{"title":"公民喜欢谈论死亡和学习临终关怀——一项对5469名临终援助课程参与者的观点和经历进行的混合方法研究","authors":"G. Bollig, Frans Brandt Kristensen, D. L. Wolff","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Most people would prefer to die at home. Engaging citizens in end-of-life care may contribute to making home death possible for more people. Aims To test the feasibility and acceptability of Last Aid Courses in different countries and to explore the views and experiences of participants with the course. Methods International multi-centre study with a questionnaire based mixed methods design. 408 Last Aid Courses were held in three different countries. Of 6014 course participants, 5469 participated in the study accounting for a response rate of 91%. Results The median age of participants was 56 years. 88% were female. 76% of participants rated the course “very good”. 99% would recommend it to others. Findings from the qualitative data revealed that participants found the atmosphere comfortable; instructors competent; appreciated the course format, duration, topics and discussions about life and death. Conclusions Last Aid Courses are both feasible and accepted by citizens from different countries. They have a huge potential to inform citizens and to encourage them to engage in care at home. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of the course on the ability and willingness of participants to provide end-of-life care and the impact on the number of home-deaths.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens appreciate talking about death and learning end-of-life care – a mixed-methods study on views and experiences of 5469 Last Aid Course participants\",\"authors\":\"G. Bollig, Frans Brandt Kristensen, D. L. Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Most people would prefer to die at home. Engaging citizens in end-of-life care may contribute to making home death possible for more people. Aims To test the feasibility and acceptability of Last Aid Courses in different countries and to explore the views and experiences of participants with the course. Methods International multi-centre study with a questionnaire based mixed methods design. 408 Last Aid Courses were held in three different countries. Of 6014 course participants, 5469 participated in the study accounting for a response rate of 91%. Results The median age of participants was 56 years. 88% were female. 76% of participants rated the course “very good”. 99% would recommend it to others. Findings from the qualitative data revealed that participants found the atmosphere comfortable; instructors competent; appreciated the course format, duration, topics and discussions about life and death. Conclusions Last Aid Courses are both feasible and accepted by citizens from different countries. They have a huge potential to inform citizens and to encourage them to engage in care at home. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of the course on the ability and willingness of participants to provide end-of-life care and the impact on the number of home-deaths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1887590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Citizens appreciate talking about death and learning end-of-life care – a mixed-methods study on views and experiences of 5469 Last Aid Course participants
Background Most people would prefer to die at home. Engaging citizens in end-of-life care may contribute to making home death possible for more people. Aims To test the feasibility and acceptability of Last Aid Courses in different countries and to explore the views and experiences of participants with the course. Methods International multi-centre study with a questionnaire based mixed methods design. 408 Last Aid Courses were held in three different countries. Of 6014 course participants, 5469 participated in the study accounting for a response rate of 91%. Results The median age of participants was 56 years. 88% were female. 76% of participants rated the course “very good”. 99% would recommend it to others. Findings from the qualitative data revealed that participants found the atmosphere comfortable; instructors competent; appreciated the course format, duration, topics and discussions about life and death. Conclusions Last Aid Courses are both feasible and accepted by citizens from different countries. They have a huge potential to inform citizens and to encourage them to engage in care at home. Future research should investigate the long-term effects of the course on the ability and willingness of participants to provide end-of-life care and the impact on the number of home-deaths.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.