儿童和年轻人的症状性行动过度:使用发育框架对临床特征的范围界定综述

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
S. Ward, E. Macdermott, J. Simmonds, J. Deane, D. Mockler, S. Dockrell
{"title":"儿童和年轻人的症状性行动过度:使用发育框架对临床特征的范围界定综述","authors":"S. Ward, E. Macdermott, J. Simmonds, J. Deane, D. Mockler, S. Dockrell","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature on children and young people with symptomatic hypermobility using a developmental framework. METHODS: A search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and grey literature. Full text articles reporting children and young people (birth to 24 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic hypermobility, (including Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder or hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome) using internationally recognised criteria or equivalent diagnoses were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was followed. RESULTS: Of the 1619 studies screened, 163 were included in the scoping review. Studies were published from 1967-2021, 30% were narrative reviews and 24% were case reports, from a range of journals. Musculoskeletal and cutaneous characteristics were common in all developmental stages. Cardiovascular characteristics including autonomic dysfunction, fatigue, and gastrointestinal issues were reported more frequently by adolescents. Young adult studies were scarce and included mostly case reports. Varied diagnostic criteria and assessment methods were identified. The Beighton Score was frequently used (93%), but rarely standardised (12%) and lacked consensus regarding the cut-off point of hypermobility. CONCLUSIONS: This novel systematic scoping review identifies the changing phenotype of symptomatic hypermobility from childhood to adolescence, and the unique stage of young adulthood. There is a lack of guidance regarding the utilisation of standardised tools to assess hypermobility in clinical practice and research. Numerous and inconsistent diagnostic criteria and assessment methods limit the data analysis. Case control and longitudinal studies using defined, bespoke criteria and assessments are needed.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptomatic hypermobility in children and young people: A scoping review of clinical characteristics using a developmental framework\",\"authors\":\"S. Ward, E. Macdermott, J. Simmonds, J. Deane, D. Mockler, S. Dockrell\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ppr-220699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature on children and young people with symptomatic hypermobility using a developmental framework. METHODS: A search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and grey literature. Full text articles reporting children and young people (birth to 24 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic hypermobility, (including Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder or hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome) using internationally recognised criteria or equivalent diagnoses were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was followed. RESULTS: Of the 1619 studies screened, 163 were included in the scoping review. Studies were published from 1967-2021, 30% were narrative reviews and 24% were case reports, from a range of journals. Musculoskeletal and cutaneous characteristics were common in all developmental stages. Cardiovascular characteristics including autonomic dysfunction, fatigue, and gastrointestinal issues were reported more frequently by adolescents. Young adult studies were scarce and included mostly case reports. Varied diagnostic criteria and assessment methods were identified. The Beighton Score was frequently used (93%), but rarely standardised (12%) and lacked consensus regarding the cut-off point of hypermobility. CONCLUSIONS: This novel systematic scoping review identifies the changing phenotype of symptomatic hypermobility from childhood to adolescence, and the unique stage of young adulthood. There is a lack of guidance regarding the utilisation of standardised tools to assess hypermobility in clinical practice and research. Numerous and inconsistent diagnostic criteria and assessment methods limit the data analysis. Case control and longitudinal studies using defined, bespoke criteria and assessments are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用发展框架评估有关儿童和年轻人症状性高活动能力的文献。方法:检索EMBASE、Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science和灰色文献。包括使用国际公认标准或同等诊断确诊为症状性行动过度(包括行动过度谱系障碍或行动过度埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征)的儿童和年轻人(出生至24岁)的全文文章。遵循系统评价的首选报告项目和范围界定评价方法的Meta分析扩展。结果:在筛选的1619项研究中,163项被纳入范围界定审查。研究发表于1967-2021年,30%是叙述性综述,24%是来自一系列期刊的病例报告。肌肉骨骼和皮肤特征在所有发育阶段都很常见。青少年报告的心血管特征包括自主神经功能障碍、疲劳和胃肠道问题的频率更高。年轻人的研究很少,主要包括病例报告。确定了不同的诊断标准和评估方法。Beighton评分经常被使用(93%),但很少被标准化(12%),并且对过度活动的临界点缺乏共识。结论:这篇新的系统范围综述确定了从儿童期到青春期症状性高移动性的变化表型,以及青年期的独特阶段。在临床实践和研究中,缺乏关于使用标准化工具评估高机动性的指导。大量且不一致的诊断标准和评估方法限制了数据分析。需要使用定义的、定制的标准和评估进行病例控制和纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptomatic hypermobility in children and young people: A scoping review of clinical characteristics using a developmental framework
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature on children and young people with symptomatic hypermobility using a developmental framework. METHODS: A search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and grey literature. Full text articles reporting children and young people (birth to 24 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic hypermobility, (including Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder or hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome) using internationally recognised criteria or equivalent diagnoses were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was followed. RESULTS: Of the 1619 studies screened, 163 were included in the scoping review. Studies were published from 1967-2021, 30% were narrative reviews and 24% were case reports, from a range of journals. Musculoskeletal and cutaneous characteristics were common in all developmental stages. Cardiovascular characteristics including autonomic dysfunction, fatigue, and gastrointestinal issues were reported more frequently by adolescents. Young adult studies were scarce and included mostly case reports. Varied diagnostic criteria and assessment methods were identified. The Beighton Score was frequently used (93%), but rarely standardised (12%) and lacked consensus regarding the cut-off point of hypermobility. CONCLUSIONS: This novel systematic scoping review identifies the changing phenotype of symptomatic hypermobility from childhood to adolescence, and the unique stage of young adulthood. There is a lack of guidance regarding the utilisation of standardised tools to assess hypermobility in clinical practice and research. Numerous and inconsistent diagnostic criteria and assessment methods limit the data analysis. Case control and longitudinal studies using defined, bespoke criteria and assessments are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信