斯大林的世界:统治苏联秩序

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew E. Lenoe
{"title":"斯大林的世界:统治苏联秩序","authors":"Matthew E. Lenoe","doi":"10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"community’ have focused on its recent, post-1990s, history, and have utilized the rhetoric of modernization and Europeanization, while attempting to appease various ethnic-based demands and opposition to the latter. Ljupcho S. Risteski and Armanda Kodra Hysa provide a detailed analysis of the processes of redefinition that befell virtually all the key state and national symbols in Macedonia. Their excellent research points to an interesting finding that the public opinion poll data presented comparatively throughout the book do not, in fact, necessarily follow from (divisive) political discourses and (opposing) nationalist narratives promulgated by state elites, and luckily so. Cecilie Endresen concludes the volume with a chapter on Albania, a country with the second-best loyalty score. The state’s separate history and centennial of independent statehood makes the case stand out, though its previous communist regime offers interesting points for comparison with the six former Yugoslav republics or provinces. For students of nationalism, the challenge is to analyse Albania as a separate case due to its greater continuity of statehood in its present form. The concluding chapter, rather surprisingly, sums up three research hypotheses that were not introduced in the opening chapter, explicating how the authors had presumed that successful nation-building process (i.e. loyalty) would depend on (a) successful state-building, (b) level of democracy, and (c) homogeneity of the population. Only the third hypothesis was found to be supported by the survey data: ‘ethnic homogeneity is associated with levels of support more than any other factor’, while religion is importantly shown to be ‘intimately linked to ethnicity’ and not an independent factor (p. 231). Overall, this volumemakes a valuable contribution to the study of symbols, rituals and nationalist narratives in contemporary nation-building processes. It is a comparative project that elucidates how primordial idea(l)s of nationhood, essential for modern ‘invented traditions’ that enable nationalist elites to promulgate one select national identity, inevitably clash when competing nationalisms fight for primacy within the complexity of multiethnic, multiconfessional and multicultural realities of human existence.","PeriodicalId":41490,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONICA","volume":"22 1","pages":"117 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stalin's World: dictating the Soviet order\",\"authors\":\"Matthew E. Lenoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"community’ have focused on its recent, post-1990s, history, and have utilized the rhetoric of modernization and Europeanization, while attempting to appease various ethnic-based demands and opposition to the latter. Ljupcho S. Risteski and Armanda Kodra Hysa provide a detailed analysis of the processes of redefinition that befell virtually all the key state and national symbols in Macedonia. Their excellent research points to an interesting finding that the public opinion poll data presented comparatively throughout the book do not, in fact, necessarily follow from (divisive) political discourses and (opposing) nationalist narratives promulgated by state elites, and luckily so. Cecilie Endresen concludes the volume with a chapter on Albania, a country with the second-best loyalty score. The state’s separate history and centennial of independent statehood makes the case stand out, though its previous communist regime offers interesting points for comparison with the six former Yugoslav republics or provinces. For students of nationalism, the challenge is to analyse Albania as a separate case due to its greater continuity of statehood in its present form. The concluding chapter, rather surprisingly, sums up three research hypotheses that were not introduced in the opening chapter, explicating how the authors had presumed that successful nation-building process (i.e. loyalty) would depend on (a) successful state-building, (b) level of democracy, and (c) homogeneity of the population. Only the third hypothesis was found to be supported by the survey data: ‘ethnic homogeneity is associated with levels of support more than any other factor’, while religion is importantly shown to be ‘intimately linked to ethnicity’ and not an independent factor (p. 231). Overall, this volumemakes a valuable contribution to the study of symbols, rituals and nationalist narratives in contemporary nation-building processes. It is a comparative project that elucidates how primordial idea(l)s of nationhood, essential for modern ‘invented traditions’ that enable nationalist elites to promulgate one select national identity, inevitably clash when competing nationalisms fight for primacy within the complexity of multiethnic, multiconfessional and multicultural realities of human existence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLAVONICA\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLAVONICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617427.2017.1382765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

“共同体”关注其近代、90年代后的历史,并利用现代化和欧化的修辞,同时试图安抚各种基于民族的要求和对后者的反对。Ljupcho S. Risteski和amanda Kodra Hysa详细分析了马其顿几乎所有关键国家和民族象征所经历的重新定义过程。他们出色的研究指出了一个有趣的发现,即全书中相对呈现的民意调查数据,实际上不一定遵循(分裂的)政治话语和(对立的)国家精英所宣扬的民族主义叙事,幸运的是,这是必然的。塞西莉·恩德雷森在书的最后一章介绍了阿尔巴尼亚,这个国家的忠诚度排名第二。这个国家独立的历史和独立国家的百年纪念使得这个案例引人注目,尽管它之前的共产主义政权提供了与前南斯拉夫六个共和国或省份进行比较的有趣点。对于研究民族主义的学生来说,挑战在于把阿尔巴尼亚作为一个单独的案例来分析,因为它以目前的形式存在着更大的国家连续性。令人惊讶的是,最后一章总结了三个在第一章中没有介绍的研究假设,解释了作者如何假设成功的国家建设过程(即忠诚)取决于(a)成功的国家建设,(b)民主水平,以及(c)人口的同质性。只有第三种假设得到了调查数据的支持:“种族同质性与支持程度的关系比其他任何因素都要大”,而重要的是,宗教被证明“与种族密切相关”,而不是一个独立的因素(第231页)。总的来说,这本书对当代国家建设过程中的符号、仪式和民族主义叙事的研究做出了宝贵的贡献。这是一个比较的项目,阐明了民族主义的原始观念是如何不可避免地发生冲突的,当相互竞争的民族主义在人类存在的多种族、多信仰和多元文化现实的复杂性中争夺首要地位时,民族主义是如何对现代“发明的传统”至关重要的,这种传统使民族主义精英能够传播一种选择的民族身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stalin's World: dictating the Soviet order
community’ have focused on its recent, post-1990s, history, and have utilized the rhetoric of modernization and Europeanization, while attempting to appease various ethnic-based demands and opposition to the latter. Ljupcho S. Risteski and Armanda Kodra Hysa provide a detailed analysis of the processes of redefinition that befell virtually all the key state and national symbols in Macedonia. Their excellent research points to an interesting finding that the public opinion poll data presented comparatively throughout the book do not, in fact, necessarily follow from (divisive) political discourses and (opposing) nationalist narratives promulgated by state elites, and luckily so. Cecilie Endresen concludes the volume with a chapter on Albania, a country with the second-best loyalty score. The state’s separate history and centennial of independent statehood makes the case stand out, though its previous communist regime offers interesting points for comparison with the six former Yugoslav republics or provinces. For students of nationalism, the challenge is to analyse Albania as a separate case due to its greater continuity of statehood in its present form. The concluding chapter, rather surprisingly, sums up three research hypotheses that were not introduced in the opening chapter, explicating how the authors had presumed that successful nation-building process (i.e. loyalty) would depend on (a) successful state-building, (b) level of democracy, and (c) homogeneity of the population. Only the third hypothesis was found to be supported by the survey data: ‘ethnic homogeneity is associated with levels of support more than any other factor’, while religion is importantly shown to be ‘intimately linked to ethnicity’ and not an independent factor (p. 231). Overall, this volumemakes a valuable contribution to the study of symbols, rituals and nationalist narratives in contemporary nation-building processes. It is a comparative project that elucidates how primordial idea(l)s of nationhood, essential for modern ‘invented traditions’ that enable nationalist elites to promulgate one select national identity, inevitably clash when competing nationalisms fight for primacy within the complexity of multiethnic, multiconfessional and multicultural realities of human existence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SLAVONICA
SLAVONICA HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信