{"title":"I'jaz al-Qur’ān al-Karim(对历史话语和维度的评价)","authors":"Soumia Aziz, Shah Junaid Ahmad Hashimi","doi":"10.36476/jirs.3:1.06.2018.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at an evaluation of various approaches to define and redefine the classical theory of the I‘jaz (the inimitability of the Qur’ān) in the perspective of the challenges and problems faced by the Muslim society emphasising a need to cope with the rational thinking, modernity, scientific progress, psychological advancement and civilizational development, though there has been a comparatively lesser description of the rhetoricism of the Qur’ān too. It provides an account of scholarship exploring some novel dimensions of the matchlessness of the Qur’ān in the contemporaneous context. They have justified rationally and psychologically the Qur’ānic historic challenge of producing a book or its some surahs or few verses similar to the Qur’ān that has offered the irresistible call to the whole mankind: “Say: “If the whole of mankind and Jinns were to gather together to produce the like of this Qur’ān, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they backed up each other with help and support”. (Al-Isra 17: 88) The same challenge occurs in the Qur’ān on three previous occasions (Al-Baqarah, 2: 23-24; Yunus 10: 38, and Hūd 11:13) and later also in al-Tūr (52: 33-34). The content of all the verses referred to above is in response to the allegation of the unbelievers that the Qur’ān had been composed by the Prophet (peace be on him) and then falsely ascribed to God. All this was refuted. This refutation of the Qur’ān was logically established by the modern Arabic scholars through their sound arguments.","PeriodicalId":56212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I’jaz al-Qur’ān al-Karim (An Evaluation of Historical Discourse and Dimensions)\",\"authors\":\"Soumia Aziz, Shah Junaid Ahmad Hashimi\",\"doi\":\"10.36476/jirs.3:1.06.2018.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims at an evaluation of various approaches to define and redefine the classical theory of the I‘jaz (the inimitability of the Qur’ān) in the perspective of the challenges and problems faced by the Muslim society emphasising a need to cope with the rational thinking, modernity, scientific progress, psychological advancement and civilizational development, though there has been a comparatively lesser description of the rhetoricism of the Qur’ān too. It provides an account of scholarship exploring some novel dimensions of the matchlessness of the Qur’ān in the contemporaneous context. They have justified rationally and psychologically the Qur’ānic historic challenge of producing a book or its some surahs or few verses similar to the Qur’ān that has offered the irresistible call to the whole mankind: “Say: “If the whole of mankind and Jinns were to gather together to produce the like of this Qur’ān, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they backed up each other with help and support”. (Al-Isra 17: 88) The same challenge occurs in the Qur’ān on three previous occasions (Al-Baqarah, 2: 23-24; Yunus 10: 38, and Hūd 11:13) and later also in al-Tūr (52: 33-34). The content of all the verses referred to above is in response to the allegation of the unbelievers that the Qur’ān had been composed by the Prophet (peace be on him) and then falsely ascribed to God. All this was refuted. This refutation of the Qur’ān was logically established by the modern Arabic scholars through their sound arguments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36476/jirs.3:1.06.2018.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36476/jirs.3:1.06.2018.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文旨在从穆斯林社会面临的挑战和问题的角度,评估各种定义和重新定义经典理论的方法(古兰经的不可模仿性ān),强调需要应对理性思维,现代性,科学进步,心理进步和文明发展,尽管对古兰经修辞学的描述相对较少ān也。它提供了一个学术帐户,探索古兰经ān在同时代的背景下无与伦比的一些新颖的维度。他们从理性和心理上证明了古兰经ānic的历史性挑战,即制作一本类似古兰经ān的书或它的一些章节或几节经文,向全人类提供了不可抗拒的召唤:“说:“如果全人类和精灵聚集在一起制作像这本古兰经ān一样的书,他们不可能制作出这样的书,即使他们互相帮助和支持”。(al - israel 17:8 8)同样的挑战在古兰经ān中出现过三次(Al-Baqarah, 2:23 -24;尤努斯10:38,Hūd 11:13),后来也在al-Tūr(52:33 -34)。上面提到的所有经文的内容都是为了回应不信的人的指控,即古兰经ān是由先知(愿主福安之)创作的,然后被错误地归咎于真主。所有这些都被驳斥了。这种对古兰经ān的反驳是由现代阿拉伯学者通过他们合理的论证在逻辑上建立起来的。
I’jaz al-Qur’ān al-Karim (An Evaluation of Historical Discourse and Dimensions)
This paper aims at an evaluation of various approaches to define and redefine the classical theory of the I‘jaz (the inimitability of the Qur’ān) in the perspective of the challenges and problems faced by the Muslim society emphasising a need to cope with the rational thinking, modernity, scientific progress, psychological advancement and civilizational development, though there has been a comparatively lesser description of the rhetoricism of the Qur’ān too. It provides an account of scholarship exploring some novel dimensions of the matchlessness of the Qur’ān in the contemporaneous context. They have justified rationally and psychologically the Qur’ānic historic challenge of producing a book or its some surahs or few verses similar to the Qur’ān that has offered the irresistible call to the whole mankind: “Say: “If the whole of mankind and Jinns were to gather together to produce the like of this Qur’ān, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they backed up each other with help and support”. (Al-Isra 17: 88) The same challenge occurs in the Qur’ān on three previous occasions (Al-Baqarah, 2: 23-24; Yunus 10: 38, and Hūd 11:13) and later also in al-Tūr (52: 33-34). The content of all the verses referred to above is in response to the allegation of the unbelievers that the Qur’ān had been composed by the Prophet (peace be on him) and then falsely ascribed to God. All this was refuted. This refutation of the Qur’ān was logically established by the modern Arabic scholars through their sound arguments.