外科手部卫生新闻。本研究的目的是:

I. Mena-Gómez
{"title":"外科手部卫生新闻。本研究的目的是:","authors":"I. Mena-Gómez","doi":"10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hand hygiene for surgery is an essential clinical procedure whose technique has been evolving as the result of new scientific evidence. The related WHO manuals reflect the changes in this procedure; for example, the now non-binding need of using a brush. Nevertheless, it is necessary to continue analyzing the current evidence in order to recognize the new guidelines which are being established as the result of new published research. \nObjective: To carry out an updated literature review on hand hygiene for surgery. \nDevelopment: Hand washing for surgery using a brush has long been a regular practice in Mexican hospitals, however, there are diverse studies which support the omission of brushes due to the tissue damage which these utensils can cause - including dermal abrasions which can make the staff tend to brush their hands and arms for less time in comparison to the recommended standards, resulting in incomplete antiseptic effects. \nConclusions: Having in mind that some of the most recommended antiseptic substances are chlorhexidine and alcohol-based gels, hand hygiene for surgery without using a brush should be considered because it can reduce costs, guarantee hands decontamination, generate less dermal lesions, and contribute to the reduction of related surgical site infections.","PeriodicalId":33320,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Universitaria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actualidades en la higiene de manos quirúrgica. Revisión de la literatura\",\"authors\":\"I. Mena-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Hand hygiene for surgery is an essential clinical procedure whose technique has been evolving as the result of new scientific evidence. The related WHO manuals reflect the changes in this procedure; for example, the now non-binding need of using a brush. Nevertheless, it is necessary to continue analyzing the current evidence in order to recognize the new guidelines which are being established as the result of new published research. \\nObjective: To carry out an updated literature review on hand hygiene for surgery. \\nDevelopment: Hand washing for surgery using a brush has long been a regular practice in Mexican hospitals, however, there are diverse studies which support the omission of brushes due to the tissue damage which these utensils can cause - including dermal abrasions which can make the staff tend to brush their hands and arms for less time in comparison to the recommended standards, resulting in incomplete antiseptic effects. \\nConclusions: Having in mind that some of the most recommended antiseptic substances are chlorhexidine and alcohol-based gels, hand hygiene for surgery without using a brush should be considered because it can reduce costs, guarantee hands decontamination, generate less dermal lesions, and contribute to the reduction of related surgical site infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Universitaria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Universitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Universitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

手术手卫生是一项重要的临床程序,其技术随着新的科学证据而不断发展。世卫组织相关手册反映了这一程序的变化;例如,现在不需要使用画笔。然而,有必要继续分析目前的证据,以便认识到作为新发表的研究结果正在制定的新指南。目的:对外科手卫生进行最新的文献综述。发展:在墨西哥医院,用刷子进行手术洗手一直是一种常规做法,然而,有各种研究支持不使用刷子,因为这些器具可能造成组织损伤,包括皮肤磨损,这可能使工作人员倾向于刷手和手臂的时间少于推荐的标准,导致消毒效果不完全。结论:考虑到一些最推荐的抗菌物质是氯己定和酒精凝胶,不使用刷子进行手术时应考虑手卫生,因为它可以降低成本,保证手去污,产生较少的皮肤损伤,并有助于减少相关手术部位感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actualidades en la higiene de manos quirúrgica. Revisión de la literatura
Introduction: Hand hygiene for surgery is an essential clinical procedure whose technique has been evolving as the result of new scientific evidence. The related WHO manuals reflect the changes in this procedure; for example, the now non-binding need of using a brush. Nevertheless, it is necessary to continue analyzing the current evidence in order to recognize the new guidelines which are being established as the result of new published research. Objective: To carry out an updated literature review on hand hygiene for surgery. Development: Hand washing for surgery using a brush has long been a regular practice in Mexican hospitals, however, there are diverse studies which support the omission of brushes due to the tissue damage which these utensils can cause - including dermal abrasions which can make the staff tend to brush their hands and arms for less time in comparison to the recommended standards, resulting in incomplete antiseptic effects. Conclusions: Having in mind that some of the most recommended antiseptic substances are chlorhexidine and alcohol-based gels, hand hygiene for surgery without using a brush should be considered because it can reduce costs, guarantee hands decontamination, generate less dermal lesions, and contribute to the reduction of related surgical site infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信