亲子关系中与父母政治对话的频率和舒适度对家庭沟通模式和关系质量的中介作用

IF 2.2 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Xavier Scruggs, Paul Schrodt
{"title":"亲子关系中与父母政治对话的频率和舒适度对家庭沟通模式和关系质量的中介作用","authors":"Xavier Scruggs, Paul Schrodt","doi":"10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using Family Communication Patterns (FCP) theory, this study examined the frequency and comfort of young adults’ political conversations with their parents as mediators of family communication patterns and relational quality in parent–child relationships. Participants included 235 young adults from the United States who were predominantly White, college-educated, and conservative Republicans. After controlling for divorce status, political ideology, party affiliation, and political similarity with mother and father, the results indicated that conversation orientation positively predicts the comfort young adults have with discussing politics with both parents. Comfort discussing politics, in turn, mediated the positive association between conversation orientation and both indicators of relational quality. No evidence of mediation was observed for the frequency with which young adults talk politics with both parents, although frequency of political talk predicted closeness and satisfaction with father but only dissatisfaction with mother. Implications for FCP theory and political socialization are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","volume":"21 1","pages":"17 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Frequency and Comfort of Political Conversations with Parents as Mediators of Family Communication Patterns and Relational Quality in Parent–Child Relationships\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Scruggs, Paul Schrodt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Using Family Communication Patterns (FCP) theory, this study examined the frequency and comfort of young adults’ political conversations with their parents as mediators of family communication patterns and relational quality in parent–child relationships. Participants included 235 young adults from the United States who were predominantly White, college-educated, and conservative Republicans. After controlling for divorce status, political ideology, party affiliation, and political similarity with mother and father, the results indicated that conversation orientation positively predicts the comfort young adults have with discussing politics with both parents. Comfort discussing politics, in turn, mediated the positive association between conversation orientation and both indicators of relational quality. No evidence of mediation was observed for the frequency with which young adults talk politics with both parents, although frequency of political talk predicted closeness and satisfaction with father but only dissatisfaction with mother. Implications for FCP theory and political socialization are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"17 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1860053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

摘要运用家庭沟通模式(FCP)理论,本研究考察了年轻人与父母进行政治对话的频率和舒适度,作为家庭沟通模式和亲子关系质量的中介。参与者包括235名来自美国的年轻人,他们主要是白人、受过大学教育的保守派共和党人。在控制了离婚状况、政治意识形态、党派关系以及与父母的政治相似性后,研究结果表明,谈话取向正向预测了年轻人与父母讨论政治的舒适度。舒适地讨论政治反过来又在谈话取向和关系质量这两个指标之间起到了积极的联系。没有观察到年轻人与父母双方谈论政治的频率存在中介作用,尽管政治谈话的频率预测了与父亲的亲密程度和满意度,但仅预测了对母亲的不满。讨论了FCP理论对政治社会化的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Frequency and Comfort of Political Conversations with Parents as Mediators of Family Communication Patterns and Relational Quality in Parent–Child Relationships
ABSTRACT Using Family Communication Patterns (FCP) theory, this study examined the frequency and comfort of young adults’ political conversations with their parents as mediators of family communication patterns and relational quality in parent–child relationships. Participants included 235 young adults from the United States who were predominantly White, college-educated, and conservative Republicans. After controlling for divorce status, political ideology, party affiliation, and political similarity with mother and father, the results indicated that conversation orientation positively predicts the comfort young adults have with discussing politics with both parents. Comfort discussing politics, in turn, mediated the positive association between conversation orientation and both indicators of relational quality. No evidence of mediation was observed for the frequency with which young adults talk politics with both parents, although frequency of political talk predicted closeness and satisfaction with father but only dissatisfaction with mother. Implications for FCP theory and political socialization are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信