也许生命的任何地方都没有痕迹:想象中的自体学和古生物学死亡想象

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
F. Vozel
{"title":"也许生命的任何地方都没有痕迹:想象中的自体学和古生物学死亡想象","authors":"F. Vozel","doi":"10.3366/jobs.2022.0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay interprets Imagination Dead Imagine as the product of Beckett’s own autology, in Arnold Geulincx’s sense of the term. The Cartesian occasionalist advanced that self-inspection culminates with the revelation of human beings’ fundamental ignorance and impotence. I suggest that the short text borrows Geulingian themes and imagery to offer a dazzling vision – from the point of view of eternity – of the radical atomization and opacity of the human condition. Furthermore, I explore how Beckett generates a specifically Geulingian commentary on a debate that obsessed him throughout his life: the problem of the subject-object relation and the self-to-self relation in artistic representation. Finally, I propose to read the paradoxical imperative ‘imagination dead imagine’ as a Geulingian axiom in its own right, that is, as an inescapable obligation whose fulfilment is quasi-impossible.","PeriodicalId":41421,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Trace Anywhere of Life, Perhaps: Autology and Hauntology in Imagination Dead Imagine\",\"authors\":\"F. Vozel\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/jobs.2022.0372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay interprets Imagination Dead Imagine as the product of Beckett’s own autology, in Arnold Geulincx’s sense of the term. The Cartesian occasionalist advanced that self-inspection culminates with the revelation of human beings’ fundamental ignorance and impotence. I suggest that the short text borrows Geulingian themes and imagery to offer a dazzling vision – from the point of view of eternity – of the radical atomization and opacity of the human condition. Furthermore, I explore how Beckett generates a specifically Geulingian commentary on a debate that obsessed him throughout his life: the problem of the subject-object relation and the self-to-self relation in artistic representation. Finally, I propose to read the paradoxical imperative ‘imagination dead imagine’ as a Geulingian axiom in its own right, that is, as an inescapable obligation whose fulfilment is quasi-impossible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/jobs.2022.0372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jobs.2022.0372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将《想象》与《想象》解读为贝克特自述的产物,即阿诺德·格林克斯对自述的理解。笛卡儿偶然性论者提出,自我反省的高潮是揭示人类根本的无知和无能。我认为这篇短文借用了葛林的主题和意象,从永恒的角度提供了一种令人眼花缭乱的愿景,即人类状况的彻底原子化和不透明。此外,我还探讨了贝克特是如何对一个困扰他一生的争论——艺术表现中的主客体关系和自我对自我关系——产生一种特殊的葛林式评论的。最后,我建议将矛盾的命令“想象死亡想象”作为其本身权利的葛林公理来解读,也就是说,作为一种不可逃避的义务,其实现几乎是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Trace Anywhere of Life, Perhaps: Autology and Hauntology in Imagination Dead Imagine
This essay interprets Imagination Dead Imagine as the product of Beckett’s own autology, in Arnold Geulincx’s sense of the term. The Cartesian occasionalist advanced that self-inspection culminates with the revelation of human beings’ fundamental ignorance and impotence. I suggest that the short text borrows Geulingian themes and imagery to offer a dazzling vision – from the point of view of eternity – of the radical atomization and opacity of the human condition. Furthermore, I explore how Beckett generates a specifically Geulingian commentary on a debate that obsessed him throughout his life: the problem of the subject-object relation and the self-to-self relation in artistic representation. Finally, I propose to read the paradoxical imperative ‘imagination dead imagine’ as a Geulingian axiom in its own right, that is, as an inescapable obligation whose fulfilment is quasi-impossible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信