欧盟-中国全面投资协定:印尼的经验教训

IF 3.7 Q1 ECONOMICS
Lili Yan Ing, J. J. Losari
{"title":"欧盟-中国全面投资协定:印尼的经验教训","authors":"Lili Yan Ing, J. J. Losari","doi":"10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"30 December 2020 marked a historical landscape for the European Union (EU) and China as they reached an agreement in principle on investment agreement known as the EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) after 35 rounds of negotiations since February 2012 (European Commission 2021c). Although its future is unclear amid the ongoing tension between the EU and China (Peel and Fleming 2021), the CAI was originally expected to come into force after 2022. Our paper aims to assess specific concessions made by the EU and China and provides lessons learnt for Indonesia on the ongoing negotiation of the Indonesia–EU free trade agreement (FTA), so-called the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (the IEU CEPA). The negotiation was launched on 18 July 2016, and at the time of writing, there had been 10 rounds of negotiations (European Commission 2021b). Although some believe that CAI would replace the existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between China and the EU Member States (Jones Day 2021), the text of CAI indicates otherwise. China has BITs with almost all EU Member States, save for Ireland, with a total of 25 BITs. Despite having CAI as an investment agreement, China and the EU Member States do not terminate these existing BITs as Section VI of CAI clarifies that previous agreements between the Member States of the EU/the European Community and China are not superseded or terminated by the agreement. Thus, the BITs will remain in effect alongside CAI unless China and the EU Member States decide otherwise in the future. Section 2 presents a comprehensive overview of the main areas covered under CAI. Section 3 assesses potential impacts of CAI on Indonesia’s investment. Section 4 evaluates the current state of the IEU CEPA negotiations and lessons learnt from CAI. Section 5 concludes and offers policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":45279,"journal":{"name":"China Economic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU—China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: Lessons Learnt for Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Lili Yan Ing, J. J. Losari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"30 December 2020 marked a historical landscape for the European Union (EU) and China as they reached an agreement in principle on investment agreement known as the EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) after 35 rounds of negotiations since February 2012 (European Commission 2021c). Although its future is unclear amid the ongoing tension between the EU and China (Peel and Fleming 2021), the CAI was originally expected to come into force after 2022. Our paper aims to assess specific concessions made by the EU and China and provides lessons learnt for Indonesia on the ongoing negotiation of the Indonesia–EU free trade agreement (FTA), so-called the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (the IEU CEPA). The negotiation was launched on 18 July 2016, and at the time of writing, there had been 10 rounds of negotiations (European Commission 2021b). Although some believe that CAI would replace the existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between China and the EU Member States (Jones Day 2021), the text of CAI indicates otherwise. China has BITs with almost all EU Member States, save for Ireland, with a total of 25 BITs. Despite having CAI as an investment agreement, China and the EU Member States do not terminate these existing BITs as Section VI of CAI clarifies that previous agreements between the Member States of the EU/the European Community and China are not superseded or terminated by the agreement. Thus, the BITs will remain in effect alongside CAI unless China and the EU Member States decide otherwise in the future. Section 2 presents a comprehensive overview of the main areas covered under CAI. Section 3 assesses potential impacts of CAI on Indonesia’s investment. Section 4 evaluates the current state of the IEU CEPA negotiations and lessons learnt from CAI. Section 5 concludes and offers policy recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1934147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2020年12月30日,经过2012年2月以来的35轮谈判(欧盟委员会2021c),欧盟和中国就投资协议达成了原则性协议,这标志着欧盟和中国的历史格局。尽管在欧盟和中国之间持续的紧张局势中,其未来尚不明朗(Peel and Fleming 2021),但CAI最初预计将在2022年之后生效。我们的论文旨在评估欧盟和中国做出的具体让步,并为印度尼西亚正在进行的印尼-欧盟自由贸易协定(FTA)谈判提供经验教训,即所谓的全面经济伙伴关系协定(IEU CEPA)。谈判于2016年7月18日启动,在撰写本文时,已经进行了10轮谈判(欧盟委员会2021b)。尽管一些人认为CAI将取代中国与欧盟成员国之间现有的双边投资条约(BITs) (Jones Day 2021),但CAI的文本表明并非如此。除爱尔兰外,中国与几乎所有欧盟成员国都签订了双边投资协定,共有25个双边投资协定。尽管《投资协定》是一项投资协定,但中国和欧盟成员国并不终止这些现有的双边投资协定,因为《投资协定》第六节澄清,欧盟/欧共体成员国与中国之间以前的协议不会被该协定取代或终止。因此,除非中国和欧盟成员国在未来另有决定,否则双边投资协定将与CAI一起继续有效。第2节介绍CAI所涵盖的主要领域的全面概述。第3节评估CAI对印尼投资的潜在影响。第四部分评估了欧盟CEPA谈判的现状和从CAI中吸取的教训。第5节总结并提出政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU—China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: Lessons Learnt for Indonesia
30 December 2020 marked a historical landscape for the European Union (EU) and China as they reached an agreement in principle on investment agreement known as the EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) after 35 rounds of negotiations since February 2012 (European Commission 2021c). Although its future is unclear amid the ongoing tension between the EU and China (Peel and Fleming 2021), the CAI was originally expected to come into force after 2022. Our paper aims to assess specific concessions made by the EU and China and provides lessons learnt for Indonesia on the ongoing negotiation of the Indonesia–EU free trade agreement (FTA), so-called the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (the IEU CEPA). The negotiation was launched on 18 July 2016, and at the time of writing, there had been 10 rounds of negotiations (European Commission 2021b). Although some believe that CAI would replace the existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between China and the EU Member States (Jones Day 2021), the text of CAI indicates otherwise. China has BITs with almost all EU Member States, save for Ireland, with a total of 25 BITs. Despite having CAI as an investment agreement, China and the EU Member States do not terminate these existing BITs as Section VI of CAI clarifies that previous agreements between the Member States of the EU/the European Community and China are not superseded or terminated by the agreement. Thus, the BITs will remain in effect alongside CAI unless China and the EU Member States decide otherwise in the future. Section 2 presents a comprehensive overview of the main areas covered under CAI. Section 3 assesses potential impacts of CAI on Indonesia’s investment. Section 4 evaluates the current state of the IEU CEPA negotiations and lessons learnt from CAI. Section 5 concludes and offers policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信