使用在线平台进行基于问题的学习:新冠肺炎大流行期间强制性电子学习的交互式替代方案

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
M. Chimmalgi, S. Rajesh, K. Anil Kumar, U. Asha, J. Jose, Komalavallyamma Chandrakumari
{"title":"使用在线平台进行基于问题的学习:新冠肺炎大流行期间强制性电子学习的交互式替代方案","authors":"M. Chimmalgi, S. Rajesh, K. Anil Kumar, U. Asha, J. Jose, Komalavallyamma Chandrakumari","doi":"10.4103/jasi.jasi_13_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) helps in contextual and experiential learning. PBL using online platforms (PBL-op) was introduced to counter the declining interest in the mandatory e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PBL-op on learning outcome; student perception of PBL-op; effect of communication and motivation on learning outcome; and performance in PBL-op. Material and Methods: Study participants were introduced PBL-op and the control group to PBL in classroom setting. Five-way assessment was done: learning outcome by pre-and postintervention tests; performance by project reports and presentations; communication skills; motivation; and student satisfaction through an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired or independent t-tests to compare paired variables, Spearman's correlation to establish association, and theme-based analysis for qualitative inputs. Results: Students showed better learning outcome with PBL op than with e learning (t = 11.199; P < 0.001*), traditional teaching (t = 12.193; P < 0.001*) and PBL in classroom setting (t = −15.493; P < 0.001*; d = 1.83). Women outperformed men with PBL-op (t = −2.74; P = 0.0034*; d = 0.48). Performance in PBL was better when conducted using online platforms than in classroom setting (t = 8.5471; P < 0.001*; d = 1.01). However, learning outcome and performance in PBL-op did not show a significant association with motivation or communication skills. Students favored PBL-op as it offered them an opportunity for active participation. Discussion and Conclusion: PBL-op offers all the advantages of PBL and allows productive teamwork using familiar online platforms and freedom from restrictive class timings. It is, therefore, suggested that PBL-op may be used as a feasible and effective alternative to PBL even after the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":50010,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anatomical Society of India","volume":"71 1","pages":"178 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-based learning using online platforms: An interactive alternative to mandatory e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"M. Chimmalgi, S. Rajesh, K. Anil Kumar, U. Asha, J. Jose, Komalavallyamma Chandrakumari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jasi.jasi_13_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) helps in contextual and experiential learning. PBL using online platforms (PBL-op) was introduced to counter the declining interest in the mandatory e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PBL-op on learning outcome; student perception of PBL-op; effect of communication and motivation on learning outcome; and performance in PBL-op. Material and Methods: Study participants were introduced PBL-op and the control group to PBL in classroom setting. Five-way assessment was done: learning outcome by pre-and postintervention tests; performance by project reports and presentations; communication skills; motivation; and student satisfaction through an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired or independent t-tests to compare paired variables, Spearman's correlation to establish association, and theme-based analysis for qualitative inputs. Results: Students showed better learning outcome with PBL op than with e learning (t = 11.199; P < 0.001*), traditional teaching (t = 12.193; P < 0.001*) and PBL in classroom setting (t = −15.493; P < 0.001*; d = 1.83). Women outperformed men with PBL-op (t = −2.74; P = 0.0034*; d = 0.48). Performance in PBL was better when conducted using online platforms than in classroom setting (t = 8.5471; P < 0.001*; d = 1.01). However, learning outcome and performance in PBL-op did not show a significant association with motivation or communication skills. Students favored PBL-op as it offered them an opportunity for active participation. Discussion and Conclusion: PBL-op offers all the advantages of PBL and allows productive teamwork using familiar online platforms and freedom from restrictive class timings. It is, therefore, suggested that PBL-op may be used as a feasible and effective alternative to PBL even after the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Anatomical Society of India\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"178 - 185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Anatomical Society of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jasi.jasi_13_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anatomical Society of India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jasi.jasi_13_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于问题的学习(PBL)有助于情境学习和体验学习。引入使用在线平台的PBL (PBL-op)是为了应对COVID-19大流行期间对强制性电子学习的兴趣下降。本研究的目的是确定PBL-op对学习结果的影响;学生对PBL-op的认知;交流与动机对学习效果的影响在PBL-op中的表现。材料与方法:将PBL-op和对照组分别引入PBL课堂。五方面评估:通过干预前和干预后测试学习效果;项目报告和演示的表现;沟通技巧;动机;以及学生满意度的匿名调查。数据分析采用描述性统计、配对或独立t检验来比较配对变量、Spearman相关来建立关联、基于主题的分析来进行定性输入。结果:PBL学习效果优于e学习(t = 11.199;P < 0.001*),传统教学(t = 12.193;P < 0.001*)和PBL (t = - 15.493;P < 0.001*;D = 1.83)。女性的PBL-op优于男性(t =−2.74;P = 0.0034*;D = 0.48)。在网络平台上进行PBL的表现优于在课堂上进行PBL (t = 8.5471;P < 0.001*;D = 1.01)。然而,PBL-op的学习结果和表现与动机或沟通技巧没有显着关联。学生喜欢公共关系学,因为它为他们提供了一个积极参与的机会。讨论与结论:PBL-op提供了PBL的所有优点,允许使用熟悉的在线平台进行高效的团队合作,并且不受课堂时间的限制。因此,建议即使在大流行之后,PBL-op也可作为PBL的可行和有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem-based learning using online platforms: An interactive alternative to mandatory e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
Introduction: Problem-based learning (PBL) helps in contextual and experiential learning. PBL using online platforms (PBL-op) was introduced to counter the declining interest in the mandatory e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of PBL-op on learning outcome; student perception of PBL-op; effect of communication and motivation on learning outcome; and performance in PBL-op. Material and Methods: Study participants were introduced PBL-op and the control group to PBL in classroom setting. Five-way assessment was done: learning outcome by pre-and postintervention tests; performance by project reports and presentations; communication skills; motivation; and student satisfaction through an anonymous survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired or independent t-tests to compare paired variables, Spearman's correlation to establish association, and theme-based analysis for qualitative inputs. Results: Students showed better learning outcome with PBL op than with e learning (t = 11.199; P < 0.001*), traditional teaching (t = 12.193; P < 0.001*) and PBL in classroom setting (t = −15.493; P < 0.001*; d = 1.83). Women outperformed men with PBL-op (t = −2.74; P = 0.0034*; d = 0.48). Performance in PBL was better when conducted using online platforms than in classroom setting (t = 8.5471; P < 0.001*; d = 1.01). However, learning outcome and performance in PBL-op did not show a significant association with motivation or communication skills. Students favored PBL-op as it offered them an opportunity for active participation. Discussion and Conclusion: PBL-op offers all the advantages of PBL and allows productive teamwork using familiar online platforms and freedom from restrictive class timings. It is, therefore, suggested that PBL-op may be used as a feasible and effective alternative to PBL even after the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Anatomical Society of India (JASI) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Anatomical Society of India. The aim of the journal is to enhance and upgrade the research work in the field of anatomy and allied clinical subjects. It provides an integrative forum for anatomists across the globe to exchange their knowledge and views. It also helps to promote communication among fellow academicians and researchers worldwide. It provides an opportunity to academicians to disseminate their knowledge that is directly relevant to all domains of health sciences. It covers content on Gross Anatomy, Neuroanatomy, Imaging Anatomy, Developmental Anatomy, Histology, Clinical Anatomy, Medical Education, Morphology, and Genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信