因果模型:两种文化

Elizabeth L. Ogburn, I. Shpitser
{"title":"因果模型:两种文化","authors":"Elizabeth L. Ogburn, I. Shpitser","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We offer descriptive and normative standards for the principled pursuit of causal inference. These standards address critiques of both the algorithmic and the data modeling cultures identified in (Breiman, 2001), and provide a fruitful synthesis of both cultures. We contrast the resulting \"cautious causal inference\" with overly optimistic methods inspired by algorithmic data analysis methods prevalent in machine learning, as well as older approaches to causal modeling that employ overly restrictive parametric models.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0006","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Modelling: The Two Cultures\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L. Ogburn, I. Shpitser\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2021.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:We offer descriptive and normative standards for the principled pursuit of causal inference. These standards address critiques of both the algorithmic and the data modeling cultures identified in (Breiman, 2001), and provide a fruitful synthesis of both cultures. We contrast the resulting \\\"cautious causal inference\\\" with overly optimistic methods inspired by algorithmic data analysis methods prevalent in machine learning, as well as older approaches to causal modeling that employ overly restrictive parametric models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0006\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:我们为因果推理的原则性追求提供了描述性和规范性的标准。这些标准解决了(Breiman, 2001)中对算法和数据建模文化的批评,并提供了两种文化的富有成效的综合。我们将由此产生的“谨慎因果推理”与机器学习中流行的算法数据分析方法所启发的过于乐观的方法,以及采用过度限制参数模型的旧因果建模方法进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Modelling: The Two Cultures
Abstract:We offer descriptive and normative standards for the principled pursuit of causal inference. These standards address critiques of both the algorithmic and the data modeling cultures identified in (Breiman, 2001), and provide a fruitful synthesis of both cultures. We contrast the resulting "cautious causal inference" with overly optimistic methods inspired by algorithmic data analysis methods prevalent in machine learning, as well as older approaches to causal modeling that employ overly restrictive parametric models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信