比较指导化疗中生长因子使用的风险模型

Chetan Jeurkar
{"title":"比较指导化疗中生长因子使用的风险模型","authors":"Chetan Jeurkar","doi":"10.12788/JCSO.0429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its corollary febrile neutropenia (FN) are well recognized, and they are serious consequences of many agents used in the treatment of malignancy. FN in particular has been associated with a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality, namely sepsis with multiorgan failure and eventual death.1 The mainstay of prophylaxis for patients who are deemed to be at high risk for CIN and FN is colony-stimulating factors (CSF). These agents have been shown to significantly decrease FN-related mortality, and therefore their use is potentially lifesaving.2 However, CSF are not cheap, with the cost of peg-filgrastim as much as US $6195.99 per cycle of chemotherapy.3 Therefore, not only do FN and CIN pose significant risk to patients, they also carry a high burden of cost to the patient and health care system both in treatment and prophylaxis.4 As such, it is prudent for oncologists to accurately identify high-risk patients and judiciously use CSF in an evidence-based manner. However, this has proven to be difficult because of the extent of variability between patients and the heterogeneity of the various risk models in the literature. Currently, there are 2 widely used guidelines, 1 developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and another by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Both guidelines suggest the use of prophylactic CSF if the chemotherapy regimen has an FN risk of more than 20% (high risk). If the chemotherapy is deemed to be of intermediate risk (10%-20% FN risk), then patient-specific factors need to be considered.5,6 In lung cancer, the NCCN lists only topotecan for small cell carcinomas as being high risk for FN, and therefore it is the only regimen that would warrant definitive use of prophylactic CSF.5 The most recent ASCO guidelines do not list chemotherapy regimens that are high risk for FN.6 For intermediate-risk regimens, the NCCN states that CSF prophylaxis should be considered if the patient has had previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, persistent neutropenia, bone marrow involvement by","PeriodicalId":75058,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of community and supportive oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing risk models guiding growth factor use in chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Chetan Jeurkar\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/JCSO.0429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its corollary febrile neutropenia (FN) are well recognized, and they are serious consequences of many agents used in the treatment of malignancy. FN in particular has been associated with a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality, namely sepsis with multiorgan failure and eventual death.1 The mainstay of prophylaxis for patients who are deemed to be at high risk for CIN and FN is colony-stimulating factors (CSF). These agents have been shown to significantly decrease FN-related mortality, and therefore their use is potentially lifesaving.2 However, CSF are not cheap, with the cost of peg-filgrastim as much as US $6195.99 per cycle of chemotherapy.3 Therefore, not only do FN and CIN pose significant risk to patients, they also carry a high burden of cost to the patient and health care system both in treatment and prophylaxis.4 As such, it is prudent for oncologists to accurately identify high-risk patients and judiciously use CSF in an evidence-based manner. However, this has proven to be difficult because of the extent of variability between patients and the heterogeneity of the various risk models in the literature. Currently, there are 2 widely used guidelines, 1 developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and another by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Both guidelines suggest the use of prophylactic CSF if the chemotherapy regimen has an FN risk of more than 20% (high risk). If the chemotherapy is deemed to be of intermediate risk (10%-20% FN risk), then patient-specific factors need to be considered.5,6 In lung cancer, the NCCN lists only topotecan for small cell carcinomas as being high risk for FN, and therefore it is the only regimen that would warrant definitive use of prophylactic CSF.5 The most recent ASCO guidelines do not list chemotherapy regimens that are high risk for FN.6 For intermediate-risk regimens, the NCCN states that CSF prophylaxis should be considered if the patient has had previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, persistent neutropenia, bone marrow involvement by\",\"PeriodicalId\":75058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of community and supportive oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of community and supportive oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/JCSO.0429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of community and supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/JCSO.0429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少症(CIN)及其伴随的发热性中性粒细胞增多症(FN)已被公认,它们是许多治疗恶性肿瘤的药物的严重后果。FN尤其与相当大的发病率和死亡率相关,即败血症伴多器官衰竭和最终死亡。1对于被认为是CIN和FN高危患者,预防的主要方法是集落刺激因子(CSF)。这些药物已被证明可以显著降低FN相关的死亡率,因此它们的使用有可能挽救生命。2然而,CSF并不便宜,每个化疗周期的聚乙二醇非格拉司汀成本高达6195.99美元。3因此,FN和CIN不仅对患者构成重大风险,它们在治疗和预防方面也给患者和医疗保健系统带来了高昂的成本负担。4因此,肿瘤学家应谨慎地准确识别高危患者,并以循证的方式明智地使用CSF。然而,由于患者之间的可变性程度和文献中各种风险模型的异质性,这已被证明是困难的。目前,有2个广泛使用的指南,1个由国家癌症综合网络(NCCN)开发,另一个由美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)开发。两份指南都建议,如果化疗方案的FN风险超过20%(高风险),则应使用预防性CSF。如果化疗被认为是中等风险(10%-20%的FN风险),则需要考虑患者的特定因素。5,6在癌症中,NCCN仅将小细胞癌的拓扑替康列为FN的高风险,因此,这是唯一一种需要明确使用预防性CSF的方案。5最新的ASCO指南没有列出FN高风险的化疗方案。6对于中等风险方案,NCCN指出,如果患者以前接受过化疗或放疗、持续性中性粒细胞减少、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing risk models guiding growth factor use in chemotherapy
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its corollary febrile neutropenia (FN) are well recognized, and they are serious consequences of many agents used in the treatment of malignancy. FN in particular has been associated with a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality, namely sepsis with multiorgan failure and eventual death.1 The mainstay of prophylaxis for patients who are deemed to be at high risk for CIN and FN is colony-stimulating factors (CSF). These agents have been shown to significantly decrease FN-related mortality, and therefore their use is potentially lifesaving.2 However, CSF are not cheap, with the cost of peg-filgrastim as much as US $6195.99 per cycle of chemotherapy.3 Therefore, not only do FN and CIN pose significant risk to patients, they also carry a high burden of cost to the patient and health care system both in treatment and prophylaxis.4 As such, it is prudent for oncologists to accurately identify high-risk patients and judiciously use CSF in an evidence-based manner. However, this has proven to be difficult because of the extent of variability between patients and the heterogeneity of the various risk models in the literature. Currently, there are 2 widely used guidelines, 1 developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and another by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Both guidelines suggest the use of prophylactic CSF if the chemotherapy regimen has an FN risk of more than 20% (high risk). If the chemotherapy is deemed to be of intermediate risk (10%-20% FN risk), then patient-specific factors need to be considered.5,6 In lung cancer, the NCCN lists only topotecan for small cell carcinomas as being high risk for FN, and therefore it is the only regimen that would warrant definitive use of prophylactic CSF.5 The most recent ASCO guidelines do not list chemotherapy regimens that are high risk for FN.6 For intermediate-risk regimens, the NCCN states that CSF prophylaxis should be considered if the patient has had previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, persistent neutropenia, bone marrow involvement by
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信