电子谈判中的让步交叉

Q4 Engineering
R. Carbonneau, R. Vahidov, Bo Yu
{"title":"电子谈判中的让步交叉","authors":"R. Carbonneau, R. Vahidov, Bo Yu","doi":"10.2478/candc-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Negotiation is a joint decision making process involving making concessions by the parties. Concession-making may involve giving up negotiator’s utility and is an essential activity in the negotiation process. In the past it has been suggested by some authors that negotiators utility functions over the issues may not be linear. In this case, a phenomenon called “concession crossover” takes place, in which a negotiator may switch issues on which they choose to make concessions at some point in negotiations. This work sets to investigate the validity of such claims. To this end we introduce several concession-making models and use them for testing hypotheses. We have used a dataset from online negotiation experiments featuring a contract-signing case. The results support the claim that concession crossover does indeed occur.","PeriodicalId":55209,"journal":{"name":"Control and Cybernetics","volume":"50 1","pages":"51 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concession crossover in electronic negotiations\",\"authors\":\"R. Carbonneau, R. Vahidov, Bo Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/candc-2021-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Negotiation is a joint decision making process involving making concessions by the parties. Concession-making may involve giving up negotiator’s utility and is an essential activity in the negotiation process. In the past it has been suggested by some authors that negotiators utility functions over the issues may not be linear. In this case, a phenomenon called “concession crossover” takes place, in which a negotiator may switch issues on which they choose to make concessions at some point in negotiations. This work sets to investigate the validity of such claims. To this end we introduce several concession-making models and use them for testing hypotheses. We have used a dataset from online negotiation experiments featuring a contract-signing case. The results support the claim that concession crossover does indeed occur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control and Cybernetics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control and Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/candc-2021-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/candc-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要谈判是一个涉及各方做出让步的联合决策过程。让步可能涉及放弃谈判者的效用,是谈判过程中的一项重要活动。过去,一些作者认为,谈判者在问题上的效用函数可能不是线性的。在这种情况下,会出现一种被称为“让步交叉”的现象,即谈判代表可能会在谈判的某个时刻改变他们选择做出让步的问题。这项工作旨在调查这些说法的有效性。为此,我们介绍了几个让步模型,并用它们来检验假设。我们使用了一个来自在线谈判实验的数据集,其中包含一个合同签署案例。结果支持了让步交叉确实发生的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concession crossover in electronic negotiations
Abstract Negotiation is a joint decision making process involving making concessions by the parties. Concession-making may involve giving up negotiator’s utility and is an essential activity in the negotiation process. In the past it has been suggested by some authors that negotiators utility functions over the issues may not be linear. In this case, a phenomenon called “concession crossover” takes place, in which a negotiator may switch issues on which they choose to make concessions at some point in negotiations. This work sets to investigate the validity of such claims. To this end we introduce several concession-making models and use them for testing hypotheses. We have used a dataset from online negotiation experiments featuring a contract-signing case. The results support the claim that concession crossover does indeed occur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Control and Cybernetics
Control and Cybernetics 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The field of interest covers general concepts, theories, methods and techniques associated with analysis, modelling, control and management in various systems (e.g. technological, economic, ecological, social). The journal is particularly interested in results in the following areas of research: Systems and control theory: general systems theory, optimal cotrol, optimization theory, data analysis, learning, artificial intelligence, modelling & identification, game theory, multicriteria optimisation, decision and negotiation methods, soft approaches: stochastic and fuzzy methods, computer science,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信