重力式旋涡涡轮机两种转轮的数值比较

Q2 Engineering
Alejandro Ruiz Sánchez, Angie Judith Guevara Muñoz, J. S. Río, José A. Montoya
{"title":"重力式旋涡涡轮机两种转轮的数值比较","authors":"Alejandro Ruiz Sánchez, Angie Judith Guevara Muñoz, J. S. Río, José A. Montoya","doi":"10.24423/ENGTRANS.1165.20210126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this study is to compare numerically the torque generated by two runners for a gravitational vortex turbine. One of the runners was an H-Darrieus turbine with the rotational flow into the chamber that helped to decrease its negative torque. The other runner was a standard (straight blade) turbine, which determined the performance in both cases. The study was conducted in ANSYSrCFX, where the model was configured at constant operating conditions in both cases. The standard runner performance was higher (75%) than that of the H-Darrieus runner. The highest torque for the standard and the H-Darrieus runners was 0.76 and 0.16 N·m, respectively. The standard runner had a larger fluid contact area than the H-Darrieus runner, which extracted more energy.","PeriodicalId":38552,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Transactions","volume":"69 1","pages":"3-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Comparison of Two Runners for Gravitational Vortex Turbine\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Ruiz Sánchez, Angie Judith Guevara Muñoz, J. S. Río, José A. Montoya\",\"doi\":\"10.24423/ENGTRANS.1165.20210126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this study is to compare numerically the torque generated by two runners for a gravitational vortex turbine. One of the runners was an H-Darrieus turbine with the rotational flow into the chamber that helped to decrease its negative torque. The other runner was a standard (straight blade) turbine, which determined the performance in both cases. The study was conducted in ANSYSrCFX, where the model was configured at constant operating conditions in both cases. The standard runner performance was higher (75%) than that of the H-Darrieus runner. The highest torque for the standard and the H-Darrieus runners was 0.76 and 0.16 N·m, respectively. The standard runner had a larger fluid contact area than the H-Darrieus runner, which extracted more energy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Transactions\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"3-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24423/ENGTRANS.1165.20210126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24423/ENGTRANS.1165.20210126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的主要目的是对重力涡流涡轮机的两个转轮产生的扭矩进行数值比较。其中一个转轮是一台H-Darrieus涡轮机,其旋转流进入腔室,有助于降低其负扭矩。另一个转轮是标准(直叶片)涡轮机,它决定了这两种情况下的性能。这项研究是在ANSYSrCFX中进行的,在这两种情况下,模型都是在恒定的操作条件下配置的。标准跑者的成绩比H-Darrieus跑者高(75%)。标准和H-Darrieus转轮的最高扭矩分别为0.76和0.16 N·m。标准转轮的流体接触面积比H-Darrieus转轮大,后者提取了更多的能量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Comparison of Two Runners for Gravitational Vortex Turbine
The main purpose of this study is to compare numerically the torque generated by two runners for a gravitational vortex turbine. One of the runners was an H-Darrieus turbine with the rotational flow into the chamber that helped to decrease its negative torque. The other runner was a standard (straight blade) turbine, which determined the performance in both cases. The study was conducted in ANSYSrCFX, where the model was configured at constant operating conditions in both cases. The standard runner performance was higher (75%) than that of the H-Darrieus runner. The highest torque for the standard and the H-Darrieus runners was 0.76 and 0.16 N·m, respectively. The standard runner had a larger fluid contact area than the H-Darrieus runner, which extracted more energy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Transactions
Engineering Transactions Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Engineering Transactions (formerly Rozprawy Inżynierskie) is a refereed international journal founded in 1952. The journal promotes research and practice in engineering science and provides a forum for interdisciplinary publications combining mechanics with: Material science, Mechatronics, Biomechanics and Biotechnologies, Environmental science, Photonics, Information technologies, Other engineering applications. The journal publishes original papers covering a broad area of research activities including: experimental and hybrid techniques, analytical and numerical approaches. Review articles and special issues are also welcome. Following long tradition, all articles are peer reviewed and our expert referees ensure that the papers accepted for publication comply with high scientific standards. Engineering Transactions is a quarterly journal intended to be interesting and useful for the researchers and practitioners in academic and industrial communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信