能源消耗最小化和能源效率最大化是一回事吗?

Q3 Energy
B. Kilkis
{"title":"能源消耗最小化和能源效率最大化是一回事吗?","authors":"B. Kilkis","doi":"10.30521/jes.938504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper discusses whether the exergy destruction minimization or energy efficiency maximization comes first in resolving the climate emergency problem and provides sustainable solution options regarding the 2 nd Law of thermodynamics. It has been shown that low-temperature district energy systems with renewable energy sources and waste heat are effective in minimizing exergy destructions, while energy efficiency has a secondary impact. The research has been based on the Rational Exergy Management Model. The corresponding rational exergy management efficiency was directly related to nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions responsibility with a global magnitude of around 80% of direct emissions in the built environment. One conclusion deduced from such an unrecognized magnitude so far is that nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions may not be ignored anymore to develop new strategies for sustainable decarbonization, while the 1 st Law measures have limited remaining capabilities. New equations were developed to show the impact of exergy destructions on total CO 2 emissions. Sample results show that a 30 percent-point decrease of exergy destructions comparing to the supplied exergy in thermo-mechanical systems has the potential of reducing total CO 2 emissions by 35%. The paper argues that current exergy destruction is around 0.8 of the supply exergy, as an industry average, which gives ample room for improvement using the 2 nd Law, while the 1 st Law efficiency is already higher, and there is less room available for improvements concerning CO 2 emissions. The paper shows that the 1 st Law efficiency may be increased by about 0.15 points, which gives a window of opportunity about a 25 percent-point decrease in emissions. The second main conclusion is that nowadays, new decarbonization strategies are needed based on the 2 nd Law, which will positively impact when coupled with the current 1 st Law measures towards meeting the Paris agreement. These results show that even in a simple solar flat plate collector, the number and type of useful applications arranged in tandem, like further use of the remaining heat in preheating the municipal water supply instead of wasting the heat, is important about exergy-based high rationality. In a holistic view,  CO 2 may be related to exergy rationality, ψ R . From Equations 6-a and 6-b, and ψ R ~ε dem /ε des , for all cases, Equation 8 is derived.","PeriodicalId":52308,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is exergy destruction minimization the same thing as energy efficiency maximization?\",\"authors\":\"B. Kilkis\",\"doi\":\"10.30521/jes.938504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper discusses whether the exergy destruction minimization or energy efficiency maximization comes first in resolving the climate emergency problem and provides sustainable solution options regarding the 2 nd Law of thermodynamics. It has been shown that low-temperature district energy systems with renewable energy sources and waste heat are effective in minimizing exergy destructions, while energy efficiency has a secondary impact. The research has been based on the Rational Exergy Management Model. The corresponding rational exergy management efficiency was directly related to nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions responsibility with a global magnitude of around 80% of direct emissions in the built environment. One conclusion deduced from such an unrecognized magnitude so far is that nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions may not be ignored anymore to develop new strategies for sustainable decarbonization, while the 1 st Law measures have limited remaining capabilities. New equations were developed to show the impact of exergy destructions on total CO 2 emissions. Sample results show that a 30 percent-point decrease of exergy destructions comparing to the supplied exergy in thermo-mechanical systems has the potential of reducing total CO 2 emissions by 35%. The paper argues that current exergy destruction is around 0.8 of the supply exergy, as an industry average, which gives ample room for improvement using the 2 nd Law, while the 1 st Law efficiency is already higher, and there is less room available for improvements concerning CO 2 emissions. The paper shows that the 1 st Law efficiency may be increased by about 0.15 points, which gives a window of opportunity about a 25 percent-point decrease in emissions. The second main conclusion is that nowadays, new decarbonization strategies are needed based on the 2 nd Law, which will positively impact when coupled with the current 1 st Law measures towards meeting the Paris agreement. These results show that even in a simple solar flat plate collector, the number and type of useful applications arranged in tandem, like further use of the remaining heat in preheating the municipal water supply instead of wasting the heat, is important about exergy-based high rationality. In a holistic view,  CO 2 may be related to exergy rationality, ψ R . From Equations 6-a and 6-b, and ψ R ~ε dem /ε des , for all cases, Equation 8 is derived.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.938504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.938504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文讨论了在解决气候紧急问题时,火用破坏最小化还是能效最大化是第一位的,并根据热力学第二定律提供了可持续的解决方案。研究表明,具有可再生能源和废热的低温区域能源系统在最大限度地减少火用破坏方面是有效的,而能源效率具有次要影响。本研究是基于合理的火用管理模型进行的。相应的合理火用管理效率与几乎可以避免的二氧化碳排放责任直接相关,其全球范围约为建筑环境中直接排放的80%。从迄今为止未被承认的规模推断出的一个结论是,在制定可持续脱碳的新战略时,几乎可以避免的二氧化碳排放可能不再被忽视,而第1条法律措施的剩余能力有限。建立了新的方程来显示火用破坏对CO2总排放的影响。样品结果表明,在热力机械系统中,与提供的火用相比,火用破坏减少30%有可能将CO2总排放量减少35%。本文认为,目前的火用破坏约为供应火用的0.8,作为行业平均值,这为使用第二定律提供了充足的改进空间,而第一定律的效率已经更高,在CO2排放方面的改进空间更小。论文表明,第一定律的效率可以提高约0.15个百分点,这为排放量减少约25%提供了机会之窗。第二个主要结论是,如今,需要根据第2条法律制定新的脱碳战略,这将与当前的第1条法律措施相结合,对实现《巴黎协定》产生积极影响。这些结果表明,即使在一个简单的太阳能平板收集器中,串联布置的有用应用的数量和类型,如在预热城市供水时进一步利用余热而不是浪费热量,对于基于火用的高度合理性是重要的。从整体来看, CO2可能与火用合理性ψR有关。根据方程6-a和6-b,以及ψR~εdem/εdes,在所有情况下,导出了方程8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is exergy destruction minimization the same thing as energy efficiency maximization?
: This paper discusses whether the exergy destruction minimization or energy efficiency maximization comes first in resolving the climate emergency problem and provides sustainable solution options regarding the 2 nd Law of thermodynamics. It has been shown that low-temperature district energy systems with renewable energy sources and waste heat are effective in minimizing exergy destructions, while energy efficiency has a secondary impact. The research has been based on the Rational Exergy Management Model. The corresponding rational exergy management efficiency was directly related to nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions responsibility with a global magnitude of around 80% of direct emissions in the built environment. One conclusion deduced from such an unrecognized magnitude so far is that nearly-avoidable CO 2 emissions may not be ignored anymore to develop new strategies for sustainable decarbonization, while the 1 st Law measures have limited remaining capabilities. New equations were developed to show the impact of exergy destructions on total CO 2 emissions. Sample results show that a 30 percent-point decrease of exergy destructions comparing to the supplied exergy in thermo-mechanical systems has the potential of reducing total CO 2 emissions by 35%. The paper argues that current exergy destruction is around 0.8 of the supply exergy, as an industry average, which gives ample room for improvement using the 2 nd Law, while the 1 st Law efficiency is already higher, and there is less room available for improvements concerning CO 2 emissions. The paper shows that the 1 st Law efficiency may be increased by about 0.15 points, which gives a window of opportunity about a 25 percent-point decrease in emissions. The second main conclusion is that nowadays, new decarbonization strategies are needed based on the 2 nd Law, which will positively impact when coupled with the current 1 st Law measures towards meeting the Paris agreement. These results show that even in a simple solar flat plate collector, the number and type of useful applications arranged in tandem, like further use of the remaining heat in preheating the municipal water supply instead of wasting the heat, is important about exergy-based high rationality. In a holistic view,  CO 2 may be related to exergy rationality, ψ R . From Equations 6-a and 6-b, and ψ R ~ε dem /ε des , for all cases, Equation 8 is derived.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Energy Systems
Journal of Energy Systems Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信