伊斯兰p2p借贷作为印尼不公平的传统平台的替代解决方案

Q3 Social Sciences
Dewi Nurul Musjtari, Fiska Silvia Raden Roro, Ro’fah Setyowati
{"title":"伊斯兰p2p借贷作为印尼不公平的传统平台的替代解决方案","authors":"Dewi Nurul Musjtari, Fiska Silvia Raden Roro, Ro’fah Setyowati","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fintech implementation still lacks legal protection for the parties involved. The rules imposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK) have aspects of riba that contradict sharia compliance principles. This study determines alternative solutions to unfair practices in conventional Fintech, especially peer-to-peer lending (P2P lending) in Indonesian banking practices. The research uses normative and empirical methods with statutory and empirical data from library research and interviews. The study shows the presence of economic immorality in conventional P2P loan practices, such as maisyir, gharar, riba, dzalim, and haram, which are contrary to Islamic principles. This necessitates the application of primary sharia principles in sharia fintech. Thus, Islamic P2P Lending is an alternative solution to Islamic banking’s financial technology practices for customers using conventional fintech services. This is due to challenges in conventional fintech, including illegal fintech, intimidation in debt financing, high-interest rates, and the use of unlawful personal data. Therefore, the principles of sharia compliance and good faith are alternative solutions to strengthen sharia fintech and protect consumers.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ISLAMIC P2P LENDING AS AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION FOR THE UNFAIR CONVENTIONAL PLATFORM IN INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Nurul Musjtari, Fiska Silvia Raden Roro, Ro’fah Setyowati\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fintech implementation still lacks legal protection for the parties involved. The rules imposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK) have aspects of riba that contradict sharia compliance principles. This study determines alternative solutions to unfair practices in conventional Fintech, especially peer-to-peer lending (P2P lending) in Indonesian banking practices. The research uses normative and empirical methods with statutory and empirical data from library research and interviews. The study shows the presence of economic immorality in conventional P2P loan practices, such as maisyir, gharar, riba, dzalim, and haram, which are contrary to Islamic principles. This necessitates the application of primary sharia principles in sharia fintech. Thus, Islamic P2P Lending is an alternative solution to Islamic banking’s financial technology practices for customers using conventional fintech services. This is due to challenges in conventional fintech, including illegal fintech, intimidation in debt financing, high-interest rates, and the use of unlawful personal data. Therefore, the principles of sharia compliance and good faith are alternative solutions to strengthen sharia fintech and protect consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UUM Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

金融科技的实施仍然缺乏对相关方的法律保护。金融服务管理局(FSA/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK)实施的规则有一些与伊斯兰教法合规原则相矛盾的方面。本研究确定了传统金融科技中不公平做法的替代解决方案,特别是印度尼西亚银行实践中的点对点借贷(P2P借贷)。本研究采用规范和实证方法,从图书馆研究和访谈中获得法定和实证数据。该研究表明,传统的P2P贷款实践中存在经济不道德行为,例如maisyir, gharar, riba, dzalim和haram,这些都违背了伊斯兰原则。这就需要在伊斯兰金融科技中应用伊斯兰教法的基本原则。因此,对于使用传统金融科技服务的客户来说,伊斯兰P2P借贷是伊斯兰银行金融技术实践的另一种解决方案。这是由于传统金融科技面临的挑战,包括非法金融科技、债务融资中的恐吓、高利率和非法个人数据的使用。因此,遵守伊斯兰教法和诚信原则是加强伊斯兰金融科技和保护消费者的替代解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ISLAMIC P2P LENDING AS AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION FOR THE UNFAIR CONVENTIONAL PLATFORM IN INDONESIA
Fintech implementation still lacks legal protection for the parties involved. The rules imposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA/ Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK) have aspects of riba that contradict sharia compliance principles. This study determines alternative solutions to unfair practices in conventional Fintech, especially peer-to-peer lending (P2P lending) in Indonesian banking practices. The research uses normative and empirical methods with statutory and empirical data from library research and interviews. The study shows the presence of economic immorality in conventional P2P loan practices, such as maisyir, gharar, riba, dzalim, and haram, which are contrary to Islamic principles. This necessitates the application of primary sharia principles in sharia fintech. Thus, Islamic P2P Lending is an alternative solution to Islamic banking’s financial technology practices for customers using conventional fintech services. This is due to challenges in conventional fintech, including illegal fintech, intimidation in debt financing, high-interest rates, and the use of unlawful personal data. Therefore, the principles of sharia compliance and good faith are alternative solutions to strengthen sharia fintech and protect consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信