{"title":"性少数群体心理治疗的积极适应:系统回顾","authors":"A. Bazán, M. Mansilla","doi":"10.5093/cc2022a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Since the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder and the prolifera-tion of research about stigma and its outcomes in mental health, a significant number of pa-pers have been published to study how sexual minorities respond to psychological treatment and whether adapted treatment or affirmative interventions are necessary, as is done with other minority groups. The objective of this review of the available literature is to determi-ne if sexual minorities have the same response to standard treatments as their heterosexual counterparts, and whether adapted or affirmative interventions offer them better outcomes than standard treatment. Certain studies have identified differential outcomes in elective treatments, like cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression, when performed in ambulatory contexts, es-pecially in the bisexual population and in female sexual minorities, who appear to benefit least from standard treatment. In the hospital context, outcomes did not differ between heterosexual and sexual minorities It has been concluded that adaptations may be necessary due to the poor response to standard treatment, though further research is required, mainly regarding the common factors of the treatment that predict good outcomes in all populations.","PeriodicalId":41015,"journal":{"name":"Revista Clinica Contemporanea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La adaptación afirmativa de los tratamientos psicológicos para minorías sexuales: una revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"A. Bazán, M. Mansilla\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/cc2022a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Since the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder and the prolifera-tion of research about stigma and its outcomes in mental health, a significant number of pa-pers have been published to study how sexual minorities respond to psychological treatment and whether adapted treatment or affirmative interventions are necessary, as is done with other minority groups. The objective of this review of the available literature is to determi-ne if sexual minorities have the same response to standard treatments as their heterosexual counterparts, and whether adapted or affirmative interventions offer them better outcomes than standard treatment. Certain studies have identified differential outcomes in elective treatments, like cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression, when performed in ambulatory contexts, es-pecially in the bisexual population and in female sexual minorities, who appear to benefit least from standard treatment. In the hospital context, outcomes did not differ between heterosexual and sexual minorities It has been concluded that adaptations may be necessary due to the poor response to standard treatment, though further research is required, mainly regarding the common factors of the treatment that predict good outcomes in all populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Clinica Contemporanea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Clinica Contemporanea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/cc2022a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Clinica Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/cc2022a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
La adaptación afirmativa de los tratamientos psicológicos para minorías sexuales: una revisión sistemática
: Since the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder and the prolifera-tion of research about stigma and its outcomes in mental health, a significant number of pa-pers have been published to study how sexual minorities respond to psychological treatment and whether adapted treatment or affirmative interventions are necessary, as is done with other minority groups. The objective of this review of the available literature is to determi-ne if sexual minorities have the same response to standard treatments as their heterosexual counterparts, and whether adapted or affirmative interventions offer them better outcomes than standard treatment. Certain studies have identified differential outcomes in elective treatments, like cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression, when performed in ambulatory contexts, es-pecially in the bisexual population and in female sexual minorities, who appear to benefit least from standard treatment. In the hospital context, outcomes did not differ between heterosexual and sexual minorities It has been concluded that adaptations may be necessary due to the poor response to standard treatment, though further research is required, mainly regarding the common factors of the treatment that predict good outcomes in all populations.