国际高等教育作为外交政策:欧盟、中国和俄罗斯对中亚战略比较

Kerry Longhurst, Agnieszka Nitza-Makowska, Katarzyna Skiert-Andrzejuk
{"title":"国际高等教育作为外交政策:欧盟、中国和俄罗斯对中亚战略比较","authors":"Kerry Longhurst, Agnieszka Nitza-Makowska, Katarzyna Skiert-Andrzejuk","doi":"10.15804/ppsy202228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article sheds light on the nexus between higher education and foreign policy. International higher education has become an increasingly prominent element of some states’ policies towards other countries as a flank to traditional foreign policy. It has occurred in Central Asia, where the European Union, China and Russia are all supporting teaching, research and capacity-building activities in the tertiary sectors of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Although they employ similar tools and instruments, the assumptions and visions underpinning their respective strategies diverge. Russia’s strategy is shaped by historically informed identity factors and the impulse to entrench predominance in the post-Soviet space, whilst China uses its support for higher education as a soft infrastructure for its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Meanwhile, the EU has integrated higher education into its strategy for the region, which aims at drawing Central Asia closer to its orbit through democratisation and the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":32104,"journal":{"name":"Polish Political Science Yearbook","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Higher Education as Foreign Policy: Comparing the Strategies of the EU, China, and Russia Towards Central Asia\",\"authors\":\"Kerry Longhurst, Agnieszka Nitza-Makowska, Katarzyna Skiert-Andrzejuk\",\"doi\":\"10.15804/ppsy202228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article sheds light on the nexus between higher education and foreign policy. International higher education has become an increasingly prominent element of some states’ policies towards other countries as a flank to traditional foreign policy. It has occurred in Central Asia, where the European Union, China and Russia are all supporting teaching, research and capacity-building activities in the tertiary sectors of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Although they employ similar tools and instruments, the assumptions and visions underpinning their respective strategies diverge. Russia’s strategy is shaped by historically informed identity factors and the impulse to entrench predominance in the post-Soviet space, whilst China uses its support for higher education as a soft infrastructure for its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Meanwhile, the EU has integrated higher education into its strategy for the region, which aims at drawing Central Asia closer to its orbit through democratisation and the rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Political Science Yearbook\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Political Science Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Political Science Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章揭示了高等教育与外交政策之间的关系。作为传统外交政策的一个侧面,国际高等教育已成为一些国家对其他国家政策中日益突出的因素。这种情况发生在中亚,欧洲联盟、中国和俄罗斯都在支持哈萨克斯坦、乌兹别克斯坦和吉尔吉斯斯坦高等教育部门的教学、研究和能力建设活动。尽管他们使用了类似的工具和工具,但支撑他们各自战略的假设和愿景却存在分歧。俄罗斯的战略是由历史上知情的身份因素和在后苏联空间巩固主导地位的冲动决定的,而中国则将其对高等教育的支持作为其“一带一路”倡议倡议(BRI)的软基础设施。与此同时,欧盟已将高等教育纳入其对该地区的战略,旨在通过民主化和法治使中亚更接近其轨道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Higher Education as Foreign Policy: Comparing the Strategies of the EU, China, and Russia Towards Central Asia
The article sheds light on the nexus between higher education and foreign policy. International higher education has become an increasingly prominent element of some states’ policies towards other countries as a flank to traditional foreign policy. It has occurred in Central Asia, where the European Union, China and Russia are all supporting teaching, research and capacity-building activities in the tertiary sectors of Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Although they employ similar tools and instruments, the assumptions and visions underpinning their respective strategies diverge. Russia’s strategy is shaped by historically informed identity factors and the impulse to entrench predominance in the post-Soviet space, whilst China uses its support for higher education as a soft infrastructure for its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Meanwhile, the EU has integrated higher education into its strategy for the region, which aims at drawing Central Asia closer to its orbit through democratisation and the rule of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信