BLACKBALLING BUCKLER:约翰·巴克勒(1770–1851)的信件、卡特学派和古董王朝的基础

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Mardell
{"title":"BLACKBALLING BUCKLER:约翰·巴克勒(1770–1851)的信件、卡特学派和古董王朝的基础","authors":"J. Mardell","doi":"10.1017/S0003581522000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the story, hitherto neglected by scholarship, of the antiquarian artist and architect John Buckler (1770–1851) through a remarkable cache of his letters at the Bodleian Library. Most of the letters relate to Buckler’s attempts to be elected a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries. Having twice been blackballed in 1808 and 1809, he canvassed Britain’s leading antiquarian figures for support. With the blackballing of the architect James Wyatt in 1797 frequently alluded to, Buckler’s blackballing was the result of a cabal against him led by Sir Joseph Banks and Samuel Lysons, which had to do with both factionalism – ie his closeness to the preservationist faction led by Richard Gough and John Carter, termed the Carter school – and the Society’s onslaught against professionals. His eventual success in 1810 institutionalised his practice, allowed him entry into polite society and brought him closer to aristocratic patronage. The remainder of the Bodleian letters relate to Buckler’s topographical work recording medieval buildings across the UK, showing how he took on the revisionist medievalist project promoted by the Carter school. The article will explain Buckler’s role in the developing discourses of antiquarianism and the Gothic Revival, and how his association with the Carter school laid the foundations for the work of the Buckler dynasty. Over three generations, in line with the family name (meaning ‘to protect’), they sought to embody the idea of the architect-antiquary as a protector.","PeriodicalId":44308,"journal":{"name":"Antiquaries Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"418 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BLACKBALLING BUCKLER: THE LETTERS OF JOHN BUCKLER (1770–1851), THE CARTER SCHOOL AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF AN ANTIQUARIAN DYNASTY\",\"authors\":\"J. Mardell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0003581522000038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the story, hitherto neglected by scholarship, of the antiquarian artist and architect John Buckler (1770–1851) through a remarkable cache of his letters at the Bodleian Library. Most of the letters relate to Buckler’s attempts to be elected a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries. Having twice been blackballed in 1808 and 1809, he canvassed Britain’s leading antiquarian figures for support. With the blackballing of the architect James Wyatt in 1797 frequently alluded to, Buckler’s blackballing was the result of a cabal against him led by Sir Joseph Banks and Samuel Lysons, which had to do with both factionalism – ie his closeness to the preservationist faction led by Richard Gough and John Carter, termed the Carter school – and the Society’s onslaught against professionals. His eventual success in 1810 institutionalised his practice, allowed him entry into polite society and brought him closer to aristocratic patronage. The remainder of the Bodleian letters relate to Buckler’s topographical work recording medieval buildings across the UK, showing how he took on the revisionist medievalist project promoted by the Carter school. The article will explain Buckler’s role in the developing discourses of antiquarianism and the Gothic Revival, and how his association with the Carter school laid the foundations for the work of the Buckler dynasty. Over three generations, in line with the family name (meaning ‘to protect’), they sought to embody the idea of the architect-antiquary as a protector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"418 - 446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquaries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581522000038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquaries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581522000038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过博德利图书馆收藏的一批著名的古董艺术家兼建筑师约翰·巴克勒(John Buckler,1770–1851)的信件,探讨了迄今为止被学术界忽视的故事。大多数信件都与巴克勒试图当选为古董协会会员有关。在1808年和1809年两次遭到反对后,他游说英国顶尖的古董学家支持。1797年,建筑师詹姆斯·怀亚特(James Wyatt)经常被提及对巴克勒的反对,巴克勒的抵制是由约瑟夫·班克斯爵士(Sir Joseph Banks)和塞缪尔·莱森(Samuel Lysons)领导的反对他的阴谋集团的结果,这既与派系斗争有关,也与他与理查德·高夫(Richard Gough)和约翰·卡特(John Carter)领导的被称为卡特学派的保护主义派系的亲密关系有关,以及协会对专业人士的攻击有关。他在1810年的最终成功使他的实践制度化,使他进入了上流社会,并使他更接近贵族的庇护。博德利信件的其余部分与巴克勒记录英国中世纪建筑的地形工作有关,展示了他是如何接受卡特学派推动的修正主义中世纪主义项目的。本文将解释巴克勒在古物主义和哥特式复兴话语发展中的作用,以及他与卡特学派的联系如何为巴克勒王朝的工作奠定基础。在三代人的时间里,根据姓氏(意思是“保护”),他们试图体现建筑师古董作为保护人的理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BLACKBALLING BUCKLER: THE LETTERS OF JOHN BUCKLER (1770–1851), THE CARTER SCHOOL AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF AN ANTIQUARIAN DYNASTY
This paper examines the story, hitherto neglected by scholarship, of the antiquarian artist and architect John Buckler (1770–1851) through a remarkable cache of his letters at the Bodleian Library. Most of the letters relate to Buckler’s attempts to be elected a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries. Having twice been blackballed in 1808 and 1809, he canvassed Britain’s leading antiquarian figures for support. With the blackballing of the architect James Wyatt in 1797 frequently alluded to, Buckler’s blackballing was the result of a cabal against him led by Sir Joseph Banks and Samuel Lysons, which had to do with both factionalism – ie his closeness to the preservationist faction led by Richard Gough and John Carter, termed the Carter school – and the Society’s onslaught against professionals. His eventual success in 1810 institutionalised his practice, allowed him entry into polite society and brought him closer to aristocratic patronage. The remainder of the Bodleian letters relate to Buckler’s topographical work recording medieval buildings across the UK, showing how he took on the revisionist medievalist project promoted by the Carter school. The article will explain Buckler’s role in the developing discourses of antiquarianism and the Gothic Revival, and how his association with the Carter school laid the foundations for the work of the Buckler dynasty. Over three generations, in line with the family name (meaning ‘to protect’), they sought to embody the idea of the architect-antiquary as a protector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antiquaries Journal
Antiquaries Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信