{"title":"改革法国文化。乔治·霍夫曼的讽刺、精神异化和与陌生人的联系","authors":"B. Renner","doi":"10.1353/frf.2021.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 skips ahead to the Cold War and Paul Éluard, who, despite being a prominent Surrealist, eventually joined the Stalin cult. He wrote and narrated the film L’homme que nous aimons le plus, a flattering birthday celebration of the dictator. Readers should beware that Stalin was no friend of Surrealism. The First International Writers Conference in Paris in 1935 had banned the Surrealists, whom Communists had long considered pornographers and sexual perverts. The only Surrealist to be admitted to the Communist Parnasse was Aragon, who made amends for his Surrealist deviations early in his career, publicly embracing Stalin and becoming a pillar of Communist orthodoxy in France for decades to come. He is the subject of the fourth and last chapter, on Aragon’s unfinished roman fleuve, Les Communistes (1949–1951, 1966). It shows the vagaries of Communist historiography by showing how important historical events are constantly reinterpreted according to the politically correct position. Aragon participated in every Communist coverup, but paradoxically, was also key to promoting deStalinization in France thanks to his fame. We already knew about the Stalin cult; what this highly readable and thoroughly researched book does is “reshape our understanding of how French writers supported Stalin, the USSR, and international communism” (33). Sobanet brings to life a time not long ago and makes numerous parallels with our time, which should give us pause. No country is immune from the personality cult, as the reigns of Xi Jinping, Putin, and Kim JongUn suggest.","PeriodicalId":42174,"journal":{"name":"FRENCH FORUM","volume":"46 1","pages":"299 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming French Culture. Satire, Spiritual Alienation, and Connection to Strangers by George Hoffmann (review)\",\"authors\":\"B. Renner\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/frf.2021.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 3 skips ahead to the Cold War and Paul Éluard, who, despite being a prominent Surrealist, eventually joined the Stalin cult. He wrote and narrated the film L’homme que nous aimons le plus, a flattering birthday celebration of the dictator. Readers should beware that Stalin was no friend of Surrealism. The First International Writers Conference in Paris in 1935 had banned the Surrealists, whom Communists had long considered pornographers and sexual perverts. The only Surrealist to be admitted to the Communist Parnasse was Aragon, who made amends for his Surrealist deviations early in his career, publicly embracing Stalin and becoming a pillar of Communist orthodoxy in France for decades to come. He is the subject of the fourth and last chapter, on Aragon’s unfinished roman fleuve, Les Communistes (1949–1951, 1966). It shows the vagaries of Communist historiography by showing how important historical events are constantly reinterpreted according to the politically correct position. Aragon participated in every Communist coverup, but paradoxically, was also key to promoting deStalinization in France thanks to his fame. We already knew about the Stalin cult; what this highly readable and thoroughly researched book does is “reshape our understanding of how French writers supported Stalin, the USSR, and international communism” (33). Sobanet brings to life a time not long ago and makes numerous parallels with our time, which should give us pause. No country is immune from the personality cult, as the reigns of Xi Jinping, Putin, and Kim JongUn suggest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FRENCH FORUM\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"299 - 301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FRENCH FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/frf.2021.0020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FRENCH FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/frf.2021.0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
第三章跳到冷战和保罗Éluard,他虽然是一个著名的超现实主义者,但最终加入了斯大林的崇拜。他撰写并解说了电影《我是一个人》(L 'homme que nous aimons le plus),这是一部颂扬独裁者生日的影片。读者应该注意,斯大林不是超现实主义的朋友。1935年在巴黎举行的第一届国际作家大会禁止了超现实主义者,共产党人一直认为他们是色情作品和性变态。唯一被共产主义帕纳斯宫接纳的超现实主义者是阿拉贡,他在职业生涯早期弥补了自己的超现实主义偏差,公开拥护斯大林,并在接下来的几十年里成为法国共产主义正统思想的支柱。他是第四章也是最后一章的主题,这一章是关于阿拉贡未完成的罗马歌剧《共产主义者》(1949-1951,1966)。通过展示重要的历史事件如何根据政治正确的立场不断被重新解释,它显示了共产主义史学的变幻莫测。阿拉贡参与了共产党的每一次掩盖行动,但矛盾的是,由于他的名声,他也是推动法国非殖民化的关键。我们已经知道对斯大林的崇拜;这本可读性强、研究深入的书“重塑了我们对法国作家如何支持斯大林、苏联和国际共产主义的理解”(33)。Sobanet将不久前的一段时间带入生活,并与我们的时代进行了许多相似之处,这应该让我们停下来。
Reforming French Culture. Satire, Spiritual Alienation, and Connection to Strangers by George Hoffmann (review)
Chapter 3 skips ahead to the Cold War and Paul Éluard, who, despite being a prominent Surrealist, eventually joined the Stalin cult. He wrote and narrated the film L’homme que nous aimons le plus, a flattering birthday celebration of the dictator. Readers should beware that Stalin was no friend of Surrealism. The First International Writers Conference in Paris in 1935 had banned the Surrealists, whom Communists had long considered pornographers and sexual perverts. The only Surrealist to be admitted to the Communist Parnasse was Aragon, who made amends for his Surrealist deviations early in his career, publicly embracing Stalin and becoming a pillar of Communist orthodoxy in France for decades to come. He is the subject of the fourth and last chapter, on Aragon’s unfinished roman fleuve, Les Communistes (1949–1951, 1966). It shows the vagaries of Communist historiography by showing how important historical events are constantly reinterpreted according to the politically correct position. Aragon participated in every Communist coverup, but paradoxically, was also key to promoting deStalinization in France thanks to his fame. We already knew about the Stalin cult; what this highly readable and thoroughly researched book does is “reshape our understanding of how French writers supported Stalin, the USSR, and international communism” (33). Sobanet brings to life a time not long ago and makes numerous parallels with our time, which should give us pause. No country is immune from the personality cult, as the reigns of Xi Jinping, Putin, and Kim JongUn suggest.
期刊介绍:
French Forum is a journal of French and Francophone literature and film. It publishes articles in English and French on all periods and genres in both disciplines and welcomes a multiplicity of approaches. Founded by Virginia and Raymond La Charité, French Forum is produced by the French section of the Department of Romance Languages at the University of Pennsylvania. All articles are peer reviewed by an editorial committee of external readers. The journal has a book review section, which highlights a selection of important new publications in the field.