书评:走在古老的道路上:对耶利米的评论,由小沃尔特C.凯撒与提比略拉塔

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Jaime L. Waters
{"title":"书评:走在古老的道路上:对耶利米的评论,由小沃尔特C.凯撒与提比略拉塔","authors":"Jaime L. Waters","doi":"10.1177/01461079211035013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tions, such as idolatry, falsely swearing by the name of God, violating a covenant made at the Temple, or a priest eating sacred food while profane. Imes likewise examines nś to bear; šwʾ, which with the lamed prefix is probably best rendered in vain, and nqh. She argues that nqh should be viewed in the context of the evident intertextuality between the Name Command and Yahweh’s self-revelation in Exodus 34:6–7, hence render innocent. Having considered the canonical and early historical context of these words, Imes then (chapter four) proceeds to examine them as part of the Decalogue in narrative context. The decalogue stands at the peak, quite literally, of a great chiasm where the wilderness wanderings prior to Sinai are mirrored in the wilderness wanderings that follow it. It is attested with a great theophany, and is set in covenantal terms as the loyal response expected of Israel to her divine suzerain. She notes that the two stone tablets were located at the very heart of the nation, in the Holy of Holies. All of these position the decalogue, and the Name Command within it, as a reinforcement of the covenant formula, “I will be your God and you will be my people.” In her final chapter, Imes employs metaphor theory to establish the conceptual domains within which the Name Command should be understood. With reference to the work of the previous chapters, she concludes that the metaphor of “Name” stands for Yahweh’s claim to ownership, and the metaphor of “Bearing” falls within the conceptual domain of “Obedience is a journey.” The ownership idea relates to the branding motif discussed above, and to divine election. To bear the name of the Lord, then, has deep implications for his reputation. She closes the book with a discussion of the High Priest’s ordination protocols and vestments, in view of his status as representative of Israel, bearing both Israel’s name and Yahweh’s into the sanctuary. This is a model of meticulous scholarship that results in meaningful exegetical benefit. It is a significant addition to Pentateuch scholarship and will be of benefit more widely, particularly to pastors and other Christians who wish to take the Old Testament seriously. Helen Paynter Centre for the Study of Bible & Violence Bristol, UK BS 9 1 DF","PeriodicalId":41921,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","volume":"52 1","pages":"123 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews: Walking the Ancient Paths: A Commentary on Jeremiah, by Walter C. Kaiser Jr. with Tiberius Rata\",\"authors\":\"Jaime L. Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461079211035013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tions, such as idolatry, falsely swearing by the name of God, violating a covenant made at the Temple, or a priest eating sacred food while profane. Imes likewise examines nś to bear; šwʾ, which with the lamed prefix is probably best rendered in vain, and nqh. She argues that nqh should be viewed in the context of the evident intertextuality between the Name Command and Yahweh’s self-revelation in Exodus 34:6–7, hence render innocent. Having considered the canonical and early historical context of these words, Imes then (chapter four) proceeds to examine them as part of the Decalogue in narrative context. The decalogue stands at the peak, quite literally, of a great chiasm where the wilderness wanderings prior to Sinai are mirrored in the wilderness wanderings that follow it. It is attested with a great theophany, and is set in covenantal terms as the loyal response expected of Israel to her divine suzerain. She notes that the two stone tablets were located at the very heart of the nation, in the Holy of Holies. All of these position the decalogue, and the Name Command within it, as a reinforcement of the covenant formula, “I will be your God and you will be my people.” In her final chapter, Imes employs metaphor theory to establish the conceptual domains within which the Name Command should be understood. With reference to the work of the previous chapters, she concludes that the metaphor of “Name” stands for Yahweh’s claim to ownership, and the metaphor of “Bearing” falls within the conceptual domain of “Obedience is a journey.” The ownership idea relates to the branding motif discussed above, and to divine election. To bear the name of the Lord, then, has deep implications for his reputation. She closes the book with a discussion of the High Priest’s ordination protocols and vestments, in view of his status as representative of Israel, bearing both Israel’s name and Yahweh’s into the sanctuary. This is a model of meticulous scholarship that results in meaningful exegetical benefit. It is a significant addition to Pentateuch scholarship and will be of benefit more widely, particularly to pastors and other Christians who wish to take the Old Testament seriously. Helen Paynter Centre for the Study of Bible & Violence Bristol, UK BS 9 1 DF\",\"PeriodicalId\":41921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079211035013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079211035013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

例如偶像崇拜,以上帝的名义发誓,违反在圣殿所立的约,或者祭司在亵渎的同时吃了神圣的食物。《时代》同样考察了nzto bear;šw带lamed前缀的“-”可能最好被译为“vain”,还有nqh。她认为nqh应该放在名字命令和耶和华在出埃及记34:6-7中自我启示之间明显的互文性的背景下看待,因此被认为是无辜的。在考虑了这些话的正典和早期历史背景之后,艾姆斯(第四章)继续在叙事背景下将它们作为十诫的一部分进行研究。十诫站在顶峰,毫不夸张地说,是一个巨大的交叉点,在西奈半岛之前的荒野漫游反映了之后的荒野漫游。它以一个伟大的神显灵来证明,并以契约的形式设定为以色列对她神圣的宗主国的忠诚回应。她指出,这两块石碑位于这个国家的心脏地带,在至圣所。所有这些都把十诫,以及其中的诫命,作为契约公式的强化,“我要作你们的上帝,你们要作我的子民。”在她的最后一章中,艾姆斯运用隐喻理论建立了“名字命令”应该被理解的概念域。参考前几章的工作,她得出结论,“名字”的隐喻代表了耶和华对所有权的要求,而“承载”的隐喻属于“服从是一段旅程”的概念领域。所有权理念与上面讨论的品牌主题有关,也与神选有关。因此,以上帝之名命名,对他的声誉有着深远的影响。她在书的结尾讨论了大祭司的任命协议和法衣,鉴于他作为以色列代表的地位,带着以色列的名字和耶和华的名字进入圣所。这是一种细致的学术模式,结果是有意义的训诂效益。这是对《摩西五经》学术的重要补充,将惠及更广泛的领域,特别是对牧师和其他希望认真对待《旧约》的基督徒。海伦·佩恩特圣经与暴力研究中心,布里斯托尔,英国BS 91 DF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Reviews: Walking the Ancient Paths: A Commentary on Jeremiah, by Walter C. Kaiser Jr. with Tiberius Rata
tions, such as idolatry, falsely swearing by the name of God, violating a covenant made at the Temple, or a priest eating sacred food while profane. Imes likewise examines nś to bear; šwʾ, which with the lamed prefix is probably best rendered in vain, and nqh. She argues that nqh should be viewed in the context of the evident intertextuality between the Name Command and Yahweh’s self-revelation in Exodus 34:6–7, hence render innocent. Having considered the canonical and early historical context of these words, Imes then (chapter four) proceeds to examine them as part of the Decalogue in narrative context. The decalogue stands at the peak, quite literally, of a great chiasm where the wilderness wanderings prior to Sinai are mirrored in the wilderness wanderings that follow it. It is attested with a great theophany, and is set in covenantal terms as the loyal response expected of Israel to her divine suzerain. She notes that the two stone tablets were located at the very heart of the nation, in the Holy of Holies. All of these position the decalogue, and the Name Command within it, as a reinforcement of the covenant formula, “I will be your God and you will be my people.” In her final chapter, Imes employs metaphor theory to establish the conceptual domains within which the Name Command should be understood. With reference to the work of the previous chapters, she concludes that the metaphor of “Name” stands for Yahweh’s claim to ownership, and the metaphor of “Bearing” falls within the conceptual domain of “Obedience is a journey.” The ownership idea relates to the branding motif discussed above, and to divine election. To bear the name of the Lord, then, has deep implications for his reputation. She closes the book with a discussion of the High Priest’s ordination protocols and vestments, in view of his status as representative of Israel, bearing both Israel’s name and Yahweh’s into the sanctuary. This is a model of meticulous scholarship that results in meaningful exegetical benefit. It is a significant addition to Pentateuch scholarship and will be of benefit more widely, particularly to pastors and other Christians who wish to take the Old Testament seriously. Helen Paynter Centre for the Study of Bible & Violence Bristol, UK BS 9 1 DF
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Biblical Theology Bulletin is a distinctive, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal containing articles and reviews written by experts in biblical and theological studies. The editors select articles that provide insights derived from critical biblical scholarship, culture-awareness, and thoughtful reflection on meanings of import for scholars of Bible and religion, religious educators, clergy, and those engaged with social studies in religion, inter-religious studies, and the praxis of biblical religion today. The journal began publication in 1971. It has been distinguished for its early and continuing publication of articles using the social sciences in addition to other critical methods for interpreting the Bible for contemporary readers, teachers, and preachers across cultural and denominational lines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信