亲密技术:技术科学地理学的女性主义视角

IF 6.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
C. Schurr, Nadine Marquardt, Elisabeth Militz
{"title":"亲密技术:技术科学地理学的女性主义视角","authors":"C. Schurr, Nadine Marquardt, Elisabeth Militz","doi":"10.1177/03091325231151673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technologies are at the heart of geographic analysis. More-than-human geographies, actor-network theory, and new materialism have all called for attending to technological infrastructures and artefacts. This attention is directed mainly towards large-scale technologies. What often escapes geographies of technoscience are small, mundane, and unspectacular technologies. Bringing into conversation work from feminist technoscience and feminist geographies, we broaden the understanding of technology in geographies of technoscience by developing the concept of intimate technologies. By exploring three sites that lie at the centre of feminist technoscience – the home, the laboratory, and the clinic – we carve out the spatial politics of intimate technologies.","PeriodicalId":48403,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Human Geography","volume":"47 1","pages":"215 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intimate technologies: Towards a feminist perspective on geographies of technoscience\",\"authors\":\"C. Schurr, Nadine Marquardt, Elisabeth Militz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03091325231151673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technologies are at the heart of geographic analysis. More-than-human geographies, actor-network theory, and new materialism have all called for attending to technological infrastructures and artefacts. This attention is directed mainly towards large-scale technologies. What often escapes geographies of technoscience are small, mundane, and unspectacular technologies. Bringing into conversation work from feminist technoscience and feminist geographies, we broaden the understanding of technology in geographies of technoscience by developing the concept of intimate technologies. By exploring three sites that lie at the centre of feminist technoscience – the home, the laboratory, and the clinic – we carve out the spatial politics of intimate technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231151673\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231151673","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

技术是地理分析的核心。超越人类的地理学、行动者网络理论和新唯物主义都呼吁关注技术基础设施和人工制品。这种关注主要针对大规模技术。在技术科学的地理研究中,经常漏掉的是那些不起眼的、平凡的、不引人注目的技术。引入女性主义技术科学和女性主义地理学的对话工作,我们通过发展亲密技术的概念,拓宽了对技术科学地理学中技术的理解。通过探索位于女性主义技术科学中心的三个场所——家、实验室和诊所——我们勾勒出亲密技术的空间政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intimate technologies: Towards a feminist perspective on geographies of technoscience
Technologies are at the heart of geographic analysis. More-than-human geographies, actor-network theory, and new materialism have all called for attending to technological infrastructures and artefacts. This attention is directed mainly towards large-scale technologies. What often escapes geographies of technoscience are small, mundane, and unspectacular technologies. Bringing into conversation work from feminist technoscience and feminist geographies, we broaden the understanding of technology in geographies of technoscience by developing the concept of intimate technologies. By exploring three sites that lie at the centre of feminist technoscience – the home, the laboratory, and the clinic – we carve out the spatial politics of intimate technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
7.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Progress in Human Geography is the peer-review journal of choice for those wanting to know about the state of the art in all areas of research in the field of human geography - philosophical, theoretical, thematic, methodological or empirical. Concerned primarily with critical reviews of current research, PiHG enables a space for debate about questions, concepts and findings of formative influence in human geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信