YouTube视频是否为患者提供了足够可靠的关于白斑病变的信息？视频内容与质量分析

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15398285.2022.2115704

T. Ozturk, Eldar Sheydayev, A. Yağcı

{"title":"YouTube视频是否为患者提供了足够可靠的关于白斑病变的信息？视频内容与质量分析","authors":"T. Ozturk, Eldar Sheydayev, A. Yağcı","doi":"10.1080/15398285.2022.2115704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the quality and reliability of videos about white spot lesions (WSLs) uploaded to YouTube. The keyword required for searching was analyzed using the Google Trends online application, which determined a “white spot lesion.” The first 140 videos about WSLs were watched and 85 of them were evaluated. The videos watched were divided into two categories according to their reliability score (RS): low reliability and medium/high reliability. The videos also examined the global quality index (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI) data for the videos. Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and multivariate analysis of variance were used to evaluate the data. It was determined that there were more videos about WSLs with medium/high reliability (65.9%) than with low reliability and that most of the videos were uploaded by clinics (49.4%). The videos contained more information about WSLs in terms of definition (70.6%), treatment indication (77.6%), treatment advantage (77.6%), and treatment procedure (76.5%). It was also determined that the mean GQS, VIQI, and RS values differed according to video reliability category, and only the mean interaction index values differed significantly according to video source (p < .05). Most YouTube videos about WSLs examined in this study were of medium/high reliability. Thus, it can be concluded that the videos about WSLs on YouTube are generally reliable.","PeriodicalId":44184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do YouTube Videos Provide Enough Reliable Information to Patients about White Spot Lesions? A Video Content and Quality Analysis\",\"authors\":\"T. Ozturk, Eldar Sheydayev, A. Yağcı\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15398285.2022.2115704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examines the quality and reliability of videos about white spot lesions (WSLs) uploaded to YouTube. The keyword required for searching was analyzed using the Google Trends online application, which determined a “white spot lesion.” The first 140 videos about WSLs were watched and 85 of them were evaluated. The videos watched were divided into two categories according to their reliability score (RS): low reliability and medium/high reliability. The videos also examined the global quality index (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI) data for the videos. Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and multivariate analysis of variance were used to evaluate the data. It was determined that there were more videos about WSLs with medium/high reliability (65.9%) than with low reliability and that most of the videos were uploaded by clinics (49.4%). The videos contained more information about WSLs in terms of definition (70.6%), treatment indication (77.6%), treatment advantage (77.6%), and treatment procedure (76.5%). It was also determined that the mean GQS, VIQI, and RS values differed according to video reliability category, and only the mean interaction index values differed significantly according to video source (p < .05). Most YouTube videos about WSLs examined in this study were of medium/high reliability. Thus, it can be concluded that the videos about WSLs on YouTube are generally reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2022.2115704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2022.2115704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究对上传至YouTube的白斑病变(WSLs)视频的质量和可靠性进行了检验。使用谷歌Trends在线应用程序对搜索所需的关键字进行分析，确定了“白斑病变”。观看了前140个关于wsl的视频，并对其中的85个进行了评估。观看的视频根据可靠性评分(RS)分为两类:低可靠性和中/高可靠性。视频还检查了视频的全球质量指数(GQS)和视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)数据。采用Pearson卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和多变量方差分析对数据进行评价。结果表明，中高信度视频(65.9%)多于低信度视频(49.4%)，且大部分视频由诊所上传。视频在定义(70.6%)、治疗指征(77.6%)、治疗优势(77.6%)和治疗程序(76.5%)方面包含了更多关于wsl的信息。GQS、VIQI和RS的平均值因视频可靠性类别而异，只有交互指数值的平均值因视频来源而异(p < 0.05)。在本研究中，大多数关于web语言的YouTube视频具有中/高可靠性。因此，可以得出结论，YouTube上关于wsdl的视频总体上是可靠的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do YouTube Videos Provide Enough Reliable Information to Patients about White Spot Lesions? A Video Content and Quality Analysis

Abstract This study examines the quality and reliability of videos about white spot lesions (WSLs) uploaded to YouTube. The keyword required for searching was analyzed using the Google Trends online application, which determined a “white spot lesion.” The first 140 videos about WSLs were watched and 85 of them were evaluated. The videos watched were divided into two categories according to their reliability score (RS): low reliability and medium/high reliability. The videos also examined the global quality index (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI) data for the videos. Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and multivariate analysis of variance were used to evaluate the data. It was determined that there were more videos about WSLs with medium/high reliability (65.9%) than with low reliability and that most of the videos were uploaded by clinics (49.4%). The videos contained more information about WSLs in terms of definition (70.6%), treatment indication (77.6%), treatment advantage (77.6%), and treatment procedure (76.5%). It was also determined that the mean GQS, VIQI, and RS values differed according to video reliability category, and only the mean interaction index values differed significantly according to video source (p < .05). Most YouTube videos about WSLs examined in this study were of medium/high reliability. Thus, it can be concluded that the videos about WSLs on YouTube are generally reliable.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet is the only professional peer-reviewed journal devoted to locating consumer health information via the Internet. In this journal librarians and health information providers describe programs and services aimed at helping patients and the general public find the health information they need. From the Editor: "Studies have shown that health information is one of the major reasons that people worldwide access the Internet. As the amount of health information on the Web increases exponentially, it becomes critical that librarians-including public and medical librarians-be knowledgeable about what is available online and be able to direct users to reliable, accurate, quality information."