学生-教师的行动研究故事:改变并不容易,需要时间、精力和批判性反思

Q3 Social Sciences
Nicolina Eriksson, Jan-Erik Romar, B. Dyson
{"title":"学生-教师的行动研究故事:改变并不容易,需要时间、精力和批判性反思","authors":"Nicolina Eriksson, Jan-Erik Romar, B. Dyson","doi":"10.3224/IJAR.V13I1.27617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionA new national curriculum will be implemented in Finland at the beginning of the 20162017 school year. Although the Finnish education system is already child-centered and liberal (Sahlberg 2011), the overall goal of the new curriculum is to give students more independence by giving them responsibility for their own learning through an emphasis on the joy of learning and students' active role (Finnish National Board of Education 2015). More specifically, in physical education (PE), students should become active participants who are able to cooperate and help each other (Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014). This significant change is one reason teachers should find new methods of teaching physical education. For the first time ever, model-based practice and Sport Education (SE) in particular have been included in the teacher guidelines of the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (Utbildningsstyrelsen 2014) as a method of enriching PE.The SE model is an internationally used and researched model that has had several positive outcomes (Layne & Hastie 2015), and it will be further developed in later sections. It is also gaining more traction in countries that do not primarily speak English, though studies in these countries are still limited, as well as textbooks in languages other than English (Glotova 2011). There is a gap in the literature base about model-based practice in Scandinavia (Romar 2013; Romar, Ahlroos, Flykt, & Penttinen 2015). Although there has been an initial effort in Finland (Romar, Henriksson, Ketomaki, & Hastie 2016), there is still a need for more research on the implementation of SE in Finnish schools.In addition, Araujo, Mesquita, and Hastie (2014) pointed out that there are still several gaps in international SE research, which they suggested could be filled through action research in SE. This was one of the main reasons I wanted to study SE through action research. I chose to do so during my final student-teacher experience as a way of increasing my knowledge of innovative model-based practices, which are also expected in researchbased teacher education programmes in Finland (Niemi & Nevgi 2014). Research-oriented teacher education has received credit as well as criticism due to the relation between research and practice. By situating action research in teacher education, educators assume that authentic researcher experiences will help preservice teachers translate theory into practice, particularly when dealing with innovative instructional strategies (Kemmis 2010). Furthermore, Eklund (2014) proposed that action research could be a solution to preservice teachers' dilemma. Though teachers understand and see the logic of the research orientation, they feel that research-based teacher education does not give them enough practical tools.All first-person references in this article refer to Nicolina, as I was the practitioner in this study. When drawing conclusions and implications, all three authors' voices will be heard. Jan-Erik and Ben, the silent coauthors in this paper, were experienced university faculty members who have expertise in the use of SE and action research, respectively. JanErik was the master's thesis supervisor, and we constructed the SE unit, discussed data collection, analysed the data, and discussed the findings together. He also challenged my understanding of the whole process. Ben provided an outside audit, giving peer debriefings and acting as a critical friend in order to challenge my interpretations of the student-teacher experience.Action ResearchBy definition, action research is when practitioners systematically investigate their own practice, to understand and improve it (Huang 2010; McNiff & Whitehead 2006). Besides developing and changing the practice, practitioners use action research to understand the change process (Newby 2010). Action research has been implemented in several ways, and one general feature is an approach where new knowledge is generated through changeoriented activities (Kalliola 2009). …","PeriodicalId":39289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Action Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"51-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Action Research story of a student–teacher: Change is not easy and it takes time, effort, and critical reflection\",\"authors\":\"Nicolina Eriksson, Jan-Erik Romar, B. Dyson\",\"doi\":\"10.3224/IJAR.V13I1.27617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionA new national curriculum will be implemented in Finland at the beginning of the 20162017 school year. Although the Finnish education system is already child-centered and liberal (Sahlberg 2011), the overall goal of the new curriculum is to give students more independence by giving them responsibility for their own learning through an emphasis on the joy of learning and students' active role (Finnish National Board of Education 2015). More specifically, in physical education (PE), students should become active participants who are able to cooperate and help each other (Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014). This significant change is one reason teachers should find new methods of teaching physical education. For the first time ever, model-based practice and Sport Education (SE) in particular have been included in the teacher guidelines of the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (Utbildningsstyrelsen 2014) as a method of enriching PE.The SE model is an internationally used and researched model that has had several positive outcomes (Layne & Hastie 2015), and it will be further developed in later sections. It is also gaining more traction in countries that do not primarily speak English, though studies in these countries are still limited, as well as textbooks in languages other than English (Glotova 2011). There is a gap in the literature base about model-based practice in Scandinavia (Romar 2013; Romar, Ahlroos, Flykt, & Penttinen 2015). Although there has been an initial effort in Finland (Romar, Henriksson, Ketomaki, & Hastie 2016), there is still a need for more research on the implementation of SE in Finnish schools.In addition, Araujo, Mesquita, and Hastie (2014) pointed out that there are still several gaps in international SE research, which they suggested could be filled through action research in SE. This was one of the main reasons I wanted to study SE through action research. I chose to do so during my final student-teacher experience as a way of increasing my knowledge of innovative model-based practices, which are also expected in researchbased teacher education programmes in Finland (Niemi & Nevgi 2014). Research-oriented teacher education has received credit as well as criticism due to the relation between research and practice. By situating action research in teacher education, educators assume that authentic researcher experiences will help preservice teachers translate theory into practice, particularly when dealing with innovative instructional strategies (Kemmis 2010). Furthermore, Eklund (2014) proposed that action research could be a solution to preservice teachers' dilemma. Though teachers understand and see the logic of the research orientation, they feel that research-based teacher education does not give them enough practical tools.All first-person references in this article refer to Nicolina, as I was the practitioner in this study. When drawing conclusions and implications, all three authors' voices will be heard. Jan-Erik and Ben, the silent coauthors in this paper, were experienced university faculty members who have expertise in the use of SE and action research, respectively. JanErik was the master's thesis supervisor, and we constructed the SE unit, discussed data collection, analysed the data, and discussed the findings together. He also challenged my understanding of the whole process. Ben provided an outside audit, giving peer debriefings and acting as a critical friend in order to challenge my interpretations of the student-teacher experience.Action ResearchBy definition, action research is when practitioners systematically investigate their own practice, to understand and improve it (Huang 2010; McNiff & Whitehead 2006). Besides developing and changing the practice, practitioners use action research to understand the change process (Newby 2010). Action research has been implemented in several ways, and one general feature is an approach where new knowledge is generated through changeoriented activities (Kalliola 2009). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Action Research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"51-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3224/IJAR.V13I1.27617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/IJAR.V13I1.27617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

引言芬兰将在20162017学年开始实施新的国家课程。尽管芬兰的教育体系已经是以儿童为中心和自由主义的(Sahlberg,2011年),但新课程的总体目标是通过强调学习的乐趣和学生的积极作用,赋予学生更多的独立性,让他们对自己的学习负责(芬兰国家教育委员会,2015年)。更具体地说,在体育教育中,学生应该成为能够相互合作和帮助的积极参与者(芬兰国家基础教育核心课程2014)。这一重大变化是教师应该寻找新的体育教学方法的原因之一。有史以来第一次,基于模型的实践和体育教育(SE)被纳入芬兰国家基础教育核心课程(Utbildningsstyrelsen,2014)的教师指南,作为丰富体育的一种方法。SE模式是一种国际上使用和研究的模式,取得了一些积极成果(Layne&Hastie,2015),它将在后面的章节中进一步发展。它在主要不说英语的国家也越来越受欢迎,尽管在这些国家的研究仍然有限,而且教科书上也有英语以外的语言(Glotova,2011年)。关于斯堪的纳维亚基于模型的实践的文献基础存在差距(Romar 2013;Romar、Ahlroos、Flykt和Penttinen,2015年)。尽管芬兰已经做出了初步努力(Romar、Henriksson、Ketomaki和Hastie 2016),但仍需要对SE在芬兰学校的实施进行更多研究。此外,Araujo、Mesquita和Hastie(2014)指出,国际SE研究仍存在一些空白,他们建议可以通过SE的行动研究来填补这些空白。这是我想通过行动研究来研究SE的主要原因之一。我选择在我的最后一次师生体验中这样做,是为了增加我对创新的基于模型的实践的了解,这些实践也有望在芬兰的基于研究的教师教育计划中出现(Niemi&Nevgi,2014)。由于研究与实践的关系,研究型教师教育受到了赞扬和批评。通过将行动研究置于教师教育中,教育工作者认为,真实的研究人员经验将有助于职前教师将理论转化为实践,特别是在处理创新教学策略时(Kemmis,2010)。此外,Eklund(2014)提出,行动研究可以解决职前教师的困境。尽管教师们理解并看到了研究取向的逻辑,但他们认为基于研究的教师教育并没有给他们足够的实用工具。这篇文章中所有的第一人称参考都是指Nicolina,因为我是这项研究的实践者。在得出结论和含义时,三位作者的声音都会被听到。本文的沉默合著者Jan Erik和Ben是经验丰富的大学教员,他们分别在SE和行动研究的使用方面具有专业知识。JanErik是硕士论文的导师,我们构建了SE单元,讨论了数据收集,分析了数据,并共同讨论了研究结果。他还挑战了我对整个过程的理解。本提供了一次外部审计,向同学们汇报情况,并充当了一个挑剔的朋友,以挑战我对师生经历的理解。行动研究根据定义,行动研究是指从业者系统地调查自己的实践,以理解和改进它(Huang 2010;McNiff和Whitehead,2006年)。除了发展和改变实践之外,从业者还使用行动研究来了解变化过程(Newby 2010)。行动研究以多种方式实施,其中一个普遍特征是通过以变革为导向的活动产生新知识的方法(Kalliola,2009年)…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Action Research story of a student–teacher: Change is not easy and it takes time, effort, and critical reflection
IntroductionA new national curriculum will be implemented in Finland at the beginning of the 20162017 school year. Although the Finnish education system is already child-centered and liberal (Sahlberg 2011), the overall goal of the new curriculum is to give students more independence by giving them responsibility for their own learning through an emphasis on the joy of learning and students' active role (Finnish National Board of Education 2015). More specifically, in physical education (PE), students should become active participants who are able to cooperate and help each other (Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014). This significant change is one reason teachers should find new methods of teaching physical education. For the first time ever, model-based practice and Sport Education (SE) in particular have been included in the teacher guidelines of the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (Utbildningsstyrelsen 2014) as a method of enriching PE.The SE model is an internationally used and researched model that has had several positive outcomes (Layne & Hastie 2015), and it will be further developed in later sections. It is also gaining more traction in countries that do not primarily speak English, though studies in these countries are still limited, as well as textbooks in languages other than English (Glotova 2011). There is a gap in the literature base about model-based practice in Scandinavia (Romar 2013; Romar, Ahlroos, Flykt, & Penttinen 2015). Although there has been an initial effort in Finland (Romar, Henriksson, Ketomaki, & Hastie 2016), there is still a need for more research on the implementation of SE in Finnish schools.In addition, Araujo, Mesquita, and Hastie (2014) pointed out that there are still several gaps in international SE research, which they suggested could be filled through action research in SE. This was one of the main reasons I wanted to study SE through action research. I chose to do so during my final student-teacher experience as a way of increasing my knowledge of innovative model-based practices, which are also expected in researchbased teacher education programmes in Finland (Niemi & Nevgi 2014). Research-oriented teacher education has received credit as well as criticism due to the relation between research and practice. By situating action research in teacher education, educators assume that authentic researcher experiences will help preservice teachers translate theory into practice, particularly when dealing with innovative instructional strategies (Kemmis 2010). Furthermore, Eklund (2014) proposed that action research could be a solution to preservice teachers' dilemma. Though teachers understand and see the logic of the research orientation, they feel that research-based teacher education does not give them enough practical tools.All first-person references in this article refer to Nicolina, as I was the practitioner in this study. When drawing conclusions and implications, all three authors' voices will be heard. Jan-Erik and Ben, the silent coauthors in this paper, were experienced university faculty members who have expertise in the use of SE and action research, respectively. JanErik was the master's thesis supervisor, and we constructed the SE unit, discussed data collection, analysed the data, and discussed the findings together. He also challenged my understanding of the whole process. Ben provided an outside audit, giving peer debriefings and acting as a critical friend in order to challenge my interpretations of the student-teacher experience.Action ResearchBy definition, action research is when practitioners systematically investigate their own practice, to understand and improve it (Huang 2010; McNiff & Whitehead 2006). Besides developing and changing the practice, practitioners use action research to understand the change process (Newby 2010). Action research has been implemented in several ways, and one general feature is an approach where new knowledge is generated through changeoriented activities (Kalliola 2009). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Action Research
International Journal of Action Research Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信