职业和个人之间的模糊界限:教师在社交媒体上的行为规范

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sandra Noakes, Sarah Hook
{"title":"职业和个人之间的模糊界限:教师在社交媒体上的行为规范","authors":"Sandra Noakes, Sarah Hook","doi":"10.1177/0004944120924889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As demonstrated by recent media reports concerning the Australian Public Service Social Media Policy and the Australian Rugby Union’s dispute with Israel Folau, social media often blurs the line between our professional and personal lives, and means that employers want to control what we do and say on social media. This is an issue which directly affects Australian teachers, whose professional obligations have always extended beyond their immediate work environments. Does social media mean that teachers are never ‘off the clock’? This article examines the current law relating to control of teacher behaviour and comment on social media. It analyses the implied freedom of political communication discussed in the 2019 High Court decision of Comcare v Banerji, and its ramifications for teachers and their employers. Additionally, using case studies involving social media policies of authorities which control teacher professional conduct, it considers whether such policies constitute lawful and reasonable directions, or whether they could be challenged as infringing teachers’ rights to a personal life.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":"65 1","pages":"6 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0004944120924889","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The blurred line between the professional and the personal: Regulation of teacher behaviour on social media\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Noakes, Sarah Hook\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0004944120924889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As demonstrated by recent media reports concerning the Australian Public Service Social Media Policy and the Australian Rugby Union’s dispute with Israel Folau, social media often blurs the line between our professional and personal lives, and means that employers want to control what we do and say on social media. This is an issue which directly affects Australian teachers, whose professional obligations have always extended beyond their immediate work environments. Does social media mean that teachers are never ‘off the clock’? This article examines the current law relating to control of teacher behaviour and comment on social media. It analyses the implied freedom of political communication discussed in the 2019 High Court decision of Comcare v Banerji, and its ramifications for teachers and their employers. Additionally, using case studies involving social media policies of authorities which control teacher professional conduct, it considers whether such policies constitute lawful and reasonable directions, or whether they could be challenged as infringing teachers’ rights to a personal life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0004944120924889\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120924889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120924889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

正如最近关于澳大利亚公共服务社交媒体政策和澳大利亚橄榄球联盟与以色列福劳争端的媒体报道所表明的那样,社交媒体往往模糊了我们的职业生活和个人生活之间的界限,意味着雇主希望控制我们在社交媒体上的言行。这是一个直接影响澳大利亚教师的问题,他们的职业义务一直延伸到他们直接的工作环境之外。社交媒体是否意味着教师从不“下班”?本文探讨了有关控制教师行为和在社交媒体上发表评论的现行法律。它分析了2019年高等法院对Comcare诉Banerji一案的裁决中所讨论的隐含的政治沟通自由,及其对教师及其雇主的影响。此外,通过对控制教师职业行为的当局的社交媒体政策进行案例研究,它考虑了这些政策是否构成合法和合理的指示,或者是否可以被质疑为侵犯教师的个人生活权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The blurred line between the professional and the personal: Regulation of teacher behaviour on social media
As demonstrated by recent media reports concerning the Australian Public Service Social Media Policy and the Australian Rugby Union’s dispute with Israel Folau, social media often blurs the line between our professional and personal lives, and means that employers want to control what we do and say on social media. This is an issue which directly affects Australian teachers, whose professional obligations have always extended beyond their immediate work environments. Does social media mean that teachers are never ‘off the clock’? This article examines the current law relating to control of teacher behaviour and comment on social media. It analyses the implied freedom of political communication discussed in the 2019 High Court decision of Comcare v Banerji, and its ramifications for teachers and their employers. Additionally, using case studies involving social media policies of authorities which control teacher professional conduct, it considers whether such policies constitute lawful and reasonable directions, or whether they could be challenged as infringing teachers’ rights to a personal life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Education
Australian Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信