公私伙伴关系、社会影响债券和加拿大国家的侵蚀

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Loxley, J. Hajer
{"title":"公私伙伴关系、社会影响债券和加拿大国家的侵蚀","authors":"J. Loxley, J. Hajer","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public–private partnerships and social impact bonds are both forms of private sector encroachment on state activity and are new frontiers of commodification that rely, ultimately, on subsidies or concessions from the state. This article provides an update on both models in the Canadian context, and it reviews theories that rationalize their emergence and growth. Both models have been nurtured by direct and indirect government support, as opposed to any demonstrated superiority, raising concerns that these models are proceeding contrary to the public interest.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"100 1","pages":"18 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public–private partnerships, social impact bonds, and the erosion of the state in Canada\",\"authors\":\"J. Loxley, J. Hajer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Public–private partnerships and social impact bonds are both forms of private sector encroachment on state activity and are new frontiers of commodification that rely, ultimately, on subsidies or concessions from the state. This article provides an update on both models in the Canadian context, and it reviews theories that rationalize their emergence and growth. Both models have been nurtured by direct and indirect government support, as opposed to any demonstrated superiority, raising concerns that these models are proceeding contrary to the public interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2019.1612167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

公私伙伴关系和社会影响债券都是私营部门侵犯国家活动的形式,也是最终依赖于国家补贴或让步的商品化的新领域。本文在加拿大的背景下对这两种模式进行了更新,并回顾了使它们的出现和发展合理化的理论。这两种模式都得到了政府的直接和间接支持,而不是任何表现出的优势,这引起了人们对这些模式违背公众利益的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public–private partnerships, social impact bonds, and the erosion of the state in Canada
Abstract Public–private partnerships and social impact bonds are both forms of private sector encroachment on state activity and are new frontiers of commodification that rely, ultimately, on subsidies or concessions from the state. This article provides an update on both models in the Canadian context, and it reviews theories that rationalize their emergence and growth. Both models have been nurtured by direct and indirect government support, as opposed to any demonstrated superiority, raising concerns that these models are proceeding contrary to the public interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信