赤手杀牛:Ukweshwama和Zulu文化的融合

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
L. Cordeiro‐Rodrigues
{"title":"赤手杀牛:Ukweshwama和Zulu文化的融合","authors":"L. Cordeiro‐Rodrigues","doi":"10.5252/anthropozoologica2018v53a16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A new trend in political theory is to question whether cultural practices clash with moral concerns about animal welfare. On the one hand, there is widespread concern to protect cultural distinctiveness; on the other, cultural distinctiveness may mean treating animals in cruel ways. In this article, I articulate this debate using the case of the killing of a bull in the Ukweshwama practice from South Africa. By engaging with the literature on multiculturalism, I question whether Zulus in South Africa are entitled or not to practice the killing of a bull during Ukweshwama. I respond to this question affirmatively, by defending that for reasons of autonomy, moral loss and legal consistency, Zulus are entitled to continue their practice.","PeriodicalId":38558,"journal":{"name":"Anthropozoologica","volume":"53 1","pages":"187 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Killing a bull with bare hands: Ukweshwama and Zulu cultural accommodation\",\"authors\":\"L. Cordeiro‐Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.5252/anthropozoologica2018v53a16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A new trend in political theory is to question whether cultural practices clash with moral concerns about animal welfare. On the one hand, there is widespread concern to protect cultural distinctiveness; on the other, cultural distinctiveness may mean treating animals in cruel ways. In this article, I articulate this debate using the case of the killing of a bull in the Ukweshwama practice from South Africa. By engaging with the literature on multiculturalism, I question whether Zulus in South Africa are entitled or not to practice the killing of a bull during Ukweshwama. I respond to this question affirmatively, by defending that for reasons of autonomy, moral loss and legal consistency, Zulus are entitled to continue their practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropozoologica\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropozoologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2018v53a16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropozoologica","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2018v53a16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治理论的一个新趋势是质疑文化实践是否与有关动物福利的道德关切相冲突。一方面,人们普遍关注保护文化独特性;另一方面,文化独特性可能意味着以残忍的方式对待动物。在这篇文章中,我用南非的Ukweshwama实践中杀死公牛的案例来阐明这一争论。通过研究有关多元文化主义的文献,我质疑南非的祖鲁人是否有资格在Ukweshwama期间杀牛。我对这个问题的回答是肯定的,我为祖鲁人辩护说,出于自治、道德丧失和法律一致性的原因,祖鲁人有权继续他们的习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Killing a bull with bare hands: Ukweshwama and Zulu cultural accommodation
ABSTRACT A new trend in political theory is to question whether cultural practices clash with moral concerns about animal welfare. On the one hand, there is widespread concern to protect cultural distinctiveness; on the other, cultural distinctiveness may mean treating animals in cruel ways. In this article, I articulate this debate using the case of the killing of a bull in the Ukweshwama practice from South Africa. By engaging with the literature on multiculturalism, I question whether Zulus in South Africa are entitled or not to practice the killing of a bull during Ukweshwama. I respond to this question affirmatively, by defending that for reasons of autonomy, moral loss and legal consistency, Zulus are entitled to continue their practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropozoologica
Anthropozoologica Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信