《国境之前:归化的法律与文学史》作者:斯蒂芬妮·德古耶(书评)

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
J. Shields
{"title":"《国境之前:归化的法律与文学史》作者:斯蒂芬妮·德古耶(书评)","authors":"J. Shields","doi":"10.1353/sdn.2023.a899463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"can only approximate the vast range of possible topics a disability studies reading of Joyce can pursue” (8). More essays like Rafael Hernandez’s “‘Dark in Mien and Movement’: Blindness and the Body in Ulysses”—which delves into how disability representation in Joyce is suffused with the colonialist racial hierarchies of his characters’ Ireland—would have deepened the engagement of this collection with disability studies’ current iteration as an intersectional and racially diverse field. At times, too, I felt that the authors in Joyce Writing Disability lapsed into the timehonored tradition of hagiography in Joyce scholarship. As modernist scholars develop more work in disability studies, we must be careful not to too quickly absolve our beloved artists from engagement with the eugenics-saturated culture of the time. Nevertheless, this collection’s stated purpose is to introduce Joyce scholars to disability studies perspectives, and in that capacity it’s a valuable and exciting text. My hope is that Colangelo’s editorial project, and the contributors’ apt demonstration of a range of disability studies perspectives, will inspire readers to consider Joyce Writing Disability a strong foundation for a rich, diverse scholarly conversation about disability in Joyce and modernist literature more broadly.","PeriodicalId":54138,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization by Stephanie Degooyer (review)\",\"authors\":\"J. Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sdn.2023.a899463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"can only approximate the vast range of possible topics a disability studies reading of Joyce can pursue” (8). More essays like Rafael Hernandez’s “‘Dark in Mien and Movement’: Blindness and the Body in Ulysses”—which delves into how disability representation in Joyce is suffused with the colonialist racial hierarchies of his characters’ Ireland—would have deepened the engagement of this collection with disability studies’ current iteration as an intersectional and racially diverse field. At times, too, I felt that the authors in Joyce Writing Disability lapsed into the timehonored tradition of hagiography in Joyce scholarship. As modernist scholars develop more work in disability studies, we must be careful not to too quickly absolve our beloved artists from engagement with the eugenics-saturated culture of the time. Nevertheless, this collection’s stated purpose is to introduce Joyce scholars to disability studies perspectives, and in that capacity it’s a valuable and exciting text. My hope is that Colangelo’s editorial project, and the contributors’ apt demonstration of a range of disability studies perspectives, will inspire readers to consider Joyce Writing Disability a strong foundation for a rich, diverse scholarly conversation about disability in Joyce and modernist literature more broadly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2023.a899463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN THE NOVEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2023.a899463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

更多的文章,比如拉斐尔·埃尔南德斯的《黑暗的行为和运动:尤利西斯的失明和身体》——它深入研究了乔伊斯的残疾表现如何充斥着他笔下人物爱尔兰的殖民主义种族等级制度——本可以加深这本合集对残疾研究的参与,使其成为一个交叉的、种族多样化的领域。有时,我也觉得《乔伊斯写残疾》的作者们陷入了乔伊斯学术中历史悠久的圣徒传记传统。随着现代主义学者在残疾研究方面开展更多工作,我们必须小心,不要过快地免除我们心爱的艺术家与当时充斥着优生学的文化的接触。尽管如此,这本合集的目的是向乔伊斯学者介绍残疾研究的观点,从这个角度来看,它是一本有价值和令人兴奋的书。我希望科朗吉洛的编辑项目,以及贡献者对一系列残疾研究视角的恰当展示,将激励读者将《乔伊斯写残疾》视为一个坚实的基础,为乔伊斯和更广泛的现代主义文学中关于残疾的丰富多样的学术对话奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization by Stephanie Degooyer (review)
can only approximate the vast range of possible topics a disability studies reading of Joyce can pursue” (8). More essays like Rafael Hernandez’s “‘Dark in Mien and Movement’: Blindness and the Body in Ulysses”—which delves into how disability representation in Joyce is suffused with the colonialist racial hierarchies of his characters’ Ireland—would have deepened the engagement of this collection with disability studies’ current iteration as an intersectional and racially diverse field. At times, too, I felt that the authors in Joyce Writing Disability lapsed into the timehonored tradition of hagiography in Joyce scholarship. As modernist scholars develop more work in disability studies, we must be careful not to too quickly absolve our beloved artists from engagement with the eugenics-saturated culture of the time. Nevertheless, this collection’s stated purpose is to introduce Joyce scholars to disability studies perspectives, and in that capacity it’s a valuable and exciting text. My hope is that Colangelo’s editorial project, and the contributors’ apt demonstration of a range of disability studies perspectives, will inspire readers to consider Joyce Writing Disability a strong foundation for a rich, diverse scholarly conversation about disability in Joyce and modernist literature more broadly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL
STUDIES IN THE NOVEL LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: From its inception, Studies in the Novel has been dedicated to building a scholarly community around the world-making potentialities of the novel. Studies in the Novel started as an idea among several members of the English Department of the University of North Texas during the summer of 1965. They determined that there was a need for a journal “devoted to publishing critical and scholarly articles on the novel with no restrictions on either chronology or nationality of the novelists studied.” The founding editor, University of North Texas professor of contemporary literature James W. Lee, envisioned a journal of international scope and influence. Since then, Studies in the Novel has staked its reputation upon publishing incisive scholarship on the canon-forming and cutting-edge novelists that have shaped the genre’s rich history. The journal continues to break new ground by promoting new theoretical approaches, a broader international scope, and an engagement with the contemporary novel as a form of social critique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信