Václav Paris现代主义史诗的演变(综述)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
D. Hand
{"title":"Václav Paris现代主义史诗的演变(综述)","authors":"D. Hand","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2022.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I looked for books by non-white authors that engage in the same kind of metamedial contemplations of the novel and the book, none of them did quite what Panko describes. In fact, many of them—Dionne Brand’s Theory, for example, or Charles Yu’s Interior Chinatown, both experimental and metamedial novels in their own right3—are concerned with the invisibility of their subjects to the very systems attempting to capture them. This perspective (which, arguably, is evident in Ulysses as well) pushes back against the novel as an archival genre or, rather, considers the colonial violence of archives and thus strategically attempts to elude their contextualizing force. Indeed, considering that Joyce was writing from a perspective of contingent whiteness in a moment of his nation’s revolution from colonialism, Ulysses’s place as the starting point of this study invites a turn to authors who are similarly marginalized by regimes of power. Ultimately, my own desire to push beyond Panko’s case studies, to extend this theorization into different texts, is, in fact, a recognition of Out of Print’s efficacy: I am drawn to think alongside and against this book. But I remain wary about any theorizing of informationmanagement systems that excludes the perspectives of those who have been most harmed by these very systems.","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":"59 1","pages":"733 - 736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolutions of Modernist Epic by Václav Paris (review)\",\"authors\":\"D. Hand\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2022.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When I looked for books by non-white authors that engage in the same kind of metamedial contemplations of the novel and the book, none of them did quite what Panko describes. In fact, many of them—Dionne Brand’s Theory, for example, or Charles Yu’s Interior Chinatown, both experimental and metamedial novels in their own right3—are concerned with the invisibility of their subjects to the very systems attempting to capture them. This perspective (which, arguably, is evident in Ulysses as well) pushes back against the novel as an archival genre or, rather, considers the colonial violence of archives and thus strategically attempts to elude their contextualizing force. Indeed, considering that Joyce was writing from a perspective of contingent whiteness in a moment of his nation’s revolution from colonialism, Ulysses’s place as the starting point of this study invites a turn to authors who are similarly marginalized by regimes of power. Ultimately, my own desire to push beyond Panko’s case studies, to extend this theorization into different texts, is, in fact, a recognition of Out of Print’s efficacy: I am drawn to think alongside and against this book. But I remain wary about any theorizing of informationmanagement systems that excludes the perspectives of those who have been most harmed by these very systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"733 - 736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我寻找非白人作家的书,他们对小说和这本书进行了同样的元媒介思考时,没有一本书像潘科所描述的那样。事实上,他们中的许多人——比如Dionne Brand的《唐人街内部》,或者Charles Yu的《中国城内部》,都是实验小说和元媒体小说3——都关心他们的主体对试图捕捉他们的系统的不可见性。这种观点(可以说,在《尤利西斯》中也很明显)反对将小说作为一种档案类型,或者更确切地说,考虑档案的殖民暴力,从而从战略上试图避开其语境化的力量。事实上,考虑到乔伊斯在他的国家从殖民主义革命的时刻是从偶然的白人角度写作的,尤利西斯作为这项研究的起点,邀请了同样被权力政权边缘化的作家。最终,我自己想要超越潘科的案例研究,将这种理论扩展到不同的文本中,事实上,这是对《绝版》功效的认可:我被吸引来与这本书并肩思考和反对这本书。但我仍然对任何将那些受到这些系统伤害最大的人的观点排除在外的信息管理系统理论持谨慎态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolutions of Modernist Epic by Václav Paris (review)
When I looked for books by non-white authors that engage in the same kind of metamedial contemplations of the novel and the book, none of them did quite what Panko describes. In fact, many of them—Dionne Brand’s Theory, for example, or Charles Yu’s Interior Chinatown, both experimental and metamedial novels in their own right3—are concerned with the invisibility of their subjects to the very systems attempting to capture them. This perspective (which, arguably, is evident in Ulysses as well) pushes back against the novel as an archival genre or, rather, considers the colonial violence of archives and thus strategically attempts to elude their contextualizing force. Indeed, considering that Joyce was writing from a perspective of contingent whiteness in a moment of his nation’s revolution from colonialism, Ulysses’s place as the starting point of this study invites a turn to authors who are similarly marginalized by regimes of power. Ultimately, my own desire to push beyond Panko’s case studies, to extend this theorization into different texts, is, in fact, a recognition of Out of Print’s efficacy: I am drawn to think alongside and against this book. But I remain wary about any theorizing of informationmanagement systems that excludes the perspectives of those who have been most harmed by these very systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信