仲裁金融纠纷——它们不同吗?未来会怎样?

Q3 Social Sciences
W. Blair, Gökçe Uyar, Grace Cheng, Yang Zhao
{"title":"仲裁金融纠纷——它们不同吗?未来会怎样?","authors":"W. Blair, Gökçe Uyar, Grace Cheng, Yang Zhao","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiac001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of this article is arbitrating financial disputes that arise from financings and financial products, usually in the international context, and typically of higher value. The article looks at how the subject has developed in China’s financial markets, as well as those of the West. It concludes that some financial disputes do have different characteristics from other commercial disputes, depending on the type of dispute in question. Though financial transactions often provide for the courts to have jurisdiction, particularly the courts of major financial centres, arbitration is in fact also widely used in financial disputes. An important consideration for financial institutions is the recent and widespread introduction of rules as to ‘early determination’ by many arbitral institutions. A potentiality of these is to make arbitration more ‘finance friendly’ for financial institutions, and their counterparties, but there remains a reluctance on the part of tribunals to use them. Some of the principal components of the practical application of ‘early determination’ provisions are clarified in the article. Finally, some views are offered on what may lie ahead for the arbitration of financial disputes, particularly in the field of technology and green finance.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitrating financial disputes—are they different and what lies ahead?\",\"authors\":\"W. Blair, Gökçe Uyar, Grace Cheng, Yang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arbint/aiac001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The subject of this article is arbitrating financial disputes that arise from financings and financial products, usually in the international context, and typically of higher value. The article looks at how the subject has developed in China’s financial markets, as well as those of the West. It concludes that some financial disputes do have different characteristics from other commercial disputes, depending on the type of dispute in question. Though financial transactions often provide for the courts to have jurisdiction, particularly the courts of major financial centres, arbitration is in fact also widely used in financial disputes. An important consideration for financial institutions is the recent and widespread introduction of rules as to ‘early determination’ by many arbitral institutions. A potentiality of these is to make arbitration more ‘finance friendly’ for financial institutions, and their counterparties, but there remains a reluctance on the part of tribunals to use them. Some of the principal components of the practical application of ‘early determination’ provisions are clarified in the article. Finally, some views are offered on what may lie ahead for the arbitration of financial disputes, particularly in the field of technology and green finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitration International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitration International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitration International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本条的主题是仲裁由融资和金融产品引起的金融纠纷,通常是在国际背景下,通常价值更高。这篇文章着眼于这一主题在中国和西方金融市场的发展。结论是,根据所涉纠纷的类型,一些金融纠纷确实具有与其他商业纠纷不同的特点。尽管金融交易通常规定法院,特别是主要金融中心的法院具有管辖权,但仲裁实际上也广泛用于金融纠纷。金融机构的一个重要考虑因素是,许多仲裁机构最近普遍引入了关于“提前裁决”的规则。其中一个潜力是使仲裁对金融机构及其交易对手更加“金融友好”,但仲裁庭仍不愿使用仲裁。该条阐明了“早期裁定”条款实际适用的一些主要组成部分。最后,就金融纠纷仲裁的前景,特别是在技术和绿色金融领域,提出了一些看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitrating financial disputes—are they different and what lies ahead?
The subject of this article is arbitrating financial disputes that arise from financings and financial products, usually in the international context, and typically of higher value. The article looks at how the subject has developed in China’s financial markets, as well as those of the West. It concludes that some financial disputes do have different characteristics from other commercial disputes, depending on the type of dispute in question. Though financial transactions often provide for the courts to have jurisdiction, particularly the courts of major financial centres, arbitration is in fact also widely used in financial disputes. An important consideration for financial institutions is the recent and widespread introduction of rules as to ‘early determination’ by many arbitral institutions. A potentiality of these is to make arbitration more ‘finance friendly’ for financial institutions, and their counterparties, but there remains a reluctance on the part of tribunals to use them. Some of the principal components of the practical application of ‘early determination’ provisions are clarified in the article. Finally, some views are offered on what may lie ahead for the arbitration of financial disputes, particularly in the field of technology and green finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arbitration International
Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信