利用风险管理工具提高化疗过程的安全性

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
A. Ouasrhir, Z. Bourhaleb, R. Rahhali, N. Boukhatem
{"title":"利用风险管理工具提高化疗过程的安全性","authors":"A. Ouasrhir, Z. Bourhaleb, R. Rahhali, N. Boukhatem","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Chemotherapy compounding is a main step of chemotherapy cancer process. This step is formed by many parts. A multidisciplinary team is assembled to define critical points and failures linked to this process and proposed different actions to secure them and improve chemotherapy cancer process. Methodology: By a prospective analysis risks tool: the failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA), anticancer drug process compounding was sequenced in many parts. During the brainstorming, different ideas expressed and were classified into an Ishikawa cause–effect diagram. The criticality indexes (CI) are calculated from occurrence, severity, and the detection probability. Results: The sum of CIs of 18 identified failure modes was CI=3607 for the decentralized system and CI=726 after the new organization of compounding process. The chemotherapy production step represents 37.17% (CI=1341) of all failures in the old process. The greatest risk reductions between the old and the new process concerned the risk of ‘Double check missing before delivery to the ward’ by a factor reduction of 28.0). Among the CIs remaining superior to 100, there was one failure: ‘Typing error during prescription’ (CI=144). Conclusion: Modification of the chemotherapy-compounding process by centralization, training program, and implementation of procedures resulted in an important risk reduction as shownby risk analysis.Our study illustrates the usefulness of risk analysismethods in the healthcare system. A systematic use of risk analysis is needed to improve the safety of high-risk activities in healthcare processes.","PeriodicalId":39134,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the safety of chemotherapy process by a risks management tool\",\"authors\":\"A. Ouasrhir, Z. Bourhaleb, R. Rahhali, N. Boukhatem\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Chemotherapy compounding is a main step of chemotherapy cancer process. This step is formed by many parts. A multidisciplinary team is assembled to define critical points and failures linked to this process and proposed different actions to secure them and improve chemotherapy cancer process. Methodology: By a prospective analysis risks tool: the failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA), anticancer drug process compounding was sequenced in many parts. During the brainstorming, different ideas expressed and were classified into an Ishikawa cause–effect diagram. The criticality indexes (CI) are calculated from occurrence, severity, and the detection probability. Results: The sum of CIs of 18 identified failure modes was CI=3607 for the decentralized system and CI=726 after the new organization of compounding process. The chemotherapy production step represents 37.17% (CI=1341) of all failures in the old process. The greatest risk reductions between the old and the new process concerned the risk of ‘Double check missing before delivery to the ward’ by a factor reduction of 28.0). Among the CIs remaining superior to 100, there was one failure: ‘Typing error during prescription’ (CI=144). Conclusion: Modification of the chemotherapy-compounding process by centralization, training program, and implementation of procedures resulted in an important risk reduction as shownby risk analysis.Our study illustrates the usefulness of risk analysismethods in the healthcare system. A systematic use of risk analysis is needed to improve the safety of high-risk activities in healthcare processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:复合化疗是癌症化疗过程中的一个重要环节。这个台阶由许多部分组成。组建了一个多学科团队,以确定与这一过程相关的关键点和失败,并提出不同的行动来确保这些关键点和成功,并改进癌症化疗过程。方法:通过前瞻性风险分析工具:失效模式、影响和关键性分析(FMECA),对抗癌药物的工艺组合进行了多个部分的排序。在头脑风暴中,不同的想法被表达出来,并被分类到石川因果图中。临界指数(CI)是根据发生、严重程度和检测概率来计算的。结果:对于分散系统,18种已识别故障模式的CI之和为CI=3607,在新的复合过程组织后为CI=726。化疗生产步骤占旧工艺中所有失败的37.17%(CI=1341)。新旧流程之间最大的风险降低涉及“送至病房前复查丢失”的风险,降低了28.0)。在仍高于100的CI中,有一个失败:“处方期间键入错误”(CI=144)。结论:如风险分析所示,通过集中化、培训计划和实施程序来修改化疗配合过程,可以显著降低风险。我们的研究说明了风险分析方法在医疗系统中的有用性。需要系统地使用风险分析来提高医疗保健过程中高风险活动的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the safety of chemotherapy process by a risks management tool
Objectives: Chemotherapy compounding is a main step of chemotherapy cancer process. This step is formed by many parts. A multidisciplinary team is assembled to define critical points and failures linked to this process and proposed different actions to secure them and improve chemotherapy cancer process. Methodology: By a prospective analysis risks tool: the failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA), anticancer drug process compounding was sequenced in many parts. During the brainstorming, different ideas expressed and were classified into an Ishikawa cause–effect diagram. The criticality indexes (CI) are calculated from occurrence, severity, and the detection probability. Results: The sum of CIs of 18 identified failure modes was CI=3607 for the decentralized system and CI=726 after the new organization of compounding process. The chemotherapy production step represents 37.17% (CI=1341) of all failures in the old process. The greatest risk reductions between the old and the new process concerned the risk of ‘Double check missing before delivery to the ward’ by a factor reduction of 28.0). Among the CIs remaining superior to 100, there was one failure: ‘Typing error during prescription’ (CI=144). Conclusion: Modification of the chemotherapy-compounding process by centralization, training program, and implementation of procedures resulted in an important risk reduction as shownby risk analysis.Our study illustrates the usefulness of risk analysismethods in the healthcare system. A systematic use of risk analysis is needed to improve the safety of high-risk activities in healthcare processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信