国际护士监管机构合作流动项目:跨司法管辖区流动——可能吗?

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Alison Roots BSN, MHS M, PhD, RN
{"title":"国际护士监管机构合作流动项目:跨司法管辖区流动——可能吗?","authors":"Alison Roots BSN, MHS M, PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00034-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current global environment has led to increased mobility of nurses—and increasing pressure from governments to recruit more nurses into their workforces.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore whether transjurisdictional mobility was possible, members of the International Nurse Regulator Collaborative (INRC) participated in research to investigate the possibility of recognizing existing licensure or registration and thereby reducing barriers and allowing for more streamlined mobility between INRC jurisdictions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a mixed methods, multi-phased, multiple-case study design, regulatory processes and practices were investigated in each jurisdiction; findings were then compared across eight participating jurisdictions. Three research phases moved from a high-level jurisdictional overview, through expected standards underpinning nursing practice, to specific operational processes and outcomes. Issues and challenges in licensing/registering transjurisdictional INRC applicants were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A high level of consistency was found in the expectations, standards, and operational processes across jurisdictions. Challenges existed in relation to requirements for and assessments of educational qualifications despite entry to practice competencies and educational program approval requirements being largely the same. Jurisdictional regulators worked under different legislative frameworks, which may potentially create different challenges and timelines for moving toward transjurisdictional mobility. Balancing mobility with the core regulatory responsibility of maintaining public safety will be a key challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Transjurisdictional mobility could potentially exist between jurisdictions with common regulatory principles, processes, and standards. Applicants moving between these jurisdictions present low risk. Streamlining processes could reduce regulatory workload while maintaining safety to the public.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The International Nurse Regulator Collaborative Mobility Project: Transjurisdictional Mobility—Is It Possible?\",\"authors\":\"Alison Roots BSN, MHS M, PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00034-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current global environment has led to increased mobility of nurses—and increasing pressure from governments to recruit more nurses into their workforces.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore whether transjurisdictional mobility was possible, members of the International Nurse Regulator Collaborative (INRC) participated in research to investigate the possibility of recognizing existing licensure or registration and thereby reducing barriers and allowing for more streamlined mobility between INRC jurisdictions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a mixed methods, multi-phased, multiple-case study design, regulatory processes and practices were investigated in each jurisdiction; findings were then compared across eight participating jurisdictions. Three research phases moved from a high-level jurisdictional overview, through expected standards underpinning nursing practice, to specific operational processes and outcomes. Issues and challenges in licensing/registering transjurisdictional INRC applicants were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A high level of consistency was found in the expectations, standards, and operational processes across jurisdictions. Challenges existed in relation to requirements for and assessments of educational qualifications despite entry to practice competencies and educational program approval requirements being largely the same. Jurisdictional regulators worked under different legislative frameworks, which may potentially create different challenges and timelines for moving toward transjurisdictional mobility. Balancing mobility with the core regulatory responsibility of maintaining public safety will be a key challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Transjurisdictional mobility could potentially exist between jurisdictions with common regulatory principles, processes, and standards. Applicants moving between these jurisdictions present low risk. Streamlining processes could reduce regulatory workload while maintaining safety to the public.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825623000340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825623000340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的全球环境导致护士的流动性增加,政府要求招聘更多护士的压力也越来越大。目的:为了探讨跨辖区流动是否可能,国际护士监管合作组织(INRC)的成员参与了一项研究,以调查承认现有执照或注册的可能性,从而减少障碍,并允许在INRC辖区之间更精简的流动。方法采用混合方法、多阶段、多案例研究设计、监管流程和实践进行调查;然后比较了八个参与调查的司法管辖区的调查结果。三个研究阶段从高级管辖概述,通过支持护理实践的预期标准,到具体的操作流程和结果。报告指出了跨司法管辖区INRC申请人发牌/注册方面的问题和挑战。结果各司法管辖区的期望、标准和操作流程高度一致。尽管进入实践能力和教育计划批准要求在很大程度上是相同的,但与教育资格的要求和评估有关的挑战仍然存在。司法管辖区的监管机构在不同的立法框架下工作,这可能会给跨司法管辖区的流动性带来不同的挑战和时间表。平衡流动性与维护公共安全的核心监管责任将是一项关键挑战。结论具有共同监管原则、流程和标准的司法管辖区之间可能存在跨司法管辖区流动性。申请人在这些司法管辖区之间流动的风险较低。简化流程可以减少监管工作量,同时保持公众安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The International Nurse Regulator Collaborative Mobility Project: Transjurisdictional Mobility—Is It Possible?

Background

The current global environment has led to increased mobility of nurses—and increasing pressure from governments to recruit more nurses into their workforces.

Purpose

To explore whether transjurisdictional mobility was possible, members of the International Nurse Regulator Collaborative (INRC) participated in research to investigate the possibility of recognizing existing licensure or registration and thereby reducing barriers and allowing for more streamlined mobility between INRC jurisdictions.

Methods

Using a mixed methods, multi-phased, multiple-case study design, regulatory processes and practices were investigated in each jurisdiction; findings were then compared across eight participating jurisdictions. Three research phases moved from a high-level jurisdictional overview, through expected standards underpinning nursing practice, to specific operational processes and outcomes. Issues and challenges in licensing/registering transjurisdictional INRC applicants were identified.

Results

A high level of consistency was found in the expectations, standards, and operational processes across jurisdictions. Challenges existed in relation to requirements for and assessments of educational qualifications despite entry to practice competencies and educational program approval requirements being largely the same. Jurisdictional regulators worked under different legislative frameworks, which may potentially create different challenges and timelines for moving toward transjurisdictional mobility. Balancing mobility with the core regulatory responsibility of maintaining public safety will be a key challenge.

Conclusion

Transjurisdictional mobility could potentially exist between jurisdictions with common regulatory principles, processes, and standards. Applicants moving between these jurisdictions present low risk. Streamlining processes could reduce regulatory workload while maintaining safety to the public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信