与商业策略、文献计量分析和文本挖掘相关的绩效研究趋势

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS
Iveta Musilová, Jiří Dvořák, Jaroslav Jánský, Vladimír Bolek
{"title":"与商业策略、文献计量分析和文本挖掘相关的绩效研究趋势","authors":"Iveta Musilová, Jiří Dvořák, Jaroslav Jánský, Vladimír Bolek","doi":"10.18267/j.cebr.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review aims to assess the evolution of performance monitoring articles in relation to the business strategy based on an overview of articles indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases. The initial dataset of articles was obtained based on carefully developed keywords. In the second phase, we restricted the selection to business and management journal articles and reviews written in English before 2019. The authors simultaneously reviewed the abstracts of all 571 articles in the third phase of the study. These were subsequently re-read and limited, thus the final data set for further analysis includes 157 articles published between 1983 and 2019. The most important result is that the field of business strategy and performance is not subject to trends. While in the field of business strategy the literature is still dominated by the generic strategies according to M. Porter and the strategy typology according to Miles and Snow, in the field of performance measurement we identified the Market Position (Sales Volume; growth in Sales Volume; etc.) and Profitability (Profit Margin, Return on Assets etc.) as a dominant method. Implications for Central European audience : Despite a considerable amount of work focusing on bibliographic analysis, there remains a lack of literature on the link between strategy and performance. The paper brings potential value for the Central European audience by drawing attention to the systematisation of knowledge in the field of performance articles and its trends in relation to the field of business strategy. The overview of the theoretical frameworks contributes to a better orientation of the current state of the art and creates opportunities for future research.","PeriodicalId":37276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Performance Research in Relation to Business Strategy, Bibliometric Analysis and Text Mining\",\"authors\":\"Iveta Musilová, Jiří Dvořák, Jaroslav Jánský, Vladimír Bolek\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/j.cebr.323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This literature review aims to assess the evolution of performance monitoring articles in relation to the business strategy based on an overview of articles indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases. The initial dataset of articles was obtained based on carefully developed keywords. In the second phase, we restricted the selection to business and management journal articles and reviews written in English before 2019. The authors simultaneously reviewed the abstracts of all 571 articles in the third phase of the study. These were subsequently re-read and limited, thus the final data set for further analysis includes 157 articles published between 1983 and 2019. The most important result is that the field of business strategy and performance is not subject to trends. While in the field of business strategy the literature is still dominated by the generic strategies according to M. Porter and the strategy typology according to Miles and Snow, in the field of performance measurement we identified the Market Position (Sales Volume; growth in Sales Volume; etc.) and Profitability (Profit Margin, Return on Assets etc.) as a dominant method. Implications for Central European audience : Despite a considerable amount of work focusing on bibliographic analysis, there remains a lack of literature on the link between strategy and performance. The paper brings potential value for the Central European audience by drawing attention to the systematisation of knowledge in the field of performance articles and its trends in relation to the field of business strategy. The overview of the theoretical frameworks contributes to a better orientation of the current state of the art and creates opportunities for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文献综述旨在基于WoS和Scopus数据库中索引文章的概述,评估与业务策略相关的性能监控文章的发展。文章的初始数据集是基于精心开发的关键词获得的。在第二阶段,我们将选择限制在2019年之前用英文撰写的商业和管理期刊文章和评论。作者同时审查了第三阶段研究中所有571篇文章的摘要。这些数据随后被重新阅读和限制,因此用于进一步分析的最终数据集包括1983年至2019年期间发表的157篇文章。最重要的结果是,业务战略和绩效领域不受趋势的影响。虽然在商业战略领域,文献仍然由波特的通用战略和迈尔斯和斯诺的战略类型学所主导,但在绩效衡量领域,我们确定了市场地位(销售量;销售额增长;等)和盈利能力(利润率,资产回报率等)作为主导方法。对中欧受众的影响:尽管有相当多的工作集中在书目分析上,但仍然缺乏关于战略与绩效之间联系的文献。本文通过引起对性能文章领域的知识系统化及其与商业战略领域相关的趋势的关注,为中欧观众带来了潜在的价值。对理论框架的概述有助于更好地定位当前的艺术状态,并为未来的研究创造机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Performance Research in Relation to Business Strategy, Bibliometric Analysis and Text Mining
This literature review aims to assess the evolution of performance monitoring articles in relation to the business strategy based on an overview of articles indexed in the WoS and Scopus databases. The initial dataset of articles was obtained based on carefully developed keywords. In the second phase, we restricted the selection to business and management journal articles and reviews written in English before 2019. The authors simultaneously reviewed the abstracts of all 571 articles in the third phase of the study. These were subsequently re-read and limited, thus the final data set for further analysis includes 157 articles published between 1983 and 2019. The most important result is that the field of business strategy and performance is not subject to trends. While in the field of business strategy the literature is still dominated by the generic strategies according to M. Porter and the strategy typology according to Miles and Snow, in the field of performance measurement we identified the Market Position (Sales Volume; growth in Sales Volume; etc.) and Profitability (Profit Margin, Return on Assets etc.) as a dominant method. Implications for Central European audience : Despite a considerable amount of work focusing on bibliographic analysis, there remains a lack of literature on the link between strategy and performance. The paper brings potential value for the Central European audience by drawing attention to the systematisation of knowledge in the field of performance articles and its trends in relation to the field of business strategy. The overview of the theoretical frameworks contributes to a better orientation of the current state of the art and creates opportunities for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Business Review
Central European Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信