保护的终结:丹麦的“范式转变”和停止法

Q2 Social Sciences
N. Tan
{"title":"保护的终结:丹麦的“范式转变”和停止法","authors":"N. Tan","doi":"10.1163/15718107-BJA10009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution discusses the recent ‘paradigm shift’ in Danish refugee policy towards temporary protection and return in light of the law of cessation. The article provides an overview of cessation standards drawing on the 1951 Refugee Convention, complementary protection under human rights law and the concept of temporary protection, before setting out the legislative changes making up the Danish ‘paradigm shift’. The Danish case reveals a structural gap in the law of cessation as it regards to complementary protection. The lack of a comprehensive complementary protection framework in some jurisdictions leaves the law open to governments wishing to instrumentalise and minimise protection obligations. Finally, the article analyses legal and policy implications of the policy turn, discussing Denmark’s potential role as a forerunner in temporary protection and cessation; gaps in the law of cessation vis-a-vis complementary protection; and calling for increased scholarly focus on the law of cessation.","PeriodicalId":34997,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of International Law","volume":"90 1","pages":"60-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The End of Protection: The Danish ‘Paradigm Shift’ and the Law of Cessation\",\"authors\":\"N. Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718107-BJA10009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution discusses the recent ‘paradigm shift’ in Danish refugee policy towards temporary protection and return in light of the law of cessation. The article provides an overview of cessation standards drawing on the 1951 Refugee Convention, complementary protection under human rights law and the concept of temporary protection, before setting out the legislative changes making up the Danish ‘paradigm shift’. The Danish case reveals a structural gap in the law of cessation as it regards to complementary protection. The lack of a comprehensive complementary protection framework in some jurisdictions leaves the law open to governments wishing to instrumentalise and minimise protection obligations. Finally, the article analyses legal and policy implications of the policy turn, discussing Denmark’s potential role as a forerunner in temporary protection and cessation; gaps in the law of cessation vis-a-vis complementary protection; and calling for increased scholarly focus on the law of cessation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"60-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-BJA10009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-BJA10009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章讨论了最近丹麦难民政策的“范式转变”,即根据停止法临时保护和返回。本文概述了根据1951年《难民公约》制定的停止标准,人权法下的补充保护和临时保护概念,然后阐述了构成丹麦“范式转变”的立法变化。丹麦的案例揭示了戒烟法在补充保护方面的结构性差距。一些司法管辖区缺乏全面的补充保护框架,使得希望将保护义务工具化和最小化的政府可以利用法律。最后,文章分析了政策转向的法律和政策含义,讨论了丹麦作为临时保护和停止的先驱的潜在作用;戒烟法与补充保护之间的差距;并呼吁加强对戒烟法的学术关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The End of Protection: The Danish ‘Paradigm Shift’ and the Law of Cessation
This contribution discusses the recent ‘paradigm shift’ in Danish refugee policy towards temporary protection and return in light of the law of cessation. The article provides an overview of cessation standards drawing on the 1951 Refugee Convention, complementary protection under human rights law and the concept of temporary protection, before setting out the legislative changes making up the Danish ‘paradigm shift’. The Danish case reveals a structural gap in the law of cessation as it regards to complementary protection. The lack of a comprehensive complementary protection framework in some jurisdictions leaves the law open to governments wishing to instrumentalise and minimise protection obligations. Finally, the article analyses legal and policy implications of the policy turn, discussing Denmark’s potential role as a forerunner in temporary protection and cessation; gaps in the law of cessation vis-a-vis complementary protection; and calling for increased scholarly focus on the law of cessation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Established in 1930, the Nordic Journal of International Law has remained the principal forum in the Nordic countries for the scholarly exchange on legal developments in the international and European domains. Combining broad thematic coverage with rigorous quality demands, it aims to present current practice and its theoretical reflection within the different branches of international law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信