非二元youtuber中的语言意识形态和合法性

IF 1.6 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Archie Crowley
{"title":"非二元youtuber中的语言意识形态和合法性","authors":"Archie Crowley","doi":"10.1075/jls.20021.cro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores how ten nonbinary North American YouTubers appeal to legitimizing discourses\n (van Leeuwen & Wodak 1999) as rationalizations for their choices regarding\n identity labels and pronouns. Given the local cultural salience of the implications of their language choices, the YouTubers\n rationalize their terminological choices through legitimizing discourses that prioritize historical facts, lexical\n definitions, and personal feelings. I examine how these discourses presuppose particular\n language ideologies, or implicit assumptions about what language users view as “appropriate” language practices. In the\n case of the nonbinary YouTubers, I illustrate that the vloggers’ legitimizing discourses appeal to and juxtapose a referentialist\n ideology (Hill 2008, Silverstein 1979),\n according to which words should describe the world truthfully, and an ideology of self-identification (Zimman 2019), which prioritizes individual agency. Crucially, deploying these legitimizing discourses is\n an important strategy that nonbinary YouTubers draw on as part of their advocacy and education projects.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language ideologies and legitimacy among nonbinary YouTubers\",\"authors\":\"Archie Crowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.20021.cro\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores how ten nonbinary North American YouTubers appeal to legitimizing discourses\\n (van Leeuwen & Wodak 1999) as rationalizations for their choices regarding\\n identity labels and pronouns. Given the local cultural salience of the implications of their language choices, the YouTubers\\n rationalize their terminological choices through legitimizing discourses that prioritize historical facts, lexical\\n definitions, and personal feelings. I examine how these discourses presuppose particular\\n language ideologies, or implicit assumptions about what language users view as “appropriate” language practices. In the\\n case of the nonbinary YouTubers, I illustrate that the vloggers’ legitimizing discourses appeal to and juxtapose a referentialist\\n ideology (Hill 2008, Silverstein 1979),\\n according to which words should describe the world truthfully, and an ideology of self-identification (Zimman 2019), which prioritizes individual agency. Crucially, deploying these legitimizing discourses is\\n an important strategy that nonbinary YouTubers draw on as part of their advocacy and education projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20021.cro\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20021.cro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了十个非二元的北美youtuber如何诉诸合法化话语(van Leeuwen & Wodak 1999)作为他们对身份标签和代词选择的合理化。考虑到当地文化对语言选择的影响,youtuber通过优先考虑历史事实,词汇定义和个人感受的合法化话语来合理化他们的术语选择。我研究了这些话语如何预设特定的语言意识形态,或者对语言使用者认为“适当”的语言实践的隐含假设。就非二元的youtube博主而言,我说明了视频博主的合法化话语吸引并并列了一种参照主义意识形态(Hill 2008, Silverstein 1979),根据这种意识形态,词语应该真实地描述世界,以及一种自我认同的意识形态(Zimman 2019),它优先考虑个人代理。至关重要的是,非二元性youtube用户在宣传和教育项目中采用了一种重要策略,利用这些合法化的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language ideologies and legitimacy among nonbinary YouTubers
This paper explores how ten nonbinary North American YouTubers appeal to legitimizing discourses (van Leeuwen & Wodak 1999) as rationalizations for their choices regarding identity labels and pronouns. Given the local cultural salience of the implications of their language choices, the YouTubers rationalize their terminological choices through legitimizing discourses that prioritize historical facts, lexical definitions, and personal feelings. I examine how these discourses presuppose particular language ideologies, or implicit assumptions about what language users view as “appropriate” language practices. In the case of the nonbinary YouTubers, I illustrate that the vloggers’ legitimizing discourses appeal to and juxtapose a referentialist ideology (Hill 2008, Silverstein 1979), according to which words should describe the world truthfully, and an ideology of self-identification (Zimman 2019), which prioritizes individual agency. Crucially, deploying these legitimizing discourses is an important strategy that nonbinary YouTubers draw on as part of their advocacy and education projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Journal of Language and Sexuality Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信