测量特质议论文量的行为指标的议论文量指数的初步报告

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Charles J. Wigley, Andrew S. Rancer, Yangjing Lin
{"title":"测量特质议论文量的行为指标的议论文量指数的初步报告","authors":"Charles J. Wigley, Andrew S. Rancer, Yangjing Lin","doi":"10.1080/01463373.2023.2228864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Infante and Rancer’s (1982) Argumentativeness Scale has withstood the test of time, but questions remain among some scholars as to specific scale items and how those items might affect structural and predictive validity. Infante and his colleagues have always called upon others constructively to improve on the measurement of trait argumentativeness. This investigation answers that call by developing a new measure, the Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators, that dramatically differs in structure and method of measurement from the Argumentativeness Scale. This new scale uses an alternative to Likert items. Items were designed to reflect a tendency toward specific behaviors rather than attitudes. Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators is a scalar alternative to the Argumentativeness Scale, but not necessarily a replacement. The goal of the present investigation was not to change the Argumentativeness Scale as an operational definition of argumentativeness but, rather, to provide an alternative operational definition of trait argumentativeness.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial report of the Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators for measuring trait argumentativeness\",\"authors\":\"Charles J. Wigley, Andrew S. Rancer, Yangjing Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01463373.2023.2228864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Infante and Rancer’s (1982) Argumentativeness Scale has withstood the test of time, but questions remain among some scholars as to specific scale items and how those items might affect structural and predictive validity. Infante and his colleagues have always called upon others constructively to improve on the measurement of trait argumentativeness. This investigation answers that call by developing a new measure, the Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators, that dramatically differs in structure and method of measurement from the Argumentativeness Scale. This new scale uses an alternative to Likert items. Items were designed to reflect a tendency toward specific behaviors rather than attitudes. Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators is a scalar alternative to the Argumentativeness Scale, but not necessarily a replacement. The goal of the present investigation was not to change the Argumentativeness Scale as an operational definition of argumentativeness but, rather, to provide an alternative operational definition of trait argumentativeness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2228864\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2228864","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Infante和Rancer(1982)的议论文量表经受住了时间的考验,但一些学者对具体的量表项目以及这些项目如何影响结构和预测有效性仍存在疑问。因凡特和他的同事们一直在建设性地呼吁其他人改进特质辩论性的测量。这项调查通过开发一种新的测量方法——行为指标的争论指数来回应这一呼吁,该测量方法在结构和测量方法上与争论量表有很大不同。这种新的量表使用了Likert项目的替代品。项目的设计是为了反映特定行为的倾向,而不是态度。行为指标的争论指数是争论量表的标量替代品,但不一定是替代品。本研究的目的不是改变争论量表作为争论性的操作定义,而是提供一种特质争论性的替代操作定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial report of the Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators for measuring trait argumentativeness
ABSTRACT Infante and Rancer’s (1982) Argumentativeness Scale has withstood the test of time, but questions remain among some scholars as to specific scale items and how those items might affect structural and predictive validity. Infante and his colleagues have always called upon others constructively to improve on the measurement of trait argumentativeness. This investigation answers that call by developing a new measure, the Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators, that dramatically differs in structure and method of measurement from the Argumentativeness Scale. This new scale uses an alternative to Likert items. Items were designed to reflect a tendency toward specific behaviors rather than attitudes. Argumentativeness Index of Behavioral Indicators is a scalar alternative to the Argumentativeness Scale, but not necessarily a replacement. The goal of the present investigation was not to change the Argumentativeness Scale as an operational definition of argumentativeness but, rather, to provide an alternative operational definition of trait argumentativeness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信