协同变异性、节点和网格:关键戏剧生态学——导论

IF 0.4 0 THEATER
M. Middeke, Martin Riedelsheimer
{"title":"协同变异性、节点和网格:关键戏剧生态学——导论","authors":"M. Middeke, Martin Riedelsheimer","doi":"10.1515/jcde-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical theatre ecologies are a field within the environmental humanities. Ecology is usually understood as “ the study of the relationships between living organisms, including humans, and their physical environment ” ( “ What Is Ecology? ” ; see also Alaimo 100). It is therefore little wonder that notions of interconnected-ness and interrelationality are at the centre of an endeavour that seeks to trace the theatre ’ s ecologies. We use the term critical theatre ecologies , rather than theatre ecology , to try to do justice to the multitude of approaches, methodologies, and text- and performance-related phenomena the ecological engagements of the theatre entail. When we speak of critical theatre ecologies, we imply that each of these approaches, each methodology, and each reflection on these aforemen-tioned phenomena must always and necessarily entail a self-reflexive perspective that interrogates the avenues and the limitations of their theoretical horizons. make an appropriately complex diagnosis of the present. diagnosis, as we shall see in the articles collected in and The results of critical theatre ecologies are decisive answers and fresh perspectives to the central challenges of what the German sociol-ogist Ulrich Beck has influentially called “ world risk society. ” This special issue corroborates that what is needed are inter- and transdisciplinary approaches and thus the explicit participation and profiling of the arts, of the theatre in particular, and of the humanities in general. Texts are environmental, not simply because they are made of paper and ink that comes from trees and plants (or other terrestrial sources), or because they are sometimes about ecological matters. Reading is formally ecological, since in order to read we must take ac-count of the dark sides of things, as intimately connected to the “ lighter ” sides as the recto and verso of a piece of writing paper. Reading discovers a constantly flowing, shifting play of temporality, and a constant process of differentiation – like evolution. All texts are environmental: they organise the space around and within them into plays of meaning and non-meaning. ( “ Deconstruction and/as Ecology ” 292)","PeriodicalId":41187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Mutability, Nodes, and the Mesh: Critical Theatre Ecologies – An Introduction\",\"authors\":\"M. Middeke, Martin Riedelsheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jcde-2022-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical theatre ecologies are a field within the environmental humanities. Ecology is usually understood as “ the study of the relationships between living organisms, including humans, and their physical environment ” ( “ What Is Ecology? ” ; see also Alaimo 100). It is therefore little wonder that notions of interconnected-ness and interrelationality are at the centre of an endeavour that seeks to trace the theatre ’ s ecologies. We use the term critical theatre ecologies , rather than theatre ecology , to try to do justice to the multitude of approaches, methodologies, and text- and performance-related phenomena the ecological engagements of the theatre entail. When we speak of critical theatre ecologies, we imply that each of these approaches, each methodology, and each reflection on these aforemen-tioned phenomena must always and necessarily entail a self-reflexive perspective that interrogates the avenues and the limitations of their theoretical horizons. make an appropriately complex diagnosis of the present. diagnosis, as we shall see in the articles collected in and The results of critical theatre ecologies are decisive answers and fresh perspectives to the central challenges of what the German sociol-ogist Ulrich Beck has influentially called “ world risk society. ” This special issue corroborates that what is needed are inter- and transdisciplinary approaches and thus the explicit participation and profiling of the arts, of the theatre in particular, and of the humanities in general. Texts are environmental, not simply because they are made of paper and ink that comes from trees and plants (or other terrestrial sources), or because they are sometimes about ecological matters. Reading is formally ecological, since in order to read we must take ac-count of the dark sides of things, as intimately connected to the “ lighter ” sides as the recto and verso of a piece of writing paper. Reading discovers a constantly flowing, shifting play of temporality, and a constant process of differentiation – like evolution. All texts are environmental: they organise the space around and within them into plays of meaning and non-meaning. ( “ Deconstruction and/as Ecology ” 292)\",\"PeriodicalId\":41187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2022-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Drama in English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcde-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

批判剧场生态学是环境人文学科的一个领域。生态学通常被理解为“研究包括人类在内的生物有机体与其自然环境之间关系的学科”(《什么是生态学?”;参见Alaimo 100)。因此,毫不奇怪,相互联系和相互关系的概念是试图追踪剧院生态的努力的核心。我们使用“批判戏剧生态学”这个术语,而不是“戏剧生态学”,试图公正地对待戏剧生态参与所带来的众多方法、方法论以及与文本和表演相关的现象。当我们谈到批判性戏剧生态学时,我们的意思是,每一种方法,每一种方法论,以及对上述现象的每一种反思,都必须始终而且必然地包含一种自我反思的视角,这种视角询问了它们的理论视野的途径和局限性。对现在做出适当的复杂诊断。批判性剧场生态学的结果是对德国社会学家乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)颇具影响力地称之为“世界风险社会”的核心挑战的决定性答案和新鲜视角。这一特殊问题证实,我们需要的是跨学科和跨学科的方法,从而明确参与和描绘艺术,特别是戏剧,以及一般的人文学科。文本是环境的,不仅因为它们是由来自树木和植物(或其他陆地资源)的纸和墨水制成的,也因为它们有时是关于生态问题的。阅读在形式上是生态的,因为为了阅读,我们必须考虑到事物的阴暗面,就像一张书写纸的正反两面一样,与“光明”的一面紧密相连。阅读发现了一种不断流动、变化的时间性游戏,以及一种不断分化的进化过程。所有文本都是环境:它们将周围和内部的空间组织成有意义和无意义的游戏。(《解构与/作为生态学》292页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-Mutability, Nodes, and the Mesh: Critical Theatre Ecologies – An Introduction
Critical theatre ecologies are a field within the environmental humanities. Ecology is usually understood as “ the study of the relationships between living organisms, including humans, and their physical environment ” ( “ What Is Ecology? ” ; see also Alaimo 100). It is therefore little wonder that notions of interconnected-ness and interrelationality are at the centre of an endeavour that seeks to trace the theatre ’ s ecologies. We use the term critical theatre ecologies , rather than theatre ecology , to try to do justice to the multitude of approaches, methodologies, and text- and performance-related phenomena the ecological engagements of the theatre entail. When we speak of critical theatre ecologies, we imply that each of these approaches, each methodology, and each reflection on these aforemen-tioned phenomena must always and necessarily entail a self-reflexive perspective that interrogates the avenues and the limitations of their theoretical horizons. make an appropriately complex diagnosis of the present. diagnosis, as we shall see in the articles collected in and The results of critical theatre ecologies are decisive answers and fresh perspectives to the central challenges of what the German sociol-ogist Ulrich Beck has influentially called “ world risk society. ” This special issue corroborates that what is needed are inter- and transdisciplinary approaches and thus the explicit participation and profiling of the arts, of the theatre in particular, and of the humanities in general. Texts are environmental, not simply because they are made of paper and ink that comes from trees and plants (or other terrestrial sources), or because they are sometimes about ecological matters. Reading is formally ecological, since in order to read we must take ac-count of the dark sides of things, as intimately connected to the “ lighter ” sides as the recto and verso of a piece of writing paper. Reading discovers a constantly flowing, shifting play of temporality, and a constant process of differentiation – like evolution. All texts are environmental: they organise the space around and within them into plays of meaning and non-meaning. ( “ Deconstruction and/as Ecology ” 292)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信