柏拉图《蒂迈奥》中容器段落中的“这个”和“那样”

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1515/agph-2021-2016

Takeshi Nakamura

{"title":"柏拉图《蒂迈奥》中容器段落中的“这个”和“那样”","authors":"Takeshi Nakamura","doi":"10.1515/agph-2021-2016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One short passage on what is called the Receptacle in Plato’s Timaeus (49c–50a) has been the subject of much controversy since Cherniss presented an alternative reading of it in 1954. In this paper, I criticize an influential argument presented by Zeyl for a traditional reading, and propose a new interpretation which adopts the alternative reading on important sentences of the passage, but is not accompanied by the defects of Cherniss’ interpretation.","PeriodicalId":44741,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE","volume":"104 1","pages":"239 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/agph-2021-2016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“This” and “Such” in the Receptacle Passage of Plato’s Timaeus\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/agph-2021-2016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract One short passage on what is called the Receptacle in Plato’s Timaeus (49c–50a) has been the subject of much controversy since Cherniss presented an alternative reading of it in 1954. In this paper, I criticize an influential argument presented by Zeyl for a traditional reading, and propose a new interpretation which adopts the alternative reading on important sentences of the passage, but is not accompanied by the defects of Cherniss’ interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/agph-2021-2016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-2016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-2016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

自1954年切尼斯(Cherniss)提出另一种解读以来，柏拉图的《蒂玛乌斯》(Timaeus, 49c-50a)中有一段关于容器的短文一直是争议的主题。在本文中，我批判了Zeyl对传统解读的一个有影响力的论点，并提出了一种新的解读，这种解读对文章的重要句子采用了替代解读，但没有伴随Cherniss解读的缺陷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“This” and “Such” in the Receptacle Passage of Plato’s Timaeus

Abstract One short passage on what is called the Receptacle in Plato’s Timaeus (49c–50a) has been the subject of much controversy since Cherniss presented an alternative reading of it in 1954. In this paper, I criticize an influential argument presented by Zeyl for a traditional reading, and propose a new interpretation which adopts the alternative reading on important sentences of the passage, but is not accompanied by the defects of Cherniss’ interpretation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ARCHIV FUR GESCHICHTE DER PHILOSOPHIE PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie [Archive for the History of Philosophy] is one of the world"s leading academic journals specializing in the history of philosophy. The Archiv publishes exceptional scholarship in all areas of western philosophy from antiquity through the twentieth century. The journal insists on the highest scholarly standards and values precise argumentation and lucid prose. Articles should reflect the current state of the best international research while advancing the field"s understanding of a historical author, school, problem, or concept. The journal has a broad international readership and a rich history.