联合加权和修改加权总和产品评估为基础的方法的测量患者满意度:来自印度医疗保健的证据

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Satender Pal Singh, Tithishri Kundu, Arnab Adhikari, Sumanta Basu
{"title":"联合加权和修改加权总和产品评估为基础的方法的测量患者满意度:来自印度医疗保健的证据","authors":"Satender Pal Singh,&nbsp;Tithishri Kundu,&nbsp;Arnab Adhikari,&nbsp;Sumanta Basu","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent times, the increasing healthcare spending due to the rising health awareness signifies the importance of identifying the appropriate factors that influence patient satisfaction, weight assignment to these factors, and measurement of patient satisfaction becomes important. However, devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors and an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction scores has not been paid enough attention. Motivated by these issues, this work focuses on devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors that influence patient satisfaction, an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction, and real-life implementation. We first propose a joint weighting methodology to allocate the weights to the factors by integrating the weights determined by different objective weighting methods, namely, mean weight, SD, entropy, criteria importance through intercriteria correlation, and preference selection index-based approaches. Next, using the weights of these factors, we design a modified weighted aggregated sum product assessment method to determine a single patient satisfaction score by integrating the scores obtained from the weighted sum model and the weighted product model. The proposed methodology is applied to a real-world dataset provided by a large healthcare provider and diagnostic clinic in Kolkata, India, to exhibit the real-life implementation. The theoretical insights obtained through non-parametric tests highlight the significant difference between joint weighting-based and single weighting-based methods. The context-specific insights signify that the patients suffering from arthritis and hyperlipidaemia exhibit lower satisfaction. Also, the patients suffering from dengue express lower satisfaction than the patients suffering from malaria. Additionally, the healthcare provider should focus on improving the service quality of the departments such as ophthalmology, ENT, and dietician.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"29 1-2","pages":"5-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1767","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A joint weighting and modified weighted aggregated sum product assessment-based methodology for the measurement of patient satisfaction: Evidence from Indian healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Satender Pal Singh,&nbsp;Tithishri Kundu,&nbsp;Arnab Adhikari,&nbsp;Sumanta Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcda.1767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent times, the increasing healthcare spending due to the rising health awareness signifies the importance of identifying the appropriate factors that influence patient satisfaction, weight assignment to these factors, and measurement of patient satisfaction becomes important. However, devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors and an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction scores has not been paid enough attention. Motivated by these issues, this work focuses on devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors that influence patient satisfaction, an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction, and real-life implementation. We first propose a joint weighting methodology to allocate the weights to the factors by integrating the weights determined by different objective weighting methods, namely, mean weight, SD, entropy, criteria importance through intercriteria correlation, and preference selection index-based approaches. Next, using the weights of these factors, we design a modified weighted aggregated sum product assessment method to determine a single patient satisfaction score by integrating the scores obtained from the weighted sum model and the weighted product model. The proposed methodology is applied to a real-world dataset provided by a large healthcare provider and diagnostic clinic in Kolkata, India, to exhibit the real-life implementation. The theoretical insights obtained through non-parametric tests highlight the significant difference between joint weighting-based and single weighting-based methods. The context-specific insights signify that the patients suffering from arthritis and hyperlipidaemia exhibit lower satisfaction. Also, the patients suffering from dengue express lower satisfaction than the patients suffering from malaria. Additionally, the healthcare provider should focus on improving the service quality of the departments such as ophthalmology, ENT, and dietician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"volume\":\"29 1-2\",\"pages\":\"5-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1767\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,由于健康意识的提高,医疗保健支出不断增加,这意味着确定影响患者满意度的适当因素、对这些因素的权重分配以及患者满意度的测量变得非常重要。然而,设计一种稳健的客观加权方法来分配因素的权重和一种确定患者满意度分数的分析方法还没有得到足够的重视。受这些问题的启发,本研究的重点是设计一种强大的客观加权方法,用于对影响患者满意度的因素进行权重分配,一种确定患者满意度的分析方法,以及在现实生活中的实施。我们首先提出了一种联合加权方法,通过综合不同客观加权方法确定的权重,即平均权重、标准差、熵、标准间相关性的标准重要性和基于偏好选择指标的方法,为各因素分配权重。接下来,利用这些因素的权重,我们设计了一种改进的加权汇总和产品评估方法,通过综合加权和模型和加权产品模型得到的分数来确定单个患者满意度评分。所提出的方法应用于由印度加尔各答的一家大型医疗保健提供商和诊断诊所提供的真实数据集,以展示现实生活中的实现。通过非参数检验获得的理论见解突出了基于联合加权和基于单一加权的方法之间的显著差异。具体情况的见解表明,患有关节炎和高脂血症的患者表现出较低的满意度。登革热患者的满意度也低于疟疾患者。此外,医疗保健提供者应注重提高眼科、耳鼻喉科、营养师等部门的服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A joint weighting and modified weighted aggregated sum product assessment-based methodology for the measurement of patient satisfaction: Evidence from Indian healthcare

In recent times, the increasing healthcare spending due to the rising health awareness signifies the importance of identifying the appropriate factors that influence patient satisfaction, weight assignment to these factors, and measurement of patient satisfaction becomes important. However, devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors and an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction scores has not been paid enough attention. Motivated by these issues, this work focuses on devising a robust objective weighting method for weight assignment of the factors that influence patient satisfaction, an analytical method for determining patient satisfaction, and real-life implementation. We first propose a joint weighting methodology to allocate the weights to the factors by integrating the weights determined by different objective weighting methods, namely, mean weight, SD, entropy, criteria importance through intercriteria correlation, and preference selection index-based approaches. Next, using the weights of these factors, we design a modified weighted aggregated sum product assessment method to determine a single patient satisfaction score by integrating the scores obtained from the weighted sum model and the weighted product model. The proposed methodology is applied to a real-world dataset provided by a large healthcare provider and diagnostic clinic in Kolkata, India, to exhibit the real-life implementation. The theoretical insights obtained through non-parametric tests highlight the significant difference between joint weighting-based and single weighting-based methods. The context-specific insights signify that the patients suffering from arthritis and hyperlipidaemia exhibit lower satisfaction. Also, the patients suffering from dengue express lower satisfaction than the patients suffering from malaria. Additionally, the healthcare provider should focus on improving the service quality of the departments such as ophthalmology, ENT, and dietician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信