对话绘画:研究幼儿抽象现象的一种方法

Q3 Social Sciences
Amelia Ruscoe
{"title":"对话绘画:研究幼儿抽象现象的一种方法","authors":"Amelia Ruscoe","doi":"10.1163/23644583-bja10036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article explores the theoretical, ethical, and practical opportunities and constraints considered in the methodological design and use of Dialogic Drawing, a participatory method for accessing qualitative data with young children. The method was designed to gather data about abstract phenomena from young children, as part of a larger study investigating the impact of discursive affordances in the first year of compulsory school in Western Australia. Methodological findings are reported from the application of Dialogic Drawing with 28 five-year-old children from diverse school-based semiotic landscapes in the Perth metropolitan area in Western Australia. Three strands of analysis are described and critiqued: drawn product, drawing process, and approach to drawing. Thematic analysis of drawn visual schema, dialog and embodied behaviours highlights the potential reach of Dialogic Drawing for interdisciplinary research significant to early childhood. The participating children revealed they perceive drawing as the child’s domain, endorsing Dialogic Drawing as a relevant and accessible method with capacity to gain untapped information significant to qualitative researchers seeking to elicit the authentic perspectives of children.","PeriodicalId":31797,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogic Drawing: A Method for Researching Abstract Phenomenon in Early Childhood\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Ruscoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23644583-bja10036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article explores the theoretical, ethical, and practical opportunities and constraints considered in the methodological design and use of Dialogic Drawing, a participatory method for accessing qualitative data with young children. The method was designed to gather data about abstract phenomena from young children, as part of a larger study investigating the impact of discursive affordances in the first year of compulsory school in Western Australia. Methodological findings are reported from the application of Dialogic Drawing with 28 five-year-old children from diverse school-based semiotic landscapes in the Perth metropolitan area in Western Australia. Three strands of analysis are described and critiqued: drawn product, drawing process, and approach to drawing. Thematic analysis of drawn visual schema, dialog and embodied behaviours highlights the potential reach of Dialogic Drawing for interdisciplinary research significant to early childhood. The participating children revealed they perceive drawing as the child’s domain, endorsing Dialogic Drawing as a relevant and accessible method with capacity to gain untapped information significant to qualitative researchers seeking to elicit the authentic perspectives of children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23644583-bja10036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了对话绘画的方法设计和使用中所考虑的理论、伦理和实践机会和限制,对话绘画是一种与幼儿一起获取定性数据的参与方法。该方法旨在收集幼儿抽象现象的数据,这是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究调查了西澳大利亚义务教育一年级话语可供性的影响。报告了对话绘画在西澳大利亚珀斯大都会区对来自不同学校符号景观的28名五岁儿童的应用的方法学发现。对三种分析方法进行了描述和批评:绘制产品、绘制过程和绘制方法。对绘画视觉图式、对话和具体行为的主题分析突出了对话绘画在跨学科研究中的潜在影响,对幼儿期有重要意义。参与研究的儿童表示,他们认为绘画是儿童的领域,支持对话绘画是一种相关且可获得的方法,能够获得对寻求儿童真实视角的定性研究人员来说重要的未开发信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialogic Drawing: A Method for Researching Abstract Phenomenon in Early Childhood
This article explores the theoretical, ethical, and practical opportunities and constraints considered in the methodological design and use of Dialogic Drawing, a participatory method for accessing qualitative data with young children. The method was designed to gather data about abstract phenomena from young children, as part of a larger study investigating the impact of discursive affordances in the first year of compulsory school in Western Australia. Methodological findings are reported from the application of Dialogic Drawing with 28 five-year-old children from diverse school-based semiotic landscapes in the Perth metropolitan area in Western Australia. Three strands of analysis are described and critiqued: drawn product, drawing process, and approach to drawing. Thematic analysis of drawn visual schema, dialog and embodied behaviours highlights the potential reach of Dialogic Drawing for interdisciplinary research significant to early childhood. The participating children revealed they perceive drawing as the child’s domain, endorsing Dialogic Drawing as a relevant and accessible method with capacity to gain untapped information significant to qualitative researchers seeking to elicit the authentic perspectives of children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy
Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信