既往剖宫产与先兆子痫风险:荟萃分析

Q3 Nursing
E. Jenabi, S. Khazaei, S. Aghababaei
{"title":"既往剖宫产与先兆子痫风险:荟萃分析","authors":"E. Jenabi, S. Khazaei, S. Aghababaei","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication with the multisystem variable disorder. Yet, the literature has not been systematically reviewed for the relationship between previous cesarean section and the risk of preeclampsia. Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between previous cesarean delivery and the risk of preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Sciences were searched to identify eligible observational studies until May 25, 2019. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as random effect estimates of association among studies. The quality of the included studies was examined based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: This study included 7 eligible articles (2 studies with a case-control design, 4 with a cohort design, and 1 with a cross-sectional design). The meta-analysis results showed an increased risk of preeclampsia in the women with previous cesarean section compared to women without cesarean section (OR=1.28, 95% CI, 1.15%-1.41%, P=0.001), I2=37.2%. The quality of all studies except one study was high based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The subgroup analysis was conducted based on the adjusted form of studies. The crude and adjusted studies were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.13%-2.46%, P=0.2) and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22%-1.36%, P=0.001), respectively. Conclusion: These findings showed that previous cesarean section is a risk factor for preeclampsia. Therefore, education programs and interventions should be considered to reduce elective cesarean section on maternal requests.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Previous Cesarean Section and the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Jenabi, S. Khazaei, S. Aghababaei\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication with the multisystem variable disorder. Yet, the literature has not been systematically reviewed for the relationship between previous cesarean section and the risk of preeclampsia. Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between previous cesarean delivery and the risk of preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Sciences were searched to identify eligible observational studies until May 25, 2019. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as random effect estimates of association among studies. The quality of the included studies was examined based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: This study included 7 eligible articles (2 studies with a case-control design, 4 with a cohort design, and 1 with a cross-sectional design). The meta-analysis results showed an increased risk of preeclampsia in the women with previous cesarean section compared to women without cesarean section (OR=1.28, 95% CI, 1.15%-1.41%, P=0.001), I2=37.2%. The quality of all studies except one study was high based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The subgroup analysis was conducted based on the adjusted form of studies. The crude and adjusted studies were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.13%-2.46%, P=0.2) and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22%-1.36%, P=0.001), respectively. Conclusion: These findings showed that previous cesarean section is a risk factor for preeclampsia. Therefore, education programs and interventions should be considered to reduce elective cesarean section on maternal requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先兆子痫是一种常见的妊娠并发症与多系统变量障碍。然而,文献还没有系统地回顾以前剖宫产和子痫前期风险之间的关系。目的:本研究旨在确定既往剖宫产与子痫前期风险的关系。材料和方法:本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析。检索PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest和Web of Sciences以确定符合条件的观察性研究,直至2019年5月25日。计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)作为研究间关联的随机效应估计。纳入研究的质量根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行检查。结果:本研究纳入7篇符合条件的文章(2篇为病例对照设计,4篇为队列设计,1篇为横断面设计)。meta分析结果显示,有剖宫产史的妇女发生先兆子痫的风险比没有剖宫产史的妇女高(OR=1.28, 95% CI, 1.15% ~ 1.41%, P=0.001), I2=37.2%。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,除一项研究外,所有研究的质量都很高。根据调整后的研究形式进行亚组分析。原始研究和调整后的研究分别为1.29 (95% CI, 0.13% ~ 2.46%, P=0.2)和1.29 (95% CI, 1.22% ~ 1.36%, P=0.001)。结论:既往剖宫产是子痫前期发生的危险因素。因此,应考虑教育方案和干预措施,以减少选择性剖宫产产妇的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Previous Cesarean Section and the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Meta-analysis
Introduction: Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication with the multisystem variable disorder. Yet, the literature has not been systematically reviewed for the relationship between previous cesarean section and the risk of preeclampsia. Objective: This study aimed to identify the relationship between previous cesarean delivery and the risk of preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Web of Sciences were searched to identify eligible observational studies until May 25, 2019. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated as random effect estimates of association among studies. The quality of the included studies was examined based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: This study included 7 eligible articles (2 studies with a case-control design, 4 with a cohort design, and 1 with a cross-sectional design). The meta-analysis results showed an increased risk of preeclampsia in the women with previous cesarean section compared to women without cesarean section (OR=1.28, 95% CI, 1.15%-1.41%, P=0.001), I2=37.2%. The quality of all studies except one study was high based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The subgroup analysis was conducted based on the adjusted form of studies. The crude and adjusted studies were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.13%-2.46%, P=0.2) and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22%-1.36%, P=0.001), respectively. Conclusion: These findings showed that previous cesarean section is a risk factor for preeclampsia. Therefore, education programs and interventions should be considered to reduce elective cesarean section on maternal requests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信