在南印度第一波疫情期间,一家大型急诊室的新冠肺炎疑似病例和绿区出现新冠肺炎阳性

S. Selvan, V. Krishnaraj, Ponnivalavan Mathiyalagan, Hepzibah Nesamani, Paul W. Kumar, Anna Paul, Karthik Gunasekaran, K. P. Prabhakar Abhilash
{"title":"在南印度第一波疫情期间,一家大型急诊室的新冠肺炎疑似病例和绿区出现新冠肺炎阳性","authors":"S. Selvan, V. Krishnaraj, Ponnivalavan Mathiyalagan, Hepzibah Nesamani, Paul W. Kumar, Anna Paul, Karthik Gunasekaran, K. P. Prabhakar Abhilash","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_134_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a necessary division of the emergency department (ED) into the COVID suspect zone and a green zone based on a modified “The” Christian Medical college (CMCTS). Triaging was initially done based on the epidemiological criteria and evolved into symptom-based assessment when community transmission began. Methodology: This retrospective study included all patients who were triaged in the ED from April 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected from the ED triage software and were analyzed to determine the performance of the modified triage criteria in admitting patients to the ED. Results: Forty-three thousand patients were triaged during the study. Of which 35.9% (n = 15429) were sent to the COVID suspect zone and 64.1% (n = 27571) to the green zone. Of the 8490 (55%) nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests done in the COVID suspect zone, 61.4% were positive for COVID-19 while only 9.2% (n = 274) of 2866 tested in the green zone were positive. COVID-19 positivity was the highest in the mid-pandemic months of July, August, and September 2020. In the COVID suspect zone, factors for predicting a negative RT-PCR result were priority 1 presentation and early and late pandemic presentations. The positive predictive value of our modified triage criteria during the pandemic was 85% with a higher accuracy during the peak of the first wave (July–September 2020). Conclusion: The modified CMCTS successfully segregated COVID-19-positive patients from the COVID-19 negative patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 in 2020. The CMCTS criteria can be easily adopted or adapted in other hospitals in India in case of future waves of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India\",\"authors\":\"S. Selvan, V. Krishnaraj, Ponnivalavan Mathiyalagan, Hepzibah Nesamani, Paul W. Kumar, Anna Paul, Karthik Gunasekaran, K. P. Prabhakar Abhilash\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_134_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a necessary division of the emergency department (ED) into the COVID suspect zone and a green zone based on a modified “The” Christian Medical college (CMCTS). Triaging was initially done based on the epidemiological criteria and evolved into symptom-based assessment when community transmission began. Methodology: This retrospective study included all patients who were triaged in the ED from April 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected from the ED triage software and were analyzed to determine the performance of the modified triage criteria in admitting patients to the ED. Results: Forty-three thousand patients were triaged during the study. Of which 35.9% (n = 15429) were sent to the COVID suspect zone and 64.1% (n = 27571) to the green zone. Of the 8490 (55%) nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests done in the COVID suspect zone, 61.4% were positive for COVID-19 while only 9.2% (n = 274) of 2866 tested in the green zone were positive. COVID-19 positivity was the highest in the mid-pandemic months of July, August, and September 2020. In the COVID suspect zone, factors for predicting a negative RT-PCR result were priority 1 presentation and early and late pandemic presentations. The positive predictive value of our modified triage criteria during the pandemic was 85% with a higher accuracy during the peak of the first wave (July–September 2020). Conclusion: The modified CMCTS successfully segregated COVID-19-positive patients from the COVID-19 negative patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 in 2020. The CMCTS criteria can be easily adopted or adapted in other hospitals in India in case of future waves of COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_134_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_134_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在新冠肺炎大流行期间,急诊科(ED)有必要划分为COVID可疑区域和基于修改后的“基督教医学院”(CMCTS)的绿色区域。最初根据流行病学标准进行分类,并在社区传播开始时演变为基于症状的评估。方法:这项回顾性研究包括2020年4月至2020年12月在急诊科分诊的所有患者。从ED分诊软件中收集数据,并对其进行分析,以确定修改后的分诊标准在ED患者入院时的表现。结果:研究期间对四万三千名患者进行了分诊。其中35.9%(n=15429)被送往新冠肺炎可疑区域,64.1%(n=27571)被送往绿色区域。在新冠肺炎可疑区进行的8490次(55%)鼻咽拭子逆转录聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)检测中,61.4%的新冠肺炎呈阳性,而在绿区进行的2866次检测中,只有9.2%(n=274)呈阳性。新冠肺炎阳性率在2020年7月、8月和9月的疫情中期最高。在新冠肺炎疑似区,预测RT-PCR阴性结果的因素是优先1表现以及早期和晚期大流行表现。我们修改的分诊标准在疫情期间的阳性预测值为85%,在第一波疫情高峰期(2020年7月至9月)的准确率更高。结论:在2020年新冠肺炎第一波疫情期间,改良的CMCTS成功地将新冠肺炎阳性患者与新冠肺炎阴性患者分离。如果未来出现新冠肺炎疫情,印度其他医院可以很容易地采用或调整CMCTS标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a necessary division of the emergency department (ED) into the COVID suspect zone and a green zone based on a modified “The” Christian Medical college (CMCTS). Triaging was initially done based on the epidemiological criteria and evolved into symptom-based assessment when community transmission began. Methodology: This retrospective study included all patients who were triaged in the ED from April 2020 to December 2020. Data were collected from the ED triage software and were analyzed to determine the performance of the modified triage criteria in admitting patients to the ED. Results: Forty-three thousand patients were triaged during the study. Of which 35.9% (n = 15429) were sent to the COVID suspect zone and 64.1% (n = 27571) to the green zone. Of the 8490 (55%) nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests done in the COVID suspect zone, 61.4% were positive for COVID-19 while only 9.2% (n = 274) of 2866 tested in the green zone were positive. COVID-19 positivity was the highest in the mid-pandemic months of July, August, and September 2020. In the COVID suspect zone, factors for predicting a negative RT-PCR result were priority 1 presentation and early and late pandemic presentations. The positive predictive value of our modified triage criteria during the pandemic was 85% with a higher accuracy during the peak of the first wave (July–September 2020). Conclusion: The modified CMCTS successfully segregated COVID-19-positive patients from the COVID-19 negative patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 in 2020. The CMCTS criteria can be easily adopted or adapted in other hospitals in India in case of future waves of COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信