土耳其漫长六十年代的新左派：库尔德68年代与土耳其工人党

IF 0.2 4区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

Turkish Historical Review Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.1163/18775462-bja10026

Azat Zana Gündoğan

{"title":"土耳其漫长六十年代的新左派：库尔德68年代与土耳其工人党","authors":"Azat Zana Gündoğan","doi":"10.1163/18775462-bja10026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nGlobal 1968 stood in opposition to the two major social movements of the previous two centuries, namely the nationalist movements and the old left. Turkey entered into this epoch as a Third World country with a record of broken promises to various social groups, including the Kurds. This article focuses on the Kurdish ’68ers who protested the systematic oppression, exploitation, and forced assimilation of the Kemalist Republic through new action repertoires and organizational capabilities. It explores their particular subjectivity and agency and analyzes their unlikely alliance with the Workers’ Party of Turkey (tİp). The article’s overarching argument is that the Turkish left’s historical burden of nation-state centrism and a Turkish national identity determined the failure of the New Left in Turkey. In contrast, the Kurdish left was able to carry on the legacy of the New Left and the ’68ers today because of the said historical subjectivity and agency.","PeriodicalId":41042,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Historical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New Left in Turkey’s Long Sixties: The Kurdish ’68ers and the Workers’ Party of Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Azat Zana Gündoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18775462-bja10026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nGlobal 1968 stood in opposition to the two major social movements of the previous two centuries, namely the nationalist movements and the old left. Turkey entered into this epoch as a Third World country with a record of broken promises to various social groups, including the Kurds. This article focuses on the Kurdish ’68ers who protested the systematic oppression, exploitation, and forced assimilation of the Kemalist Republic through new action repertoires and organizational capabilities. It explores their particular subjectivity and agency and analyzes their unlikely alliance with the Workers’ Party of Turkey (tİp). The article’s overarching argument is that the Turkish left’s historical burden of nation-state centrism and a Turkish national identity determined the failure of the New Left in Turkey. In contrast, the Kurdish left was able to carry on the legacy of the New Left and the ’68ers today because of the said historical subjectivity and agency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Historical Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18775462-bja10026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18775462-bja10026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1968年全球运动与前两个世纪的两大社会运动，即民族主义运动和老左派运动，是对立的。土耳其作为一个第三世界国家进入了这个时代，它对包括库尔德人在内的各种社会群体的承诺都没有兑现。本文关注的是库尔德68人，他们通过新的行动纲领和组织能力抗议凯末尔共和国的系统性压迫、剥削和强迫同化。它探讨了他们特殊的主体性和能动性，并分析了他们与土耳其工人党(tİp)不太可能的联盟。这篇文章的主要论点是，土耳其左翼的民族国家中心主义和土耳其民族认同的历史负担决定了新左派在土耳其的失败。相比之下，库尔德左翼今天能够继承新左派和68年代人的遗产，是因为上述的历史主体性和能动性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The New Left in Turkey’s Long Sixties: The Kurdish ’68ers and the Workers’ Party of Turkey

Global 1968 stood in opposition to the two major social movements of the previous two centuries, namely the nationalist movements and the old left. Turkey entered into this epoch as a Third World country with a record of broken promises to various social groups, including the Kurds. This article focuses on the Kurdish ’68ers who protested the systematic oppression, exploitation, and forced assimilation of the Kemalist Republic through new action repertoires and organizational capabilities. It explores their particular subjectivity and agency and analyzes their unlikely alliance with the Workers’ Party of Turkey (tİp). The article’s overarching argument is that the Turkish left’s historical burden of nation-state centrism and a Turkish national identity determined the failure of the New Left in Turkey. In contrast, the Kurdish left was able to carry on the legacy of the New Left and the ’68ers today because of the said historical subjectivity and agency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Turkish Historical Review HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Turkish Historical Review is devoted to Turkish history in the widest sense, covering the period from the 6th century, with the rise of the Turks in Central Asia, to the 20th century. All contributions to the journal must display a substantial use of primary-source material and also be accessible to historians in general, i.e. those working outside the specific fields of Ottoman and Turkish history. Articles with a comparative scope which cross the traditional boundaries of the area studies paradigm are therefore very welcome. The editors also encourage younger scholars to submit contributions. The journal includes a reviews section, which, in addition to publications in English, French, and other western European languages, will specifically monitor new studies in Turkish and those coming out in the Balkans, Russia and the Middle East. The Turkish Historical Review has a double-blind peer review system.