快乐阶段是自动平静的文化记忆:科学写作权威还是权威驱动的知识?

Caroline Fredriksen
{"title":"快乐阶段是自动平静的文化记忆:科学写作权威还是权威驱动的知识?","authors":"Caroline Fredriksen","doi":"10.18261/issn.1894-3195-2021-02-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing hobbyist metal detecting presents new challenges for management of Norwegian heritage sites on arable land. New guidelines for metal detecting and determination of finders’ fee constitute new practice for managing finds and sites in the plough zone. Plough zone finds as heritage sites has emerged as an object of discourse for Norwegian cultural heritage management. Concurrently, Norwegian cultural heritage management is being transformed. Focus-ing on statements concerning the difference between løse kulturminner (stray finds) and automatically protected sites, this paper aims to explore the current view that many finds represent automatically protected sites. The analysis draws on the empirical data from the public hearing laying out the guidelines on metal detecting . Is this view founded on existing knowledge? And how does it affect plough-zone sites’ potential as scientific source material?","PeriodicalId":32079,"journal":{"name":"Heimen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pløyelagsfunn som automatisk fredete kulturminner: Kunnskapsdrevet forvaltning eller forvaltningsdrevet kunnskap?\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Fredriksen\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/issn.1894-3195-2021-02-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasing hobbyist metal detecting presents new challenges for management of Norwegian heritage sites on arable land. New guidelines for metal detecting and determination of finders’ fee constitute new practice for managing finds and sites in the plough zone. Plough zone finds as heritage sites has emerged as an object of discourse for Norwegian cultural heritage management. Concurrently, Norwegian cultural heritage management is being transformed. Focus-ing on statements concerning the difference between løse kulturminner (stray finds) and automatically protected sites, this paper aims to explore the current view that many finds represent automatically protected sites. The analysis draws on the empirical data from the public hearing laying out the guidelines on metal detecting . Is this view founded on existing knowledge? And how does it affect plough-zone sites’ potential as scientific source material?\",\"PeriodicalId\":32079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heimen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heimen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1894-3195-2021-02-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heimen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1894-3195-2021-02-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

越来越多的金属探测爱好者为管理挪威耕地上的遗产遗址提出了新的挑战。关于金属探测和确定发现者费用的新准则构成了管理犁区发现和遗址的新做法。作为遗产遗址的犁区发现已经成为挪威文化遗产管理的话语对象。与此同时,挪威的文化遗产管理正在转型。本文针对“流散发现”与“自动保护遗址”之间的区别,探讨了目前许多“流散发现”代表“自动保护遗址”的观点。该分析借鉴了制定金属探测指导方针的公开听证会的经验数据。这种观点是建立在现有知识基础上的吗?它又如何影响犁地遗址作为科学资料来源的潜力?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pløyelagsfunn som automatisk fredete kulturminner: Kunnskapsdrevet forvaltning eller forvaltningsdrevet kunnskap?
Increasing hobbyist metal detecting presents new challenges for management of Norwegian heritage sites on arable land. New guidelines for metal detecting and determination of finders’ fee constitute new practice for managing finds and sites in the plough zone. Plough zone finds as heritage sites has emerged as an object of discourse for Norwegian cultural heritage management. Concurrently, Norwegian cultural heritage management is being transformed. Focus-ing on statements concerning the difference between løse kulturminner (stray finds) and automatically protected sites, this paper aims to explore the current view that many finds represent automatically protected sites. The analysis draws on the empirical data from the public hearing laying out the guidelines on metal detecting . Is this view founded on existing knowledge? And how does it affect plough-zone sites’ potential as scientific source material?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信