supposedly do not master. It was evidenced that the conception of teacher training has a direct and explicit relationship with the organization of the training spaces outlined. Finally, we identified one research study based on epistemology of practice, which focuses on the understanding of knowledge mobilized in teaching practice. Abstract: Portuguese O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar pesquisas brasileiras de Educação Estatística que envolveram professores, com vistas a evidenciar tendências metodológicas e de contextos formativos mobilizados por tais estudos. Para tanto, realizou-se um mapeamento no Banco de Dissertações e Teses da CAPES, considerando o descritor “Educação Estatística” e o período de 2013 a 2018. Foram identificadas 99 pesquisas, dentre as quais 20 dialogam com o objetivo proposto. Trata-se de um estudo documental e bibliográfico, no qual se adotou uma abordagem interpretativa que tem como técnica a análise de conteúdo. A análise dos dados permitiu identificar que nove destes estudos não desencadearam processos formativos com os docentes. Além disso, a análise das demais 11 pesquisas, que desenvolveram processos formativos, revelou uma intrínseca relação entre o percurso metodológico e os contextos formativos relatados. Nesse sentido, evidenciou-se uma expressividade de contextos formativos pautados na epistemologia da colaboração, ou seja, aqueles que dão voz aos professores e se colocam à sua escuta; que os reconhecem como produtores de conhecimento. Em contrapartida, duas pesquisas estruturaram as formações, considerando o paradigma da racionalidade técnica e concebendo cursos de capacitação para abordar determinado conteúdo/conceito que o professor supostamente não domina. Constatou-se que a concepção de formação de professores tem relação direta e explícita com a organização dos espaços de formação delineados. Por fim, identificou-se uma pesquisa alicerçada na epistemologia da prática, que se volta para a compreensão de saberes mobilizados no fazer docente.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics Education Research Journal
Statistics Education Research Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: SERJ is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI). SERJ is published twice a year and is free. SERJ aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed. The Journal encourages the submission of quality papers related to the above goals, such as reports of original research (both quantitative and qualitative), integrative and critical reviews of research literature, analyses of research-based theoretical and methodological models, and other types of papers described in full in the Guidelines for Authors. All papers are reviewed internally by an Associate Editor or Editor, and are blind-reviewed by at least two external referees. Contributions in English are recommended. Contributions in French and Spanish will also be considered. A submitted paper must not have been published before or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信