《奥胡斯公约》中的诉诸司法——起源、立法历史和主要解释困境概述

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
J. Jendrośka
{"title":"《奥胡斯公约》中的诉诸司法——起源、立法历史和主要解释困境概述","authors":"J. Jendrośka","doi":"10.1163/18760104-01704003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article present the key elements of the access to justice pillar of the Arhus Convention against the background of its legislative history, conceptual approaches and motivations laying behind certain provisions. On this basis, the article identifies and briefly indicates the main interpretation dilemmas regarding specific provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 9 as well as those which apply to access to justice pillar as a whole, in particular the interpretation dilemmas regarding the internal relations between these provisions and the role of this pillar in relation to the other pillars, in particular the public participation pillar. The conclusion is that while the structure of Article 9 is quite clear, as a result of the negotiations certain terms or formulations were introduced which not always convey a clear legal norm and therefore require a thorough examination and certain interpretation. In this context a holistic approach is advocated with the aim to see the Convention as certain logical system in which textual (literal) interpretation of the Convention’s provisions is supplemented with – and give priority to – the systemic, purposive and even historical interpretations.","PeriodicalId":43633,"journal":{"name":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to Justice in the Aarhus Convention – Genesis, Legislative History and Overview of the Main Interpretation Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"J. Jendrośka\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18760104-01704003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe article present the key elements of the access to justice pillar of the Arhus Convention against the background of its legislative history, conceptual approaches and motivations laying behind certain provisions. On this basis, the article identifies and briefly indicates the main interpretation dilemmas regarding specific provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 9 as well as those which apply to access to justice pillar as a whole, in particular the interpretation dilemmas regarding the internal relations between these provisions and the role of this pillar in relation to the other pillars, in particular the public participation pillar. The conclusion is that while the structure of Article 9 is quite clear, as a result of the negotiations certain terms or formulations were introduced which not always convey a clear legal norm and therefore require a thorough examination and certain interpretation. In this context a holistic approach is advocated with the aim to see the Convention as certain logical system in which textual (literal) interpretation of the Convention’s provisions is supplemented with – and give priority to – the systemic, purposive and even historical interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01704003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01704003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文以《奥胡斯公约》的立法历史、概念方法和某些条款背后的动机为背景,介绍了《奥胡斯公约》诉诸司法支柱的关键要素。在此基础上,本文确定并简要指出了与第9条第1款、第2款和第3款的具体规定有关的主要解释困境,以及适用于整个司法救助支柱的解释困境,特别是与这些条款之间的内部关系以及该支柱相对于其他支柱(特别是公众参与支柱)的作用有关的解释困境。结论是,虽然第9条的结构相当清楚,但由于谈判的结果,采用了某些条款或措词,这些条款或措词并不总是传达明确的法律规范,因此需要彻底审查和作出某些解释。在这方面,提倡采取整体办法,目的是将《公约》视为某种逻辑系统,在这种系统中,对《公约》条款的文本(字面)解释以系统的、有目的的甚至历史的解释为补充,并优先考虑这种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to Justice in the Aarhus Convention – Genesis, Legislative History and Overview of the Main Interpretation Dilemmas
The article present the key elements of the access to justice pillar of the Arhus Convention against the background of its legislative history, conceptual approaches and motivations laying behind certain provisions. On this basis, the article identifies and briefly indicates the main interpretation dilemmas regarding specific provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Article 9 as well as those which apply to access to justice pillar as a whole, in particular the interpretation dilemmas regarding the internal relations between these provisions and the role of this pillar in relation to the other pillars, in particular the public participation pillar. The conclusion is that while the structure of Article 9 is quite clear, as a result of the negotiations certain terms or formulations were introduced which not always convey a clear legal norm and therefore require a thorough examination and certain interpretation. In this context a holistic approach is advocated with the aim to see the Convention as certain logical system in which textual (literal) interpretation of the Convention’s provisions is supplemented with – and give priority to – the systemic, purposive and even historical interpretations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信