基于区域气候模式集合估算地表气温预估精度的最小二乘方法

IF 0.6 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
S.V. Krakovskа, L. Palamarchuk, Ye.L. Аzarov, А.Yu. Chyharеvа, Т.М. Shpytаl
{"title":"基于区域气候模式集合估算地表气温预估精度的最小二乘方法","authors":"S.V. Krakovskа, L. Palamarchuk, Ye.L. Аzarov, А.Yu. Chyharеvа, Т.М. Shpytаl","doi":"10.24028/gj.v44i5.272326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is devoted to the search for the optimal methodical approach for bias correction of surface air temperature from real climatic indicators for the territory of Ukraine, obtained in the projections of ensembles of regional climate models (RCM) based on the use of regression analysis, namely the least squares method (LSM) with various options of its application. The procedure included: searching for weight coefficients of linear regression equations to minimize the deviation of the forecast from the observations for each model and each grid node of the 10 RCM for two climatic periods 1961—1990 and 1991—2010; obtaining, on the basis of equations with established coefficients, the averaged errors of ensembles of models for various variants of LSM application; and determining the limits of the application of such methodical approaches to the formation of an optimal ensemble. \nAmong all options for using forecasting functions, it was found that the most accurate was the option of applying LSM to differences (shifts) in values between periods when one uses monthly values of the climate indicator. In general, the use of monthly values showed the best approximation of the model data to the observation data used from the E-OBS database. \nIt was found that in a certain period the approximation of the LSM is significantly better than the average, but the advantage is lost if the obtained weighting factors are used in another period. For further use, the proposed approach can be modernized in the direction of more detailed clustering in time and space, which will allow adjusting the model data even closer to the observed ones. However, our results make us doubt the feasibility of applying such an approach to the forecast of climate fields, since they are not stationary and can significantly transform over time. In this case, arithmetic averaging and averaging of shifts or the delta method remain the optimal choice for forming a prognostic ensemble of RCM.","PeriodicalId":54141,"journal":{"name":"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The least squares method in estimating the accuracy of surface air temperature projections based on ensembles of regional climate models\",\"authors\":\"S.V. Krakovskа, L. Palamarchuk, Ye.L. Аzarov, А.Yu. Chyharеvа, Т.М. Shpytаl\",\"doi\":\"10.24028/gj.v44i5.272326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study is devoted to the search for the optimal methodical approach for bias correction of surface air temperature from real climatic indicators for the territory of Ukraine, obtained in the projections of ensembles of regional climate models (RCM) based on the use of regression analysis, namely the least squares method (LSM) with various options of its application. The procedure included: searching for weight coefficients of linear regression equations to minimize the deviation of the forecast from the observations for each model and each grid node of the 10 RCM for two climatic periods 1961—1990 and 1991—2010; obtaining, on the basis of equations with established coefficients, the averaged errors of ensembles of models for various variants of LSM application; and determining the limits of the application of such methodical approaches to the formation of an optimal ensemble. \\nAmong all options for using forecasting functions, it was found that the most accurate was the option of applying LSM to differences (shifts) in values between periods when one uses monthly values of the climate indicator. In general, the use of monthly values showed the best approximation of the model data to the observation data used from the E-OBS database. \\nIt was found that in a certain period the approximation of the LSM is significantly better than the average, but the advantage is lost if the obtained weighting factors are used in another period. For further use, the proposed approach can be modernized in the direction of more detailed clustering in time and space, which will allow adjusting the model data even closer to the observed ones. However, our results make us doubt the feasibility of applying such an approach to the forecast of climate fields, since they are not stationary and can significantly transform over time. In this case, arithmetic averaging and averaging of shifts or the delta method remain the optimal choice for forming a prognostic ensemble of RCM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i5.272326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i5.272326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究致力于寻找从乌克兰领土的实际气候指标中获得的地表气温偏差校正的最佳方法,该方法是基于使用回归分析的区域气候模式(RCM)的预测集合中获得的,即最小二乘法(LSM)及其应用的各种选择。程序包括:寻找线性回归方程的权重系数,以最小化1961—1990年和1991—2010年两个气候期每个模式和10 RCM每个网格节点的预报与观测值的偏差;根据已建立的系数方程,得到LSM应用的各种变量的模型集的平均误差;并确定应用这种系统方法来形成最佳集合的限制。在使用预测函数的所有选项中,发现当使用气候指标的月值时,最准确的是将LSM应用于不同时期之间值的差异(移位)。一般来说,使用月值显示模式数据与E-OBS数据库中使用的观测数据的最佳近似。结果表明,在一定时期内,LSM的逼近性明显优于平均值,但如果将所得的加权因子用于另一个时期,这种优势就会丧失。为了进一步使用,所提出的方法可以在时间和空间上进行更详细的聚类,这将允许调整模型数据更接近观察到的数据。然而,我们的结果使我们怀疑将这种方法应用于气候场预测的可行性,因为它们不是固定的,并且可以随时间发生显著变化。在这种情况下,算术平均和移位平均或delta方法仍然是形成RCM预测集合的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The least squares method in estimating the accuracy of surface air temperature projections based on ensembles of regional climate models
The study is devoted to the search for the optimal methodical approach for bias correction of surface air temperature from real climatic indicators for the territory of Ukraine, obtained in the projections of ensembles of regional climate models (RCM) based on the use of regression analysis, namely the least squares method (LSM) with various options of its application. The procedure included: searching for weight coefficients of linear regression equations to minimize the deviation of the forecast from the observations for each model and each grid node of the 10 RCM for two climatic periods 1961—1990 and 1991—2010; obtaining, on the basis of equations with established coefficients, the averaged errors of ensembles of models for various variants of LSM application; and determining the limits of the application of such methodical approaches to the formation of an optimal ensemble. Among all options for using forecasting functions, it was found that the most accurate was the option of applying LSM to differences (shifts) in values between periods when one uses monthly values of the climate indicator. In general, the use of monthly values showed the best approximation of the model data to the observation data used from the E-OBS database. It was found that in a certain period the approximation of the LSM is significantly better than the average, but the advantage is lost if the obtained weighting factors are used in another period. For further use, the proposed approach can be modernized in the direction of more detailed clustering in time and space, which will allow adjusting the model data even closer to the observed ones. However, our results make us doubt the feasibility of applying such an approach to the forecast of climate fields, since they are not stationary and can significantly transform over time. In this case, arithmetic averaging and averaging of shifts or the delta method remain the optimal choice for forming a prognostic ensemble of RCM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal
Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
60.00%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信