Gamma - 3钉联合空心加压螺钉固定危险外壁型转子间骨折

Q4 Medicine
W. Xiong, Ming Chen, Q. Zheng, Jun‐wen Wang, Wu-sheng Kan
{"title":"Gamma - 3钉联合空心加压螺钉固定危险外壁型转子间骨折","authors":"W. Xiong, Ming Chen, Q. Zheng, Jun‐wen Wang, Wu-sheng Kan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190618-00214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom November 2015 to December 2017, 60 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type were treated at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Of them, 27 ones, 15 males and 12 females with an age of 57.5 years±16.2 years (group A), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails and hollow compression screws, including 14 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 13 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The other 33 patients, 18 males and 15 females with an age of 59.3 years±15.1 years (group B), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails alone, including 17 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 16 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, complications and Harris hip scores at the final follow-up. \n \n \nResults \nThe 2 groups were comparable due to insignificant differences between them in preoperative general data (P>0.05). The 60 patients obtained an average follow-up of 22.6 months (from 12 to 36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss or hospital stay between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Group A had a significantly lower incidence of external wall redisplacement [7.4% (2/27)], significantly shorter weight-bearing time(5.4 weeks±1.0 weeks) and fracture healing time(18.3 weeks±3.9 weeks), and significantly higher Harris hip scores at the final follow-up (89.3±7.1) than group B did [24.2% (8/33), 7.4 weeks±1.3 weeks, 21.7 weeks±5.6 weeks and 79.5±8.3, respectively] (all P< 0.05). Follow-ups revealed no complications like femoral head cutting, implant breakage, deep vein thrombosis of lower limb, fat embolism, hip varus deformity or nail breakage in either group. \n \n \nConclusion \nIn the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type, compared with Gamma 3 nails alone, Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation can avoid external wall displacement or fixation failure after external medullary fixation or intramedullary fixation alone but does not increase operation time or intraoperative blood loss, leading to better functional recovery. \n \n \nKey words: \nHip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails","PeriodicalId":10145,"journal":{"name":"中华创伤骨科杂志","volume":"22 1","pages":"212-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type\",\"authors\":\"W. Xiong, Ming Chen, Q. Zheng, Jun‐wen Wang, Wu-sheng Kan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190618-00214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom November 2015 to December 2017, 60 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type were treated at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Of them, 27 ones, 15 males and 12 females with an age of 57.5 years±16.2 years (group A), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails and hollow compression screws, including 14 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 13 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The other 33 patients, 18 males and 15 females with an age of 59.3 years±15.1 years (group B), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails alone, including 17 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 16 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, complications and Harris hip scores at the final follow-up. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe 2 groups were comparable due to insignificant differences between them in preoperative general data (P>0.05). The 60 patients obtained an average follow-up of 22.6 months (from 12 to 36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss or hospital stay between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Group A had a significantly lower incidence of external wall redisplacement [7.4% (2/27)], significantly shorter weight-bearing time(5.4 weeks±1.0 weeks) and fracture healing time(18.3 weeks±3.9 weeks), and significantly higher Harris hip scores at the final follow-up (89.3±7.1) than group B did [24.2% (8/33), 7.4 weeks±1.3 weeks, 21.7 weeks±5.6 weeks and 79.5±8.3, respectively] (all P< 0.05). Follow-ups revealed no complications like femoral head cutting, implant breakage, deep vein thrombosis of lower limb, fat embolism, hip varus deformity or nail breakage in either group. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nIn the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type, compared with Gamma 3 nails alone, Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation can avoid external wall displacement or fixation failure after external medullary fixation or intramedullary fixation alone but does not increase operation time or intraoperative blood loss, leading to better functional recovery. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails\",\"PeriodicalId\":10145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"212-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华创伤骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190618-00214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华创伤骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115530-20190618-00214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价伽玛3钉结合空心加压螺钉内固定治疗危险型股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法自2015年11月至2017年12月,在武汉市第四医院骨外科治疗危险型股骨转子间骨折60例。其中27例,男15例,女12例,年龄57.5岁±16.2岁(A组),采用伽玛3钉和空心加压螺钉固定,其中31~A2.2型AO 14例,31~A2.3型AO 13例。其他33名患者,18名男性和15名女性,年龄为59.3岁±15.1岁(B组),仅用Gamma 3钉固定,其中17例为31-A2.2型AO,16例为31-A23型AO。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中失血量、负重时间、骨折愈合时间、并发症和Harris髋关节评分。结果两组患者术前一般数据差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05),60例患者平均随访22.6个月(12~36个月)。两组在手术时间、术中出血量或住院时间上无统计学差异(P>0.05),Harris髋关节评分(89.3±7.1)明显高于B组[24.2%(8/33),7.4周±1.3周,21.7周±5.6周和79.5±8.3周](均P<0.05)。结论在治疗高危外壁型股骨转子间骨折中,与单独使用伽玛3钉相比,伽玛3钉联合空心加压螺钉固定可以避免单独使用外髓固定或髓内固定后的外壁移位或固定失败,但不会增加手术时间或术中出血,从而导致更好的功能恢复。关键词:髋部骨折;骨折固定,髓内;骨钉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation for intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type
Objective To evaluate Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type. Methods From November 2015 to December 2017, 60 patients with intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type were treated at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Of them, 27 ones, 15 males and 12 females with an age of 57.5 years±16.2 years (group A), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails and hollow compression screws, including 14 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 13 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The other 33 patients, 18 males and 15 females with an age of 59.3 years±15.1 years (group B), were fixated with Gamma 3 nails alone, including 17 cases of AO type of 31-A2.2 and 16 cases of AO type of 31-A2.3. The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, complications and Harris hip scores at the final follow-up. Results The 2 groups were comparable due to insignificant differences between them in preoperative general data (P>0.05). The 60 patients obtained an average follow-up of 22.6 months (from 12 to 36 months). There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss or hospital stay between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Group A had a significantly lower incidence of external wall redisplacement [7.4% (2/27)], significantly shorter weight-bearing time(5.4 weeks±1.0 weeks) and fracture healing time(18.3 weeks±3.9 weeks), and significantly higher Harris hip scores at the final follow-up (89.3±7.1) than group B did [24.2% (8/33), 7.4 weeks±1.3 weeks, 21.7 weeks±5.6 weeks and 79.5±8.3, respectively] (all P< 0.05). Follow-ups revealed no complications like femoral head cutting, implant breakage, deep vein thrombosis of lower limb, fat embolism, hip varus deformity or nail breakage in either group. Conclusion In the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of risky external wall type, compared with Gamma 3 nails alone, Gamma 3 nails combined with hollow compression screw fixation can avoid external wall displacement or fixation failure after external medullary fixation or intramedullary fixation alone but does not increase operation time or intraoperative blood loss, leading to better functional recovery. Key words: Hip fractures; Fracture fixation, intramedullary; Bone nails
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7288
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信