听众设计的限制:马耳他语的外音声门停顿

IF 1.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Clive Sciberras, H. Mitterer
{"title":"听众设计的限制:马耳他语的外音声门停顿","authors":"Clive Sciberras, H. Mitterer","doi":"10.16995/labphon.6441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many languages tend to mark vowel-initial words with a glottal stop in connected speech, especially when the word is in a prominent position (Garellek, 2014). This also happens in Maltese, even though the glottal stop here also occurs as a phoneme, so that the epenthetic glottal stop may significantly alter which other words the vowel-initial word is similar to. For the pair attur /ɑtːur/ versus qattus /ʔɑtːus/ (Engl. ‘actor’ vs. ‘cat), adding an epenthetic glottal stop to the vowel-initial renders the two words more similar. This provides an interesting test bed for the hypothesis of audience design. If speakers want to highlight the contrast between the two words, they should, in contrast to what usually happens when a word is prominent, not produce an epenthetic glottal stop. We tested this is in a production experiment and found that speakers instead produce much more glottal stops for such vowel-initial words under a phonological contrast compared with an unaccented version, and even slightly more than when under a lexical contrast (e.g., actor vs. theatre). Our results provide an example of a limitation of audience design.","PeriodicalId":45128,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Phonology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits of audience design: Epenthetic glottal stops in Maltese\",\"authors\":\"Clive Sciberras, H. Mitterer\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/labphon.6441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many languages tend to mark vowel-initial words with a glottal stop in connected speech, especially when the word is in a prominent position (Garellek, 2014). This also happens in Maltese, even though the glottal stop here also occurs as a phoneme, so that the epenthetic glottal stop may significantly alter which other words the vowel-initial word is similar to. For the pair attur /ɑtːur/ versus qattus /ʔɑtːus/ (Engl. ‘actor’ vs. ‘cat), adding an epenthetic glottal stop to the vowel-initial renders the two words more similar. This provides an interesting test bed for the hypothesis of audience design. If speakers want to highlight the contrast between the two words, they should, in contrast to what usually happens when a word is prominent, not produce an epenthetic glottal stop. We tested this is in a production experiment and found that speakers instead produce much more glottal stops for such vowel-initial words under a phonological contrast compared with an unaccented version, and even slightly more than when under a lexical contrast (e.g., actor vs. theatre). Our results provide an example of a limitation of audience design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory Phonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory Phonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多语言倾向于在连接语音中用声门顿音标记元音开头的单词,特别是当单词处于突出位置时(Garellek, 2014)。这在马耳他语中也会发生,尽管这里的声门塞音也是作为音素出现的,所以辅音的声门塞音可能会显著地改变元音开头的单词与其他单词的相似程度。对于这对夫妇来说,attur / æ t / ur/ vs . qattus / æ t / us/(英语。“演员”和“猫”),在元音的首字母后面加上一个外音的声门顿音,使这两个词更加相似。这为受众设计假说提供了一个有趣的测试平台。如果说话者想要强调两个单词之间的对比,他们应该,与通常一个单词突出时不同,不要产生一个外音的声门顿音。我们在一个生产实验中测试了这一点,发现说话者在语音对比下比在非重音版本中对这些元音开头的单词发出更多的声门顿音,甚至比在词汇对比下(例如,演员和剧院)发出更多的声门顿音。我们的结果提供了用户设计局限性的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limits of audience design: Epenthetic glottal stops in Maltese
Many languages tend to mark vowel-initial words with a glottal stop in connected speech, especially when the word is in a prominent position (Garellek, 2014). This also happens in Maltese, even though the glottal stop here also occurs as a phoneme, so that the epenthetic glottal stop may significantly alter which other words the vowel-initial word is similar to. For the pair attur /ɑtːur/ versus qattus /ʔɑtːus/ (Engl. ‘actor’ vs. ‘cat), adding an epenthetic glottal stop to the vowel-initial renders the two words more similar. This provides an interesting test bed for the hypothesis of audience design. If speakers want to highlight the contrast between the two words, they should, in contrast to what usually happens when a word is prominent, not produce an epenthetic glottal stop. We tested this is in a production experiment and found that speakers instead produce much more glottal stops for such vowel-initial words under a phonological contrast compared with an unaccented version, and even slightly more than when under a lexical contrast (e.g., actor vs. theatre). Our results provide an example of a limitation of audience design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信