{"title":"跨学科公民教育在中学难以起飞的20个原因:一篇民族志综述","authors":"P. Brett","doi":"10.7459/ct/37.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper combines an autoethnographic approach with a literature review of general and discipline-specific research linked to the theme of cross-curricular citizenship education (“CE”) from the 1990s to the present. It identifies 20 reasons why cross-curricular CE struggles\n to take flight in secondary schools. These reasons are organized into four categories: structural, epistemological, attitudinal and pedagogical. While the focus is mainly upon citizenship education in England (and, to a lesser extent, in Australia), the paper suggests that the barriers identified\n exist in most nations.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty Reasons Why Cross-Curricular Citizenship Education Might Struggle to Take Flight in Secondary Schools: An Autoethnographic Review\",\"authors\":\"P. Brett\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/ct/37.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper combines an autoethnographic approach with a literature review of general and discipline-specific research linked to the theme of cross-curricular citizenship education (“CE”) from the 1990s to the present. It identifies 20 reasons why cross-curricular CE struggles\\n to take flight in secondary schools. These reasons are organized into four categories: structural, epistemological, attitudinal and pedagogical. While the focus is mainly upon citizenship education in England (and, to a lesser extent, in Australia), the paper suggests that the barriers identified\\n exist in most nations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Twenty Reasons Why Cross-Curricular Citizenship Education Might Struggle to Take Flight in Secondary Schools: An Autoethnographic Review
The paper combines an autoethnographic approach with a literature review of general and discipline-specific research linked to the theme of cross-curricular citizenship education (“CE”) from the 1990s to the present. It identifies 20 reasons why cross-curricular CE struggles
to take flight in secondary schools. These reasons are organized into four categories: structural, epistemological, attitudinal and pedagogical. While the focus is mainly upon citizenship education in England (and, to a lesser extent, in Australia), the paper suggests that the barriers identified
exist in most nations.
期刊介绍:
Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.